Difference between revisions of "2014-11-10 TSC Call Agenda"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Anne wizauer (talk | contribs) |
Anne wizauer (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 114: | Line 114: | ||
===Minutes=== | ===Minutes=== | ||
− | |||
− | |||
'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/> | '''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/> | ||
*Minutes review: Minutes accepted as approved. | *Minutes review: Minutes accepted as approved. | ||
Line 121: | Line 119: | ||
*FHIR DSTU timeline: Melva and pharmacy group dissatisfied with the current timeline communication and expectations and suggestion that groups that don’t have material done on time will receive resource assistance from outside the WG. Some concerns were addressed late last week with the offer of submitting placeholders instead of full material for December, although some question the value of that. May 2015 is comment only ballot but might be delayed until September. Extended discussion over ballot timelines. Find out what requirements and drivers are. Action: Put question on USRTF agenda: Is there something that ONC is doing that is dependent on the next version of FHIR? Does the ONC have any material requirements for ballot timing for FHIR? Action: Lorraine to take the issue to the FGB for discussion. Action: Paul to discuss with FMG. Action: Put this on the TSC agenda for discussion next week. | *FHIR DSTU timeline: Melva and pharmacy group dissatisfied with the current timeline communication and expectations and suggestion that groups that don’t have material done on time will receive resource assistance from outside the WG. Some concerns were addressed late last week with the offer of submitting placeholders instead of full material for December, although some question the value of that. May 2015 is comment only ballot but might be delayed until September. Extended discussion over ballot timelines. Find out what requirements and drivers are. Action: Put question on USRTF agenda: Is there something that ONC is doing that is dependent on the next version of FHIR? Does the ONC have any material requirements for ballot timing for FHIR? Action: Lorraine to take the issue to the FGB for discussion. Action: Paul to discuss with FMG. Action: Put this on the TSC agenda for discussion next week. | ||
*Use case repository request: what is the general feeling of the group? Paul thinks it would be valuable. Some concern around budgetary restraints and bandwidth. Must also balance with organizational priorities. Will need to gather more information regarding product family/product line as well. Put on Saturday agenda at WG meeting, as well as work going on with tooling strategy (Andy) | *Use case repository request: what is the general feeling of the group? Paul thinks it would be valuable. Some concern around budgetary restraints and bandwidth. Must also balance with organizational priorities. Will need to gather more information regarding product family/product line as well. Put on Saturday agenda at WG meeting, as well as work going on with tooling strategy (Andy) | ||
− | *Discussion regarding e-vote item [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/3676/12494/2015MAY_PSS_StrucDocs_BeebeBehling_HL7_CDA_R2.1_revised.doc Project approval request] for ''HL7 Clinical Document Architecture, Release 2.1'', for Structured Docs WG of SSD SD, at [https://www.hl7.org/special/Committees/projman/searchableProjectIndex.cfm?action=edit&ProjectNumber=1150 Project Insight 1150] and [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=3676&start=1000 TSC Tracker 3676] being backwards compatible. Group came to conclusion that the project is approved but that there may be questions arising around the issue from other groups. Andy moves to approve the PSS with a note that updates to the CDA specification institute a special case and we are approving it to use the RIM and datatypes R1 on that basis. Paul seconds. Anne to forward to WG. | + | *Discussion regarding e-vote item [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/3676/12494/2015MAY_PSS_StrucDocs_BeebeBehling_HL7_CDA_R2.1_revised.doc Project approval request] for ''HL7 Clinical Document Architecture, Release 2.1'', for Structured Docs WG of SSD SD, at [https://www.hl7.org/special/Committees/projman/searchableProjectIndex.cfm?action=edit&ProjectNumber=1150 Project Insight 1150] and [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=3676&start=1000 TSC Tracker 3676] being backwards compatible. Group came to conclusion that the project is approved but that there may be questions arising around the issue from other groups. Andy moves to approve the PSS with a note that these updates to the CDA specification institute a special case and we are approving it to use the RIM version from CDA R2 and datatypes R1 on that basis. Paul seconds. Anne to forward to WG. |
*TSC reps to the nominating committee: Melva, Freida. Ken will send to the Board. Ken/Anne to add to TSC wiki. | *TSC reps to the nominating committee: Melva, Freida. Ken will send to the Board. Ken/Anne to add to TSC wiki. | ||
*next week: FHIR Core WG proposal, ballot approvals for January15. Group to email concerns end of this week in advance of Monday’s call. | *next week: FHIR Core WG proposal, ballot approvals for January15. Group to email concerns end of this week in advance of Monday’s call. | ||
Call adjourned at 12:01. | Call adjourned at 12:01. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
===Next Steps=== | ===Next Steps=== |
Latest revision as of 16:42, 11 November 2014
TSC Agenda/Minutes
Meeting Info/Attendees
Standing Conference Calls
TSC will hold a Conference Call at 11AM Eastern time, each Monday except during scheduled face-to-face Working Group Meetings unless otherwise noted at TSC_Minutes_and_Agendas.
- GoToMeeting at https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/426505829 using VOIP
- For those without access to microphone/speakers:
- US: +1 (224)501-3318
- Canada: +1 (647)497-9379
- Italy: +39 0 230 57 81 80
- Access Code: 426-505-829
- GoToMeeting ID: 426-505-829
HL7 TSC Meeting Minutes Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371# |
Date: 2014-11-10 Time: 11:00 AM U.S. Eastern | |
Facilitator: Ken McCaslin | Note taker(s): Anne Wizauer |
Quorum = chair + 5 including 2 SD represented | yes/no | ||||||
Chair/CTO | ArB | International Affiliate Rep | Ad-Hoc | ||||
x | Ken McCaslin | x | Tony Julian | x | Jean Duteau | . | |
x | John Quinn | x | Lorraine Constable | x | Giorgio Cangioli | . | |
Domain Experts | Foundation and Technology | Structure and Semantic Design | Technical and Support Services | ||||
x | Melva Peters | Regrets | Woody Beeler | Regrets | Calvin Beebe | x | Freida Hall |
x | John Roberts | x | Paul Knapp | x | Pat van Dyke | x | Andy Stechishin |
ex officio | Invited Guests | Observers | HL7 Staff | ||||
. | Stan Huff (HL7 Chair) w/vote | x | MaryKay McDaniel | . | obs1 | x | Anne Wizauer |
. | Don Mon (Vice Chair) |
. | . | . | obs2 | . | |
. | Chuck Jaffe (CEO) |
. | . | . | . | ||
Agenda
Housekeeping
- Introduction of visitors (including declaration of interests)
- Agenda review and approval -
- Approve Minutes of 2014-11-03 TSC Call Agenda
Governance
- Approval items:
- Discussion topics:
- MaryKay McDaniel will join to discuss implementation timeline for BAM
- TSC representatives to the Nomination Committee - must identify two candidates before end of year for election in January
- Proposals
- Continue discussion of FHIR Core WG proposal including Lloyd's draft of FHIR Core Mission and Charter
Management
- Review action items –
- Calvin to forward back the naming conventions proposal document to the group for review
- Paul and Andy to review external links issue
- Approval items:
- Project Approval Request for ISO Identification of Medicinal Products (IDMP) Technical Specifications and EU/EMA Requirements for SPL Release 7 for RCRIM WG of DESD at Project Insight 1147 and TSC Tracker 3723
- Approval items from e-vote ending 11/7/14 referred for discussion:
- Project approval request for HL7 Clinical Document Architecture, Release 2.1, for Structured Docs WG of SSD SD, at Project Insight 1150 and TSC Tracker 3676: Concern raised by Andy regarding backwards compatability/clarity on datatypes.
- Approval Items from e-Vote ending 11/7/14: Approved 5/0/0 with CTO, DESD, T3SD, and 2 Affiliate voting
- Project approval request for Measure Report Profile using FHIR, for CQI WG of DESD, at Project Insight 1140 and TSC Tracker 3657
- Project approval request for CQF-based HQMF Implementation Guide, for CQI WG of DESD, at Project Insight 1142 and TSC Tracker 3660
- Project approval request for EMS Patient Care Report Release Two, for CIC WG of DESD, at Project Insight 1151 andTSC Tracker 3668
- Project approval request for Project Scope Statement for: C-CDA on FHIR, for Structured Docs WG of SSD SD, at Project Insight 1122 and TSC Tracker 3677
- Project Approval Request for EHR System Functional Model - Security and Privacy Joint Vocabulary Alignment at Project Insight TBD and TSC Tracker 3718
- Informative Publication Request for HL7 Domain Analysis Model: Health Quality Improvement, Release 1 for CQI WG of DESD at Project Insight 1045 and TSC Tracker 3711
- DSTU Publication Extension Request for HL7 Implementation Guide for CDA Release 2: Quality Reporting Document Architecture – Category III, DSTU Release 1 - US Realm at Project Insight 210 and TSC Tracker 3690.
- Discussion topics:
- Issues regarding FHIR DSTU timeline - Melva Peters
- Request that we create a use case repository
- Initial review of the list of ballot approvals for January 2015
Reports: (attach written reports below from Steering Divisions et al.)
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
- Minutes review: Minutes accepted as approved.
- Guest Mary Kay McDaniel here to discuss BAM. Shared PPT presentation regarding issues around timeline for governance. Will we have one governance Board, or two – one for implementation and one for standard? What timeline will we follow? Ken asks if anyone would have a problem with a single governance board across all families, and would that Board be the TSC? Single board would lead to consistency; John R. suggests single governance with separate management. Paul agrees; suggests that we add four positions, one for each product line if we’re going to use the TSC. Pat suggests formalization of governance Board with mission statement/charter. Some concern about overextending volunteers. Ken asks MaryKay to ask her group to put together a mission and charter, plus some pros and cons of TSC owning that responsibility. Action: MaryKay agrees to take it back to the group for consideration. TSC will potentially review draft Sunday night at the TSC meeting in January.
- FHIR DSTU timeline: Melva and pharmacy group dissatisfied with the current timeline communication and expectations and suggestion that groups that don’t have material done on time will receive resource assistance from outside the WG. Some concerns were addressed late last week with the offer of submitting placeholders instead of full material for December, although some question the value of that. May 2015 is comment only ballot but might be delayed until September. Extended discussion over ballot timelines. Find out what requirements and drivers are. Action: Put question on USRTF agenda: Is there something that ONC is doing that is dependent on the next version of FHIR? Does the ONC have any material requirements for ballot timing for FHIR? Action: Lorraine to take the issue to the FGB for discussion. Action: Paul to discuss with FMG. Action: Put this on the TSC agenda for discussion next week.
- Use case repository request: what is the general feeling of the group? Paul thinks it would be valuable. Some concern around budgetary restraints and bandwidth. Must also balance with organizational priorities. Will need to gather more information regarding product family/product line as well. Put on Saturday agenda at WG meeting, as well as work going on with tooling strategy (Andy)
- Discussion regarding e-vote item Project approval request for HL7 Clinical Document Architecture, Release 2.1, for Structured Docs WG of SSD SD, at Project Insight 1150 and TSC Tracker 3676 being backwards compatible. Group came to conclusion that the project is approved but that there may be questions arising around the issue from other groups. Andy moves to approve the PSS with a note that these updates to the CDA specification institute a special case and we are approving it to use the RIM version from CDA R2 and datatypes R1 on that basis. Paul seconds. Anne to forward to WG.
- TSC reps to the nominating committee: Melva, Freida. Ken will send to the Board. Ken/Anne to add to TSC wiki.
- next week: FHIR Core WG proposal, ballot approvals for January15. Group to email concerns end of this week in advance of Monday’s call.
Call adjourned at 12:01.
Next Steps
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
| |||
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
© 2014 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.