Difference between revisions of "20121114 TSC Risk Assessment call"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
|colspan="2"|Facilitators ||colspan="2"|ArB ||colspan="2"|Members||colspan="2"|Members | |colspan="2"|Facilitators ||colspan="2"|ArB ||colspan="2"|Members||colspan="2"|Members | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | ||Austin Kreisler|| | + | |x ||Austin Kreisler||x|| Calvin Beebe || || Pat van Dyke |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | ||Jane Curry || | + | |x ||Jane Curry ||x || Ed Tripp || || || |
|} | |} | ||
===Agenda=== | ===Agenda=== | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
*See links | *See links | ||
===Minutes=== | ===Minutes=== | ||
| + | *Review the Ballot risks spreadsheet from Pat, on Chapter 14-16 of the GOM. - Pat is not available. | ||
| + | *Continue Review [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/7054/9837/ConsolidatedRiskAssessment.xlsx Consolidated risk assessment spreadsheet] | ||
| + | **Review of where left off last week | ||
| + | **TSC Policy, Project Approval Process, Poor communication with ANSI addressed last week | ||
| + | **SI2.1.3 Global adoption increased split into two - that version is not available; will update | ||
| + | **Next is SI2.1.5 Key stakeholder groups - two sets: members, internal to HL7; and stakeholders outside of HL7 who are not members are an external problem. It's not as critical as Austin feels our focus needs to be on providing value to our members. Value of HL7 membership is to get members' requirements into the HL7 standards. Divide this one into two. Mitigation for nonmembers is to communicate to them that their membership would allow their requirements to take priority within standards development. | ||
| + | **SI 2.2 streamline process, speed to develop. Jane notes that not everyone understands what the process is. Using too stringent a reconciliation process is one problem they face. Others feel their negative comments are steamrolled in the reconciliation process as declared not persuasive, as a Social-Political type. Austin suggests we have the technology to run the steamroller. Do we need to tease this into other entries? Three dimensions, including education which is under Resources. V3 artifact development and publication/balloting process is a technical exercise understood by a handful of people, and resource intensive. Technical development of the standard break out as resource type. Balloting is second item as social political type | ||
| + | **Continued discussion resulted in identifying internal risks as those of focus and may have to group all the external risks to address their impact on the organization. Set impact to low. | ||
| + | Being at time, adjourned at 9:59 AM | ||
===Next Steps=== | ===Next Steps=== | ||
| Line 42: | Line 51: | ||
|colspan="4" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/> | |colspan="4" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/> | ||
*[[20121121 TSC Risk Assessment call]]. | *[[20121121 TSC Risk Assessment call]]. | ||
| + | *Continue reviewing critical impact risks from updated spreadsheet at http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/7069/9859/ConsolidatedRiskAssessment20121114.xlsx | ||
| + | |||
|} | |} | ||
© 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved. | © 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved. | ||
Latest revision as of 15:05, 14 November 2012
TSC Risk Assessment Task Force Agenda/Minutes
| HL7 TSC Meeting Minutes Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371# |
Date: 2012-11-14 Time: 9:00 AM U.S. Eastern | |
| Facilitator: Austin Kreisler | Note taker(s): Lynn Laakso | |
| Quorum n/a | |||||||
| Facilitators | ArB | Members | Members | ||||
| x | Austin Kreisler | x | Calvin Beebe | Pat van Dyke | |||
| x | Jane Curry | x | Ed Tripp | ||||
Agenda
- Review the Ballot risks spreadsheet from Pat, on Chapter 14-16 of the GOM.
- Continue Review Consolidated risk assessment spreadsheet
Supporting Documents
- See links
Minutes
- Review the Ballot risks spreadsheet from Pat, on Chapter 14-16 of the GOM. - Pat is not available.
- Continue Review Consolidated risk assessment spreadsheet
- Review of where left off last week
- TSC Policy, Project Approval Process, Poor communication with ANSI addressed last week
- SI2.1.3 Global adoption increased split into two - that version is not available; will update
- Next is SI2.1.5 Key stakeholder groups - two sets: members, internal to HL7; and stakeholders outside of HL7 who are not members are an external problem. It's not as critical as Austin feels our focus needs to be on providing value to our members. Value of HL7 membership is to get members' requirements into the HL7 standards. Divide this one into two. Mitigation for nonmembers is to communicate to them that their membership would allow their requirements to take priority within standards development.
- SI 2.2 streamline process, speed to develop. Jane notes that not everyone understands what the process is. Using too stringent a reconciliation process is one problem they face. Others feel their negative comments are steamrolled in the reconciliation process as declared not persuasive, as a Social-Political type. Austin suggests we have the technology to run the steamroller. Do we need to tease this into other entries? Three dimensions, including education which is under Resources. V3 artifact development and publication/balloting process is a technical exercise understood by a handful of people, and resource intensive. Technical development of the standard break out as resource type. Balloting is second item as social political type
- Continued discussion resulted in identifying internal risks as those of focus and may have to group all the external risks to address their impact on the organization. Set impact to low.
Being at time, adjourned at 9:59 AM
Next Steps
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
| |||
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
© 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.
