Difference between revisions of "TSC SWOT"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Anne wizauer (talk | contribs) |
Anne wizauer (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
**Lack of confidence in standards management creates vacuum for Profiler/Enforcer creating their own healthcare interoperability standards | **Lack of confidence in standards management creates vacuum for Profiler/Enforcer creating their own healthcare interoperability standards | ||
**Increasing numbers of mandates coming from the US Realm | **Increasing numbers of mandates coming from the US Realm | ||
| − | **Lack of clear relationship between user groups and work groups | + | **'''Lack of clear relationship between user groups and work groups''' |
**Keeping up with increased uptake of our standards (e.g. FHIR) | **Keeping up with increased uptake of our standards (e.g. FHIR) | ||
**Lack of adequate governance, management, curation and support processes to manage our standards and the resulting profiles that are created. | **Lack of adequate governance, management, curation and support processes to manage our standards and the resulting profiles that are created. | ||
Revision as of 16:58, 21 November 2016
- Strengths
- Clear focus on delineated governance and management activities
- Respected, committed, highly experienced membership
- Support from HQ
- Open, transparent, and responsive
- Proactive
- Weaknesses
- Limited time
- Limited control over resources
- Inconsistent support from Board and Working Groups
- Lack of effective process for bringing in external proposed standards.
- Lack of clear definition of the endorsement of external standards
- Lack of linkage with HL7 Strategic Plan
- Lack of coordination between T3SD WGs and HQ and other WGs
- Change to intellectual property licensing has created inconsistent adherence to the intellectual property policy
- Organizational complexity {new}
- Opportunities
- Business Architecture Model development offers improved Governance and Management to match existing Methodology strengths
- Change to Intellectual Property licensing at no cost
- Increased worldwide uptake (by transnational/regional programs)
- Clearly designate our product line and product identification
- Emergence of new and contemporary technology including FHIR and semantic web ontologies
- Respond to new opportunities for increasing membership
- Improve product quality
- Increase participation through simplification {new}
- Threats
- Creating overheads without visible return
- Failure to improve Product Quality
- Lack of confidence in standards management creates vacuum for Profiler/Enforcer creating their own healthcare interoperability standards
- Increasing numbers of mandates coming from the US Realm
- Lack of clear relationship between user groups and work groups
- Keeping up with increased uptake of our standards (e.g. FHIR)
- Lack of adequate governance, management, curation and support processes to manage our standards and the resulting profiles that are created.
- Lack of well-defined conformance and profiling methodologies for our standards
Approved by TSC 2015-10-03
