Difference between revisions of "TSC SWOT"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Anne wizauer (talk | contribs) |
Anne wizauer (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
**Limited control over resources | **Limited control over resources | ||
**Inconsistent support from Board and Working Groups | **Inconsistent support from Board and Working Groups | ||
| − | ** | + | **Organizational complexity |
| − | + | **Inconsistent product quality | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | ** | ||
*Opportunities | *Opportunities | ||
**Business Architecture Model development offers improved Governance and Management to match existing Methodology strengths | **Business Architecture Model development offers improved Governance and Management to match existing Methodology strengths | ||
| − | ** | + | **Transnational/regional programs can increase worldwide uptake |
**Clearly designate our product line and product identification | **Clearly designate our product line and product identification | ||
**Emergence of new and contemporary technology including FHIR and semantic web ontologies | **Emergence of new and contemporary technology including FHIR and semantic web ontologies | ||
**Respond to new opportunities for increasing membership | **Respond to new opportunities for increasing membership | ||
| − | + | **Increase participation through simplification | |
| − | **Increase participation through simplification | + | **Revising Working Group structure to become more efficient and attract more participants |
*Threats | *Threats | ||
| − | ** | + | **Danger of creating overheads without visible return |
| − | + | **Lack of confidence in standards management may cause stakeholders to create their own healthcare standards | |
| − | **Lack of confidence in standards management | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
**Keeping up with increased uptake of our standards (e.g. FHIR) | **Keeping up with increased uptake of our standards (e.g. FHIR) | ||
| − | **Lack of adequate governance, management, curation and support processes to manage our standards and the resulting profiles that are created | + | **Lack of adequate governance, management, curation and support processes to manage our standards and the resulting profiles that are created |
**Lack of well-defined conformance and profiling methodologies for our standards | **Lack of well-defined conformance and profiling methodologies for our standards | ||
| + | **Lack of HL7 Strategic Plan | ||
| − | Approved by TSC | + | Approved by TSC 2016-01-14 |
Revision as of 22:57, 14 January 2017
- Strengths
- Clear focus on delineated governance and management activities
- Respected, committed, highly experienced membership
- Support from HQ
- Open, transparent, and responsive
- Proactive
- Weaknesses
- Limited time
- Limited control over resources
- Inconsistent support from Board and Working Groups
- Organizational complexity
- Inconsistent product quality
- Opportunities
- Business Architecture Model development offers improved Governance and Management to match existing Methodology strengths
- Transnational/regional programs can increase worldwide uptake
- Clearly designate our product line and product identification
- Emergence of new and contemporary technology including FHIR and semantic web ontologies
- Respond to new opportunities for increasing membership
- Increase participation through simplification
- Revising Working Group structure to become more efficient and attract more participants
- Threats
- Danger of creating overheads without visible return
- Lack of confidence in standards management may cause stakeholders to create their own healthcare standards
- Keeping up with increased uptake of our standards (e.g. FHIR)
- Lack of adequate governance, management, curation and support processes to manage our standards and the resulting profiles that are created
- Lack of well-defined conformance and profiling methodologies for our standards
- Lack of HL7 Strategic Plan
Approved by TSC 2016-01-14
