Difference between revisions of "TSC SWOT"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
*Strengths | *Strengths | ||
| − | ** Respected membership | + | ** Respected, highly experienced membership |
** Committed membership | ** Committed membership | ||
** Support from board, HQ, and Work Group members | ** Support from board, HQ, and Work Group members | ||
** Responsive | ** Responsive | ||
| + | **Proactive | ||
*Weakness | *Weakness | ||
| Line 10: | Line 11: | ||
*Opportunities | *Opportunities | ||
| − | ** Linkage with | + | ** Linkage with Strategic Initiatives |
** Establish and drive Product Strategy | ** Establish and drive Product Strategy | ||
| + | **Improve Product Quality | ||
*Threats | *Threats | ||
| − | |||
** Creating overheads without visible return | ** Creating overheads without visible return | ||
| − | ** | + | ** (placeholder; PCAST or other such description) |
| − | + | ||
| + | Proposal for Approval by TSC 2010-12-20 | ||
Revision as of 17:01, 13 December 2010
- Strengths
- Respected, highly experienced membership
- Committed membership
- Support from board, HQ, and Work Group members
- Responsive
- Proactive
- Weakness
- Limited time
- Limited control over resources
- Opportunities
- Linkage with Strategic Initiatives
- Establish and drive Product Strategy
- Improve Product Quality
- Threats
- Creating overheads without visible return
- (placeholder; PCAST or other such description)
Proposal for Approval by TSC 2010-12-20
