Difference between revisions of "Infrastructure SD Agenda item list"

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
So far the technical work on what changes are worthwhile is being done, learning from over five years of implementation experience -- but the work on how to position those changes in the marketplace has not been done
 
So far the technical work on what changes are worthwhile is being done, learning from over five years of implementation experience -- but the work on how to position those changes in the marketplace has not been done
 +
 +
===Parking Lot ===
 +
#20110419 - [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/frsrelease/770/8220/2009SEP_PROJSCOPE_Vocab_DaveShaver_HarmonizeV2V3Vocab.doc 2009SEP_PROJSCOPE_Vocab_DaveShaver_HarmonizeV2V3Vocab.doc]
 +
#20110419 - [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/frsrelease/770/8218/2009SEP_PROJSCOPE_Vocab_BevKnight_BestPracticesforImplofVocab.doc 2009SEP_PROJSCOPE_Vocab_BevKnight_BestPracticesforImplofVocab.doc]
 +
 
==Resolved Items==
 
==Resolved Items==
 
=== Web Site Migration prioritization due October 22nd, 2007 ===
 
=== Web Site Migration prioritization due October 22nd, 2007 ===

Revision as of 16:41, 19 April 2011

Future Agenda Items

Enter your proposed agenda items, supporting documents, and the meeting/date when you expect the issue to the resolved:


Infrastructure Release (due to be closed at the San Diego WGM)

Please could the SD discuss the positioning of the various infrastructure revision projects that are underway. At the WGM I was tasked by INM TC and ITS SIG to raise this issue. There are a number of infrastructure improvements currently being worked on, that are likely to be published as DSTU in the next 6 months. It would seem sensible to promote these as a combined "major release", that is made normative and marketed as a single platform enhancement. Maybe other product lines could also be timed to be released at the same time.

So far the technical work on what changes are worthwhile is being done, learning from over five years of implementation experience -- but the work on how to position those changes in the marketplace has not been done

Parking Lot

  1. 20110419 - 2009SEP_PROJSCOPE_Vocab_DaveShaver_HarmonizeV2V3Vocab.doc
  2. 20110419 - 2009SEP_PROJSCOPE_Vocab_BevKnight_BestPracticesforImplofVocab.doc

Resolved Items

Web Site Migration prioritization due October 22nd, 2007

Harmonization (closed, included in the HDF)

Document and approve the current rules and processes for harmonization

  • Harmonization requests may follows the same process as described in the HDF = Change Control Process

7.4 Change Control Process.gif

Project Approval Process (closed)

  • --Ioana13 19:47, 29 October 2007 (PDT)
  • The project approval process was updated to reflect the new organizational structure
  • Charlie McCay would like to add some sort of capability to publish the scope statements during the approval process

Project Initiation and Approval draft V.2.gif


Back to Home Page