Difference between revisions of "TSC SWOT"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Anne wizauer (talk | contribs) |
Anne wizauer (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
− | Approved by TSC 2016-01-14, current edits started 2019-01-12 | + | Approved by TSC 2016-01-14, current edits started 2019-01-12. Threats to be addressed before approval. |
Latest revision as of 16:21, 12 January 2019
- Strengths
- Clear focus on delineated governance and management activities
- Respected, committed, highly experienced membership
- Open, transparent, and responsive
- Weaknesses
- Limited influence over resources
- Inconsistent interaction and support from Board and Working Groups
- Organizational complexity
- Insufficient time spent on big picture issues
- Opportunities
- Become more proactive
- Product quality
- Process Improvement
- New tooling
- Respond to new opportunities for increasing membership
- Increase participation through simplification
- Revising Working Group structure to become more efficient and attract more participants
- Increased cooperation and collaboration with other industry groups
- Threats
- Danger of creating overheads without visible return
- Lack of confidence in standards management may cause stakeholders to create their own healthcare standards
- Keeping up with increased uptake of our standards (e.g. FHIR)
- Lack of adequate governance, management, curation and support processes to manage our standards and the resulting profiles that are created
- Lack of well-defined conformance and profiling methodologies for our standards
- Lack of HL7 Strategic Plan
- Succession planning
- Not enough international participation on TSC
Approved by TSC 2016-01-14, current edits started 2019-01-12. Threats to be addressed before approval.