Difference between revisions of "FTSD-ConCall-20110308"

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 128: Line 128:
 
#''(15 min)'' '''ITS R2B PSS'''
 
#''(15 min)'' '''ITS R2B PSS'''
 
#''(15 min)'' '''Ebxml R2 PSS'''  
 
#''(15 min)'' '''Ebxml R2 PSS'''  
#''(5 min)'' '''Info Model Propoerties PSS'''
+
#''(5 min)'' '''Info Model Properties PSS'''
 
#''(5 min)'' '''MLLP Refresh PSS'''
 
#''(5 min)'' '''MLLP Refresh PSS'''
  
 
===[[FTSD Agenda item list|Agenda items]]===
 
===[[FTSD Agenda item list|Agenda items]]===
 
===[[FTSD Action item list|Action Item List]]===
 
===[[FTSD Action item list|Action Item List]]===
 +
 
==Minutes==
 
==Minutes==
 
#Approve [[FTSD-ConCall-201ymmDD| Previous Minutes]] & Accept Agenda
 
#Approve [[FTSD-ConCall-201ymmDD| Previous Minutes]] & Accept Agenda

Revision as of 17:48, 8 March 2011

Fndn&Tech Steering Divn - Conference Call (date above)

Meeting Information

Conference Call is scheduled for 0.5 hour,
Tuesday 12:00 PM to be repeated every other week
Please consult http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock for your local times
HL7 Conference Call Service
Phone Number: +1 770-657-9270 (Passcode: 943627)
Online Meeting Service - GoToMeeting
https://www2.gotomeeting.com/join/385800034 (GoToMeeting ID: 385-800-034)


Steering Division Members:

  • Application Integration & Design (AID)
  • Implementable Technology Specifications (ITS)
  • Conformance & Guidance for Implementation/Testing(CGIT)
  • Infrastructure & Messaging (InM)
  • Modeling & Methodology (MnM)
  • Security
  • Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)
  • Templates
  • Vocabulary

Attendees

P. Committee
Implementable Technology Specifications (ITS)
X Paul Knapp
X Dale Nelson
. Andy Stechishin
Implementation/Conformance
. Wendy Huang
. Frank Oemig
. Melva Peters
. Rober Snelick
Infrastructure and Messaging
. Patrick Loyd
X Tony Julian
. Dave Shaver
X Sandy Stuart
Modeling & Methodology (MnM)
X Woody Beeler
. Jean Duteau
. Lloyd McKenzie
. Ravi Tatarajan
. Ioan Singureanu
RIM-Based Application Architecture (RIMBAA)
. Peter Hendler MD
. Amnon Shabo PhD
. Rene Spronk
Security
. Bernd Blobel PhD
X John Moehrke
Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)
. Don Jorgenson
. Ken Rubin
. Ann Wrightson
. Galen Mulrooney
Templates
. Mark Shafarman
. Douglas Baird
Vocabulary
. James Case
. Heather Grain
. Russell Hamm
. William Ted Klein
X Beverly Knight
. Rob Hausam
Guests
X Lynn Laakso
X Gunther Shadow
X Theresa Brunone
X Randy Levin
X Keith Thomas
X Peggy Lesizer
X Lee Stevens
. .=Absent

Agenda

  1. (05 min) Roll Call
  2. (05 min) Approve Previous Minutes & Accept Agenda
  3. (15 min) Min Feb 22
  4. (15 min) ITS R2B PSS
  5. (15 min) Ebxml R2 PSS
  6. (5 min) Info Model Properties PSS
  7. (5 min) MLLP Refresh PSS

Agenda items

Action Item List

Minutes

  1. Approve Previous Minutes & Accept Agenda
  2. Min Feb 22 Approved (Tony/Sandy) with no objections.
  3. ITS R2B PSS
    1. Paul Knapp - Project scope is to provide its specifications that are wire-backwards-compatible to ITS Structures R1.1.
    2. Tony Assumed Chair: Woody/Mnm raised questions - refered to MnM_Minutes_CC_20110302.
    3. Woody: What happens if i send a full-featured R@ to a RR1 parser?
    4. Paul: It will blow up.
    5. Gunther: It may have unknown behaviour.
    6. Paul: It will look the same. If not, it would not be backward-compatible.
    7. Woody: We dont have a v3 rule to ignores things you dont recognize. It should be used for backward-compatibility, not for new implementations, and not a true fork.
    8. Gunther: the fork exists - people will have to deal with two its's.
    9. Paul: I see the end of one thing, and the start of another:
  4. Elise:SDL is a standard. FDA has implemented. As new partners come on, we add new functionality. Using the old specification is no change. Adding a component for devices - providers want to add on new functionality without retooling.
    1. Woody: From the HL7 this should be limited to use cases like you state, but not for all new specifications. HL7's perspective is using datatypes-r2 using itsr2 is the direction.
    2. Gunther Schadow:The issue from the FDA perspective is that there is a whole array of products being used by FDA. They would like to re-use the XML.
    3. Woody: If all new medications have to use this ITS it will destroy the ability to build interoerable standards. Long term, pharmacey needs to be in data-types R2.
    4. Gunther: CDA has the same issue.
    5. Paul: V2 people have the same issue. Should we require v2 coralaries for all v3 material.
    6. Gunther: That is what is being done.
    7. Paul: You should not buy an ipad2 now because the ipad3 will come out next fall? If we are going to take a position that the world must not change, then there is no point for V3.I see no problems with the items from MnM being used as guidelines.


  1. Ebxml R2 PSS
  2. Info Model Propoerties PSS
  3. MLLP Refresh PSS

Back to Meetings