Difference between revisions of "2011-09-26 TSC Call Minutes"

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
===Meeting Info/Attendees===
 
===Meeting Info/Attendees===
{{:TSC Meetings}}
+
   [[Category:2011 TSC Minutes]]
   [[Category:2011 TSC Minutes|Agenda Template]]
 
  
 
{|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"  
 
{|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"  
Line 24: Line 23:
 
|width="0%"|'''Affiliation'''
 
|width="0%"|'''Affiliation'''
 
|-
 
|-
|?||Calvin Beebe||HL7 SSD SD Co-Chair
+
|x||Calvin Beebe||HL7 SSD SD Co-Chair
 
|-
 
|-
|?||Woody Beeler||HL7 FTSD Co-Chair
+
|x||Woody Beeler||HL7 FTSD Co-Chair
 
|-
 
|-
|?||Bob Dolin||HL7 Board Chair
+
| ||Bob Dolin||HL7 Board Chair
 
|-
 
|-
|?||Freida Hall||invited guest, HL7 T3SD SD Co-Chair-elect
+
|x ||Freida Hall||invited guest, HL7 T3SD SD Co-Chair-elect
 
|-
 
|-
|?||Tony Julian||HL7 FTSD Co-Chair
+
|x||Tony Julian||HL7 FTSD Co-Chair
 
|-
 
|-
|?||Austin Kreisler||HL7 TSC Chair, DESD Co-Chair
+
|x||Austin Kreisler||HL7 TSC Chair, DESD Co-Chair
 
|-
 
|-
|?||Lynn Laakso ||HL7 staff support
+
|x||Lynn Laakso ||HL7 staff support
 
|-
 
|-
|?||Patrick Loyd|| HL7 T3SD Co-Chair
+
|x ||Patrick Loyd|| HL7 T3SD Co-Chair
 
|-
 
|-
|?||Ken McCaslin||HL7 T3SD Co-Chair
+
|x||Ken McCaslin||HL7 T3SD Co-Chair
 
|-
 
|-
|?||Charlie Mead||HL7 ArB Chair
+
| x||Charlie Mead||HL7 ArB Chair
 
|-
 
|-
|?||Ravi Natarajan||HL7 Affiliate Representative
+
| x||Ravi Natarajan||HL7 Affiliate Representative
 
|-
 
|-
|?||Ron Parker||HL7 ArB Alternate
+
| ||Ron Parker||HL7 ArB Alternate
 
|-
 
|-
|?||John Quinn||HL7 CTO
+
|x||John Quinn||HL7 CTO
 
|-
 
|-
|?||Ed Tripp||HL7 DESD Co-Chair
+
|x||Ed Tripp||HL7 DESD Co-Chair
 
|-
 
|-
|?||Pat Van Dyke||HL7 SSD SD Co-Chair
+
|x||Pat Van Dyke||HL7 SSD SD Co-Chair
 
|-
 
|-
|?||Mead Walker||invited guest, HL7 DESD SD Co-Chair-elect
+
| ||Mead Walker||invited guest, HL7 DESD SD Co-Chair-elect
 
|-
 
|-
|?||Jay Zimmerman || HL7 Affiliate Representative
+
|regrets||Jay Zimmerman || HL7 Affiliate Representative
 
|-
 
|-
| || ||  
+
|x ||Hugh Glover || Pharmacy guest
 
|-
 
|-
| || ||
+
|x || Brian Pech||observer
 
|-
 
|-
 
|colspan="3" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|
 
|colspan="3" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|
Line 68: Line 67:
 
{|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"  
 
{|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"  
 
|-
 
|-
|colspan="3" |'''Quorum Requirements (Chair +5 with 2 SD Reps) Met: '''(yes/No)
+
|colspan="3" |'''Quorum Requirements (Chair +5 with 2 SD Reps) Met: '''yes
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 120: Line 119:
 
===Minutes===
 
===Minutes===
 
'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/>
 
'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/>
 +
'''Agenda Topics''' <br/>
 +
#Introduction of visitors (including declaration of interests) – Hugh Glover of Pharmacy
 +
#Agenda review and approval - Austin Kreisler
 +
#*Innovations meeting space, under Discussion topics.
 +
#Approve Minutes
 +
#*[[2011-08-29_TSC_Call_Agenda]] '''VOTE: ''' unanimously approved
 +
#*Block '''VOTE: ''' Ravi abstains. Approved 6/0/1
 +
#** [http://hl7t3f.org/wiki/index.php?title=2011-09-13_TSC_WGM_Agenda 2011-09-13 TSC Luncheon Meeting Agenda]
 +
#** [http://hl7t3f.org/wiki/index.php?title=2011-09-12_TSC_WGM_Agenda 2011-09-12 Co-Chairs Meeting Agenda]
 +
#** [http://hl7t3f.org/wiki/index.php?title=2011-09-11_TSC_WGM_Agenda 2011-09-11 TSC Sunday Evening Meeting]
 +
#** [http://hl7t3f.org/wiki/index.php?title=2011-09-11_TSC_WGM_SDO_Activities_Agenda 2011-09-11 TSC Activities with Other SDOs] Sunday Q4
 +
#** 2011-09-10 TSC WGM [http://hl7tsc.org/wiki/index.php?title=2011-09-10_TSC_WGM_Agenda Agenda], Saturday Meeting
 +
#Review [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemBrowse&tracker_id=494 action items] –
 +
#*WGM action items
 +
#**Strategic Dashboard criteria metrics recommendations:
 +
#***WGM effectiveness – Patrick
 +
#***Woody will take the Product Quality criteria
 +
#***Requirements traceability and cross-artifact consistency – Austin
 +
#***Industry responsiveness and easier implementation: Ken with John’s help
 +
#**Lynn will set these up as tracker items To-Do.  When does the project need to have these criteria defined in order to move forward. Ken thinks we need draft criteria by Oct 31st for review by Thanksgiving with time for review before WGM. Need a reminder for October 24th.
 +
#**Project Services delegated tasks: how the Steering Divisions can use the PBS metrics information to evaluate, capture info on project scope statement to indicate that material was a former realm standard
 +
#***Freida notes that it is on the Project Services’ list of things to work on.  Tracking realm will be on the 2012 project scope statement. How to use the metrics, when should that be completed? Let’s have a draft for October 31st.
 +
<!--              -->
 +
<!--    Approvals  -->
 +
#Approval items:
 +
#*Informative Document [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/2050/8713/HL7_Publication_Request_SAIF-CD-Informative.doc Publication Request]: HL7 Services-Aware Interoperability Framework: Canonical Version, Release 1, for the Architecture Review Board (ArB), at [http://www.hl7.org/special/Committees/projman/searchableProjectIndex.cfm?action=edit&ProjectNumber=746 Project Insight # 746], [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=2050 TSC Tracker # 2050]. 
 +
#**Tony and Charlie address the request. The informative document does not have language about how a particular IG would be judged as compliant. That will have to be added for the DSTU ballot. Ed notes that there are 30 negatives remaining? They have not been notified to withdraw their negative? Perhaps they were not notified through the ballot desktop.  Tony and Charlie will address the notification of withdrawal of negatives. All comments have been addressed. The behavior of the ballot desktop tally page was discussed.  '''Tabled until next week. '''
 +
#*Project Approval Requests:
 +
#**[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/2045/8703/HL7PSS-BehavioralHealthDAMandCCDv1.docx HL7 Behavioral Health Domain Analysis Model, Messages, and CDA Profiles] for Financial Management WG at [http://www.hl7.org/special/Committees/projman/searchableProjectIndex.cfm?action=edit&ProjectNumber=800 Project Insight # 800] and [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=2045 TSC Tracker # 2045].  Cosponsored by CBCC and SDWG
 +
#**:Calvin addresses the scope statement for SSD SD.  Austin’s concern is that it is Realm-specific but it is touching a universal realm CMET. They can use the existing CMET and capture requirements if they find additional requirements for the future for the Universal CMET.  Creation of constraints on the UV CMET is acceptable for realm-specific. If they need different elements in the CMET when mapping the message into the CDA model then Success Criteria should be clarified. We could also clarify the scope to indicate balloting to CMETs would be a future project. '''MOTION:  ''' Calvin moves approval with that amended clarification. Patrick seconds.
 +
#**:'''VOTE ''': unanimously approved.
 +
#**[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/2046/8706/HL7PSSAttachments.doc HL7/Attachments using CDA Templates for Implementation Guides (based on CCD)] for Attachments WG at [http://www.hl7.org/special/Committees/projman/searchableProjectIndex.cfm?action=edit&ProjectNumber=805 Project Insight # 805] and [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=2046 TSC Tracker # 2046].  Cosponsored by SDWG
 +
#**:Ed addresses this project for DESD. This is anticipated to produce many templates and will be a long-running project with a timeline forecasted only until January 2013; this is thought to be quite aggressive, but Calvin adds that there is a government constraint. John notes CMS has been sitting on this for 15 years. Calvin notes they will use existing CDA documents where they apply.  Additional information at bottom of document requests funding from HL7 so there are other considerations. A budget will need to be submitted to the Finance and Executive Committees.  The task list needs more realistic dates. One of the requirements for DESD approval was putting the scope into the most recent template. Lynn will verify this and the updated task dates. Ed moves approval with those caveats, (budget funding goes to Finance for approval, public document to EC, task dates updated) Woody seconds.
 +
#**: '''VOTE: ''' unanimously approved.
 +
#**Charlie leaves the call.
 +
#**[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/2047/8707/2011SeptPharmacyImpl1C1B8F.doc Guidance on Implementation of Pharmacy Domain Messages] for Pharmacy WG at Project Insight #TBD, [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=2047 TSC Tracker # 2047].
 +
#**:Hugh addresses this project scope from DESD. This guidance can serve as a convenient access point for those who are developing pharmacy messages, or using pharmacy messages as examples.  Ravi asks why only a wiki and not an implementation guide. Hugh notes that it will evolve and change on a regular basis and so will not remain timely.  Email threads clarifying a particular topic of conversation can be added dynamically. The committee is not opposed to a formal published version at some point but not initially as they’re concerned about content. Ravi asks if this is on ITS R1 or something more widespread. Hugh notes that the timing issue in the current ballot is a separate page on the wiki rather than in the ballot introductory material. A matrix of architectures and process issues will be moved to the wiki instead of the ballot material. Austin has concerns with resurfacing ballot content on the wiki that will circumvent HL7 IP. Taking descriptions of aspects of the standard and putting it on a wiki removes the need to refer to the standard. There are IP assertions on the wiki but more explicit assertions can be made. Ravi would prefer we have a single stream for implementation guidance.
 +
#**:'''Vote: ''' unanimously approved.
 +
#**[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/2048/8708/HL7_PSS_CBCC_refactor_confcode.doc Refactor HL7 Confidentiality Concept Domain, Code System, & Value sets] for CBCC at [http://www.hl7.org/special/Committees/projman/searchableProjectIndex.cfm?action=edit&ProjectNumber=798 Project Insight ID# 798],  (or 529)???) [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=2048 TSC Tracker # 2048]. Cosponsored by Security and Vocabulary WGs
 +
#**:Ed addresses this project for DESD. A revision to current material to provide analysis of current concepts and make distinctions for patient-centric information. They will produce harmonization proposals that will be incorporated into RIM Ballot.
 +
#**:'''Vote: ''' unanimously approved.
 +
#*Project/Ballot withdrawal Requests:
 +
#**Block vote on first three
 +
#***[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/2042/8700/ANSI_proposal_withdrawalPHERproj186.doc V3: Public Health; Case Management, Release 1] for Public Health and Emergency Response WG, at [http://www.hl7.org/special/Committees/projman/searchableProjectIndex.cfm?action=edit&ProjectNumber=186 PI# 186], [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=2042 TSC Tracker # 2042]
 +
#***[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/2044/8702/ANSI_proposal_withdrawalPHERproj278.doc HL7 Version 3 Standard: Public Health; Investigation Request, Release 1] for Public Health and Emergency Response WG, at [http://www.hl7.org/special/Committees/projman/searchableProjectIndex.cfm?action=edit&ProjectNumber=278 PI# 278], [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=2044 TSC Tracker # 2044]
 +
#***[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/2043/8701/ANSI_proposal_withdrawalPHER_proj187.doc HL7 Version 3 Standard: Public Health; Outbreak Management, Release 1] for Public Health and Emergency Response WG, at [http://www.hl7.org/special/Committees/projman/searchableProjectIndex.cfm?action=edit&ProjectNumber=187 PI# 187], [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=2043 TSC Tracker # 2043]
 +
#**'''VOTE: '''unanimously approved
 +
#**[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/2051/8714/ANSI_proposal_withdrawal-CDISCtoMessageSubjectData.doc HL7 Version 3 Standard: Regulated Studies; CDISC Content to Message - Subject Data, Release 1], for RCRIM, at [http://www.hl7.org/special/Committees/projman/searchableProjectIndex.cfm?action=edit&ProjectNumber=205 PI # 205], [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=2051 TSC Tracker # 2051]
 +
#**:Ed notes that they will redefine these as CDA R2 documents.
 +
#**:'''VOTE: '''unanimously approved
 +
#*(actually belongs under approvals, not withdrawals)'''''In-Committee Approval''''' for [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/2054/8722/HL7PSSMnMIR4Hproject.doc Interoperability Resources for Healthcare] endorsement as co-sponsor with MnM, at [http://www.hl7.org/special/Committees/projman/searchableProjectIndex.cfm?action=edit&ProjectNumber=809 PI# 809], [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=2054&start=0 TSC Tracker #2054]
 +
#**Austin stresses the strategic importance of the project. Woody concurs
 +
#**:'''Vote: ''' unanimously endorsed cosponsorship.
 +
<!--              -->
 +
<!--  Discussion  -->
 +
#Discussion topics:
 +
#*TSC Chair nominations: entertain motion to close nomination period and vote on 2012-2013 TSC Chair.  '''tabled to next week'''
 +
#*Innovations meeting space – not needed; vote on project '''tabled to next week'''
 +
#Reports: (attach written reports below from Steering Divisions et al.)
 +
#*Publication for successful normative ballot by InM for Reaffirmation of V3 Master File/Registry Infrastructure, Release 1 (informative only, no TSC action needed)
 +
<!-- #WGM Planning - -->
 +
#[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemBrowse&tracker_id=313 Open Issues List]
  
  
'''''Please don't forget to hang up from the conference call '' (VOIP users)'''
 
 
===Next Steps===
 
===Next Steps===
 
{|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"  
 
{|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|colspan="4" |'''Actions''' ''(Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)''<br/>
 
|colspan="4" |'''Actions''' ''(Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)''<br/>
* .
+
*Lynn will set these Strategic Dashboard criteria metrics recommendations up as tracker items To-Do for 10/31. Need a reminder for October 24th.
 +
*One of the requirements for DESD approval of CDA Attachments was putting the scope into the most recent template. Lynn will verify this and the updated task dates
 
|-
 
|-
 
|colspan="4" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/>
 
|colspan="4" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/>
*.
+
* TSC Chair nominations: entertain motion to close nomination period and vote on 2012-2013 TSC Chair. 
 +
* Innovations project.
 +
*[[2011-10-03 TSC Call Agenda]].
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 17:39, 26 September 2011

TSC Agenda/Minutes

Meeting Info/Attendees

HL7 TSC Meeting Minutes

Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 124466#
GoToMeeting ID: 165-215-206

Date: 2011-09-26
Time: 11:00 AM U.S. Eastern
Facilitator: Austin Kreisler Note taker(s): Lynn Laakso
Attendee Name Affiliation
x Calvin Beebe HL7 SSD SD Co-Chair
x Woody Beeler HL7 FTSD Co-Chair
Bob Dolin HL7 Board Chair
x Freida Hall invited guest, HL7 T3SD SD Co-Chair-elect
x Tony Julian HL7 FTSD Co-Chair
x Austin Kreisler HL7 TSC Chair, DESD Co-Chair
x Lynn Laakso HL7 staff support
x Patrick Loyd HL7 T3SD Co-Chair
x Ken McCaslin HL7 T3SD Co-Chair
x Charlie Mead HL7 ArB Chair
x Ravi Natarajan HL7 Affiliate Representative
Ron Parker HL7 ArB Alternate
x John Quinn HL7 CTO
x Ed Tripp HL7 DESD Co-Chair
x Pat Van Dyke HL7 SSD SD Co-Chair
Mead Walker invited guest, HL7 DESD SD Co-Chair-elect
regrets Jay Zimmerman HL7 Affiliate Representative
x Hugh Glover Pharmacy guest
x Brian Pech observer


Quorum Requirements (Chair +5 with 2 SD Reps) Met: yes

Agenda

Agenda Topics

  1. Introduction of visitors (including declaration of interests)
  2. Agenda review and approval - Austin Kreisler
  3. Approve Minutes
  4. Review action items
    • WGM action items
      • Strategic Dashboard criteria metrics recommendations:
        • WGM effectiveness – Patrick
        • Woody will take the Product Quality criteria
        • Requirements traceability and cross-artifact consistency – Austin
        • Industry responsiveness and easier implementation: Ken with John’s help
      • Project Services delegated tasks: how the Steering Divisions can use the PBS metrics information to evaluate, capture info on project scope statement to indicate that material was a former realm standard
  5. Approval items:
  6. Discussion topics:
    • TSC Chair nominations: entertain motion to close nomination period and vote on 2012-2013 TSC Chair.
  7. Reports: (attach written reports below from Steering Divisions et al.)
    • Publication for successful normative ballot by InM for Reaffirmation of V3 Master File/Registry Infrastructure, Release 1 (informative only, no TSC action needed)
  8. Open Issues List


Supporting Documents

  • See links

Minutes

Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
Agenda Topics

  1. Introduction of visitors (including declaration of interests) – Hugh Glover of Pharmacy
  2. Agenda review and approval - Austin Kreisler
    • Innovations meeting space, under Discussion topics.
  3. Approve Minutes
  4. Review action items
    • WGM action items
      • Strategic Dashboard criteria metrics recommendations:
        • WGM effectiveness – Patrick
        • Woody will take the Product Quality criteria
        • Requirements traceability and cross-artifact consistency – Austin
        • Industry responsiveness and easier implementation: Ken with John’s help
      • Lynn will set these up as tracker items To-Do. When does the project need to have these criteria defined in order to move forward. Ken thinks we need draft criteria by Oct 31st for review by Thanksgiving with time for review before WGM. Need a reminder for October 24th.
      • Project Services delegated tasks: how the Steering Divisions can use the PBS metrics information to evaluate, capture info on project scope statement to indicate that material was a former realm standard
        • Freida notes that it is on the Project Services’ list of things to work on. Tracking realm will be on the 2012 project scope statement. How to use the metrics, when should that be completed? Let’s have a draft for October 31st.
  5. Approval items:
    • Informative Document Publication Request: HL7 Services-Aware Interoperability Framework: Canonical Version, Release 1, for the Architecture Review Board (ArB), at Project Insight # 746, TSC Tracker # 2050.
      • Tony and Charlie address the request. The informative document does not have language about how a particular IG would be judged as compliant. That will have to be added for the DSTU ballot. Ed notes that there are 30 negatives remaining? They have not been notified to withdraw their negative? Perhaps they were not notified through the ballot desktop. Tony and Charlie will address the notification of withdrawal of negatives. All comments have been addressed. The behavior of the ballot desktop tally page was discussed. Tabled until next week.
    • Project Approval Requests:
      • HL7 Behavioral Health Domain Analysis Model, Messages, and CDA Profiles for Financial Management WG at Project Insight # 800 and TSC Tracker # 2045. Cosponsored by CBCC and SDWG
        Calvin addresses the scope statement for SSD SD. Austin’s concern is that it is Realm-specific but it is touching a universal realm CMET. They can use the existing CMET and capture requirements if they find additional requirements for the future for the Universal CMET. Creation of constraints on the UV CMET is acceptable for realm-specific. If they need different elements in the CMET when mapping the message into the CDA model then Success Criteria should be clarified. We could also clarify the scope to indicate balloting to CMETs would be a future project. MOTION: Calvin moves approval with that amended clarification. Patrick seconds.
        VOTE : unanimously approved.
      • HL7/Attachments using CDA Templates for Implementation Guides (based on CCD) for Attachments WG at Project Insight # 805 and TSC Tracker # 2046. Cosponsored by SDWG
        Ed addresses this project for DESD. This is anticipated to produce many templates and will be a long-running project with a timeline forecasted only until January 2013; this is thought to be quite aggressive, but Calvin adds that there is a government constraint. John notes CMS has been sitting on this for 15 years. Calvin notes they will use existing CDA documents where they apply. Additional information at bottom of document requests funding from HL7 so there are other considerations. A budget will need to be submitted to the Finance and Executive Committees. The task list needs more realistic dates. One of the requirements for DESD approval was putting the scope into the most recent template. Lynn will verify this and the updated task dates. Ed moves approval with those caveats, (budget funding goes to Finance for approval, public document to EC, task dates updated) Woody seconds.
        VOTE: unanimously approved.
      • Charlie leaves the call.
      • Guidance on Implementation of Pharmacy Domain Messages for Pharmacy WG at Project Insight #TBD, TSC Tracker # 2047.
        Hugh addresses this project scope from DESD. This guidance can serve as a convenient access point for those who are developing pharmacy messages, or using pharmacy messages as examples. Ravi asks why only a wiki and not an implementation guide. Hugh notes that it will evolve and change on a regular basis and so will not remain timely. Email threads clarifying a particular topic of conversation can be added dynamically. The committee is not opposed to a formal published version at some point but not initially as they’re concerned about content. Ravi asks if this is on ITS R1 or something more widespread. Hugh notes that the timing issue in the current ballot is a separate page on the wiki rather than in the ballot introductory material. A matrix of architectures and process issues will be moved to the wiki instead of the ballot material. Austin has concerns with resurfacing ballot content on the wiki that will circumvent HL7 IP. Taking descriptions of aspects of the standard and putting it on a wiki removes the need to refer to the standard. There are IP assertions on the wiki but more explicit assertions can be made. Ravi would prefer we have a single stream for implementation guidance.
        Vote: unanimously approved.
      • Refactor HL7 Confidentiality Concept Domain, Code System, & Value sets for CBCC at Project Insight ID# 798, (or 529)???) TSC Tracker # 2048. Cosponsored by Security and Vocabulary WGs
        Ed addresses this project for DESD. A revision to current material to provide analysis of current concepts and make distinctions for patient-centric information. They will produce harmonization proposals that will be incorporated into RIM Ballot.
        Vote: unanimously approved.
    • Project/Ballot withdrawal Requests:
    • (actually belongs under approvals, not withdrawals)In-Committee Approval for Interoperability Resources for Healthcare endorsement as co-sponsor with MnM, at PI# 809, TSC Tracker #2054
      • Austin stresses the strategic importance of the project. Woody concurs
        Vote: unanimously endorsed cosponsorship.
  6. Discussion topics:
    • TSC Chair nominations: entertain motion to close nomination period and vote on 2012-2013 TSC Chair. tabled to next week
    • Innovations meeting space – not needed; vote on project tabled to next week
  7. Reports: (attach written reports below from Steering Divisions et al.)
    • Publication for successful normative ballot by InM for Reaffirmation of V3 Master File/Registry Infrastructure, Release 1 (informative only, no TSC action needed)
  8. Open Issues List


Next Steps

Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
  • Lynn will set these Strategic Dashboard criteria metrics recommendations up as tracker items To-Do for 10/31. Need a reminder for October 24th.
  • One of the requirements for DESD approval of CDA Attachments was putting the scope into the most recent template. Lynn will verify this and the updated task dates
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
  • TSC Chair nominations: entertain motion to close nomination period and vote on 2012-2013 TSC Chair.
  • Innovations project.
  • 2011-10-03 TSC Call Agenda.