Difference between revisions of "DESD PSS: CIC Trauma CDA"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*Summary - Passed (10/0/1/1) | *Summary - Passed (10/0/1/1) | ||
| − | **Number of participants: | + | **Number of participants: 12 |
**Most popular option: Affirmative | **Most popular option: Affirmative | ||
| − | **Votes in favor: | + | **Votes in favor: 11 |
**Comments: 1 | **Comments: 1 | ||
**Non-participating work groups counted as abstaining solely for the purpose of counting quorum: 0 | **Non-participating work groups counted as abstaining solely for the purpose of counting quorum: 0 | ||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
| Martin Hurrell (Anesthesia WG)||OK|||| | | Martin Hurrell (Anesthesia WG)||OK|||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | Count|| | + | | Floyd Eisenberg (CQI WG)||OK|||| |
| + | |- | ||
| + | | Count||11||1||0 | ||
|} | |} | ||
==Comments== | ==Comments== | ||
Revision as of 22:54, 13 May 2013
Please vote on the PSS for CIC. Enter your name and WG along with your vote. 1 vote per WG. Poll open until May 31, 2013 unless quorum is reached earlier.
Link to Document
PBS Metrics
PBS Metrics look good (see HL7Gforg site) - reviewed during DESD meeting in Atlanta
- Summary - Passed (10/0/1/1)
- Number of participants: 12
- Most popular option: Affirmative
- Votes in favor: 11
- Comments: 1
- Non-participating work groups counted as abstaining solely for the purpose of counting quorum: 0
| ' | Affirmative | Negative (with comments) | Abstain |
| edward helton RCRIM | OK | ||
| Dianne Reeves (CIC) | OK | ||
| Melva Peters (Pharmacy) | OK | ||
| Kevin Coonan, MD (Patient Care) | OK | ||
| Jim McKinley (AWG) | OK | ||
| Ken Pool (PHER) | OK | ||
| Mead Walker (PSWG) | OK | ||
| Craig Gabron (AWG) | OK | ||
| Dianne Reeves (CIC) | OK | ||
| Suzanne Gonzales-Webb (CBCC) | OK | ||
| Martin Hurrell (Anesthesia WG) | OK | ||
| Floyd Eisenberg (CQI WG) | OK | ||
| Count | 11 | 1 | 0 |
Comments
| Floyd Eisenberg - Monday, May 13, 2013 - 7:05:39 AM GMT-12:00 | The Project Scope Statement is fairly basic. I assume the time for discovering relationships to information within the EHR that support multiple uses (reuse or, as I recently recently heard it called, continuous use of health data). I agree with moving forward on the project with the expectation that consideration will be given to how to align with other related efforts, such as DEEDS as addressed by Kevin. |
| Kevin Coonan MD - Thursday, May 9, 2013 - 8:22:16 AM GMT-12:00" | HL7 needs to support interoperability of health information systems. Creation of a specification which applies to a very small number of sender platforms and a single sender doesn't require the efforts of a SDO. For this to be worth the effort for HL7 to engage it needs to have the potential to communicate beyond the very narrow scope. This will require harmonization with projects like DEEDS, which have a much broader scope. This work should anticipate other uses of the desired content and other uses. |
