Difference between revisions of "2014-07-02 TRAC"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "{{subst::TRAC template}}") |
|||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| width="0%" colspan="2" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''TRAC Meeting Minutes''' <br/> | | width="0%" colspan="2" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''TRAC Meeting Minutes''' <br/> | ||
'''Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371#'''<br/> GoToMeeting ID: [https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/889380173 889-380-173] | '''Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371#'''<br/> GoToMeeting ID: [https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/889380173 889-380-173] | ||
− | | width="0%" colspan="1" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Date: Wednesday, 2014- | + | | width="0%" colspan="1" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Date: Wednesday, 2014-06-18'''<br/> '''Time: 10:00 AM U.S. Eastern''' |
|- | |- | ||
| width="0%" colspan="2" align="right"|'''Facilitator''': Pat Van Dyke | | width="0%" colspan="2" align="right"|'''Facilitator''': Pat Van Dyke | ||
− | | width="0%" colspan="1" align="right"|'''Note taker(s)''': | + | | width="0%" colspan="1" align="right"|'''Note taker(s)''': |
|} | |} | ||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
===Agenda=== | ===Agenda=== | ||
*Agenda review and approval - Pat Van Dyke | *Agenda review and approval - Pat Van Dyke | ||
− | *Review minutes of [[2014- | + | *Review minutes of [[2014-06-11 TRAC]] |
*Action Items: | *Action Items: | ||
− | ** | + | **Update on Generic WGM Checklist Calendar - Rick |
− | * | + | **Pat will work on developing a straw man for separate criteria for informative ballot reconciliation in 6 months, for example. |
+ | **Melva will re-review the T3F risks and give a first draft on impact and likelihood for review on the next call. | ||
+ | **Determine tracking metric on three pronged measure for minutes, meeting room requests (app still in beta) and agenda posting - review last cycle's data when Rick and Melva are on the call. | ||
+ | **Pat will circulate bullet points on WG Balloting combined metric prior to the meeting for review. | ||
+ | *Review late project submissions with Dave | ||
+ | *Review the use and definition of the columns in the governance points focusing on the ISM from [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/8237/12041/%43%6f%6e%73%6f%6c%69%64%61%74%65%64%52%69%73%6b%41%73%73%65%73%73%6d%65%6e%74%32%30%31%34%30%35%32%38%2e%78%6c%73%78 20140528 risk spreadsheet] | ||
+ | **precepts for the IP protection issues and address the related risks. | ||
+ | **Risk identification from recent XSLT vulnerability issue | ||
+ | **This group might identify the risks and suggest mitigations such as product family- or artifact-specific rules for versioning. | ||
+ | **Add to spreadsheet tracker the risk mitigations identified: | ||
+ | ***TSC addition of ISM to publication request should be added to a mitigation strategy for an existing risk or create a strategic risk to represent what it is meant to mitigate. | ||
+ | ***US Realm Task Force as mitigation to risk where US Realm does not have authority of an affiliate. | ||
+ | *TSC referred action: | ||
+ | **WG Balloting metric: bundling together other PBS metrics measures including balloting in previous cycles, submitting PSS on time and NIBs on time, etc using [http://lists.hl7.org/read/attachment/244475/2/BallotRecMiningForQuality.zip Ballot quality assessment] consideration as a governance point/work group health metric/strategic initiatives dashboard metric. Would measurements from before and after the changed process to disallow a single check box to enroll in all of the ballots be meaningful? Discussion deferred from TSC agenda 6/9. | ||
===Minutes=== | ===Minutes=== | ||
Line 54: | Line 67: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|colspan="4" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/> | |colspan="4" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/> | ||
− | *[[2014- | + | *[[2014-07-02 TRAC]]. No meeting June 25. |
|} | |} | ||
© 2014 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved | © 2014 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved |
Revision as of 20:11, 10 June 2014
TSC Risk Assessment Committee (TRAC) Agenda/Minutes
back to TRAC page
Meeting Info/Attendees
TRAC Meeting Minutes Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371# |
Date: Wednesday, 2014-06-18 Time: 10:00 AM U.S. Eastern | |
Facilitator: Pat Van Dyke | Note taker(s): |
Quorum | n/a | ||||
Chair/CTO | Members | Members | |||
Pat Van Dyke | Rick Haddorff | Melva Peters | |||
John Quinn | Austin Kreisler | Ken McCaslin | |||
Agenda
- Agenda review and approval - Pat Van Dyke
- Review minutes of 2014-06-11 TRAC
- Action Items:
- Update on Generic WGM Checklist Calendar - Rick
- Pat will work on developing a straw man for separate criteria for informative ballot reconciliation in 6 months, for example.
- Melva will re-review the T3F risks and give a first draft on impact and likelihood for review on the next call.
- Determine tracking metric on three pronged measure for minutes, meeting room requests (app still in beta) and agenda posting - review last cycle's data when Rick and Melva are on the call.
- Pat will circulate bullet points on WG Balloting combined metric prior to the meeting for review.
- Review late project submissions with Dave
- Review the use and definition of the columns in the governance points focusing on the ISM from 20140528 risk spreadsheet
- precepts for the IP protection issues and address the related risks.
- Risk identification from recent XSLT vulnerability issue
- This group might identify the risks and suggest mitigations such as product family- or artifact-specific rules for versioning.
- Add to spreadsheet tracker the risk mitigations identified:
- TSC addition of ISM to publication request should be added to a mitigation strategy for an existing risk or create a strategic risk to represent what it is meant to mitigate.
- US Realm Task Force as mitigation to risk where US Realm does not have authority of an affiliate.
- TSC referred action:
- WG Balloting metric: bundling together other PBS metrics measures including balloting in previous cycles, submitting PSS on time and NIBs on time, etc using Ballot quality assessment consideration as a governance point/work group health metric/strategic initiatives dashboard metric. Would measurements from before and after the changed process to disallow a single check box to enroll in all of the ballots be meaningful? Discussion deferred from TSC agenda 6/9.
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
Adjourned
Next Steps
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
| |||
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
© 2014 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved