2015-06-22 TSC Call Agenda

Standing Conference Calls

TSC will hold a Conference Call at 11AM Eastern time, each Monday except during scheduled face-to-face Working Group Meetings unless otherwise noted at TSC_Minutes_and_Agendas.

GoToMeeting at https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/426505829 using VOIP

For those without access to microphone/speakers:

US: +1 (224)501-3318

Canada: +1 (647)497-9379

Italy: +39 0 230 57 81 80

Access Code: 426-505-829

GoToMeeting ID: 426-505-829

HL7 TSC Meeting Minutes Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371# NEW GoToMeeting ID: 426-505-829		Date: 2015-06-22 Time: 11:00 AM U.S. Eastern
Facilitator: Ken McCaslin		Note taker(s): Anne Wizauer

Quorum = chair + 5 including 2 SD represented				yes/no
Chair/CTO		ArB		International Affiliate Rep		Ad-Hoc
x	Ken McCaslin	x	Tony Julian	x	Jean Duteau	.
x	John Quinn	x	Lorraine Constable	.	Giorgio Cangioli	.
Domain Experts		Foundation and Technology		Structure and Semantic Design		Technical and Support Services
x	Melva Peters	Regrets	Woody Beeler	x	Calvin Beebe	Regrets	Freida Hall
.	John Roberts	x	Paul Knapp	x	Pat van Dyke	x	Andy Stechishin
.		x	Russ Hamm	.		.
ex officio		Invited Guests		Observers		HL7 Staff
.	Stan Huff (HL7 Chair) w/vote	.	Lloyd McKenzie	.	obs1	.	Anne Wizauer
.	Chuck Jaffe (CEO) vote	.	.	.	obs2	.
.		.		.	.	.

Agenda

Housekeeping

1. Introduction of visitors (including declaration of interests)
   • Lloyd McKenzie - Review list of items that are being transitioned to FHIR Infrastructure WG and FHIR Core WG
     • List of items resides at the bottom of the minutes in the 20150615_FGB_concall
2. Agenda review and approval -
3. Approve Minutes of 2015-06-15 TSC Call Agenda

Governance

1. Approval items:
2. Discussion topics:
   • Management of inquires from ONC and Homeland Security update (John Q. 10 Min)
   • UDI Review and Discussion (Paul - 20 Min)

Management

1. Review action items –
   • Discuss of FHIR registry (Chuck - 20 min)
2. Approval items from last week's e-vote: Approved 6/0/0 with ArB, DESD, T3SD, SSD-SD, and both International affiliates voting
   • Project Approval Request by the InM WG of FTSD for Reaffirmation of HL7 Version 3 Standard: Shared Messages, Release 3 at Project Insight 1156 and TSC Tracker 8278
   • Project Approval Request by the InM WG of FTSD for Reaffirmation of CCOW 1.6 at Project Insight 1164 and TSC Tracker 8279
   • Normative Notification by the InM WG of the FTSD for HL7 Version 3 Standard: Transmission Infrastructure, Release 2 at Project Insight 1164 and TSC Tracker 8312
   • Informative Publication Request by the RCRIM WG of DESD of HL7 Version 3 Implementation Guide: Regulated Studies; Annotated ECG R1, Release 2 - US Realm at Project Insight 1070 and TSC Tracker 8320
3. Discussion topics:
4. Reports: (attach written reports below from Steering Divisions et al.)
5. Open Issues List

Minutes

• Meeting minutes from last week approved by general consent
• John Quinn on ONC and Homeland security update: Potential disruption with introducing NEEM patient demographics for lab transactions. John states there is no easy quick mapping between V2.5.1 and NEEM and advised them as such. John will ask for official documentation for posting on the TSC page.
• Chuck on FHIR Registry:
  • Chuck obtained funding through Argonaut for the registry. Opportunities for multiple registries exist. Concern is confusing stakeholders if we have too many. However, we need to sufficiently distinguish amongst the technologies or specifications which are included within each registry. What we’ve established is that we don’t want the concerns that were raised when we had the Trifolia registry with the source of truth. There are registries that may emerge in other communities such as the effort that Furore is undertaking.
  • Paul wonders how existing committees are reviewing the process such as tooling, etc. And also who and/or what is FHIR.org? Chuck: The coordination of the registry efforts is under the TSC. FHIR.org content is under the purview of the FHIR WG in HL7. Paul states it’s not under their scope. Chuck: We could have yet another initiative or change the scope. FHIR.org is a website which Grahame created and is part of HL7. Lorraine’s understanding is that FHIR.org is intended to be a site to support the community of implementers. Paul clarifies that it is not a corporate entity and Chuck confirms. Chuck will take any concerns on ownership back to Grahame. Paul states his discomfort is not on having additional websites – it’s that FHIR.org discussions sounded like it was a separate corporate entity. Overall concern is the message to the membership on what it is and what it’s doing.
• Paul on UDI:
  • Paul describes the history of the work by the task force using powerpoint slides. Pat asks if there is anything published around a three-way agreement between organizations regarding passing it as a string. Paul states the joint agreement is on hold currently but is planned for the future, but the draft agreement does state that. Discussion on where to go next – should UDI continue to be a task force? Who should do this work? What other information needs to go with the UDI? Ken asks why HL7 must drive this when it should be driven by subject matter experts based on a well-defined use case? Paul says O&O has the SMEs. O&O needs to create the project; address the multiple format; coordinate with other SDOs; and maintain UDI consistency within HL7 standards.
  • Should we continue to have the task force, or disperse the work effectively to other places? Ken states that he feels that this should go through the existing WG process to help drive a domain issue – we need a good use case that articulates the whole IG. Not a stand-alone standard, a component within a message. Lorraine states that the communication across standards bodies needs to sit somewhere. Paul: so we agree on points one and two, but we need clarity on #3 (Coordination with other SDOs from an HL7 perspective) and #4 (Maintain the UDI representation consistency within HL7 standards). Coordination with other SDOs could go through the Organization Relationship Committee (an HL7 Board committee).
  • ACTION: John Q. will take back #3 to the EC for discussion. Paul says it shouldn’t go there until the project is further along. #4, maintaining consistency – Ken suggests leaving that up to the participants? Lorraine states that in the long term it would be a Standards Governance Board issue. Paul agrees. Paul states with this input we can dissolve the task force.
• Ken: we have a major benefactor dropping membership because of disappointment with RCRIM. Ken asks if someone on TSC with knowledge of RCRIM could reach out to him to discuss.
• Call adjourned at 12:04.

Next Steps

Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date) .

Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items 2015-06-29 TSC Call Agenda.

© 2015 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.