Difference between revisions of "2014-02-12 TRAC"

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with '__NOTOC__ ==TSC Risk Assessment Committee (TRAC) Agenda/Minutes == back to TRAC page ===Meeting Info/Attendees=== Category:2014 TSC Minutes {|border="1" cellpad…')
 
Line 33: Line 33:
 
===Agenda===
 
===Agenda===
 
*Agenda review and approval - Pat Van Dyke  
 
*Agenda review and approval - Pat Van Dyke  
*Review minutes of [[2014-01-08 TRAC]]  
+
*Review minutes of [[2014-02-05 TRAC]]  
 
*Action Items:
 
*Action Items:
 
**Pat will work on developing a straw man for separate criteria for informative ballot reconciliation in 6 months, for example.  
 
**Pat will work on developing a straw man for separate criteria for informative ballot reconciliation in 6 months, for example.  

Revision as of 15:01, 12 February 2014

TSC Risk Assessment Committee (TRAC) Agenda/Minutes

back to TRAC page

Meeting Info/Attendees

TRAC Meeting Minutes

Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371#

Date: Wednesday, 2014-02-12
Time: 10:00 AM U.S. Eastern
Facilitator: Pat Van Dyke Note taker(s): Lynn
Quorum n/a
Chair/CTO Members Members
Pat Van Dyke Rick Haddorff Melva Peters
John Quinn Austin Kreisler Ken McCaslin

Agenda

  • Agenda review and approval - Pat Van Dyke
  • Review minutes of 2014-02-05 TRAC
  • Action Items:
    • Pat will work on developing a straw man for separate criteria for informative ballot reconciliation in 6 months, for example.
    • Melva will re-review the T3F risks and give a first draft on impact and likelihood for review on the next call.
    • Pat will ping Ken to send a reminder on the WGM Minutes deadline Friday
    • Pat and Lynn will review further offline for wording and review again next Wednesday.
    • Pat will provide feedback to Mike and Pete on appropriate level of agenda detail in the room scheduling app
  • Review 20140205 risk spreadsheet
  • TSC referred action:
    • WG Balloting metric: bundling together other PBS metrics measures including balloting in previous cycles, submitting PSS on time and NIBs on time, etc
      • Ballot quality assessment consideration as a governance point/work group health metric/strategic initiatives dashboard metric. Larger sample size, Other measures the TRAC might assess are % of negatives less than 20, or ballots not returned versus negative balloters.
      • Discuss outreach to ballot evaluators on what additional ballot quality measures should be performed.
  • CDA R3 vs CDA R2.1 and impact on US Realm and CCDA

Minutes

Minutes/Conclusions Reached:

  • Agenda review and approval -



Next Steps

Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items


© 2014 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved