Difference between revisions of "2010-08-02 TSC Call Agenda"

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 137: Line 137:
 
#**Discussion: Pharmacy was not contacted prior to Steering Division approval for cosponsorship.  EHR will follow up with Pharmacy on their conference call today. Defer one week. Motion Tabled.
 
#**Discussion: Pharmacy was not contacted prior to Steering Division approval for cosponsorship.  EHR will follow up with Pharmacy on their conference call today. Defer one week. Motion Tabled.
 
#*Announcement of updated Mission and Charter statements for [http://www.hl7.org/Special/committees/visual/overview.cfm CCOW] and [http://www.hl7.org/Special/committees/structure/overview.cfm Structured Documents]. Informative item noted.
 
#*Announcement of updated Mission and Charter statements for [http://www.hl7.org/Special/committees/visual/overview.cfm CCOW] and [http://www.hl7.org/Special/committees/structure/overview.cfm Structured Documents]. Informative item noted.
−
#*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/1607/7408/TSC_ApprovalList_Sept2010.doc List of TSC approvals needed] for September Ballot cycle at [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=1607&start=0 TSC Tracker # 1607]
+
#[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/1607/7408/TSC_ApprovalList_Sept2010.doc List of TSC approvals needed] for September Ballot cycle at [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=1607&start=0 TSC Tracker # 1607]
−
#Approve Minutes of [[2010-07-26_TSC_Call_Agenda]]
+
#*Excluding EHR-Rx projects.
 +
#*Noted that EMS DAM R2 is actually U.S. Realm though the TSC approved it as Universal last week.
 +
#*Informative items unanimously approved with exclusion.
 +
#*DSTU items unanimously approved
 +
#*Normative item, direct to normative, unanimously approved
 +
#*Alternate ballot open dates: CDA IGs do not impact the web publishing schedule due to their format as PDF IG; unanimously approved.
 +
#*Informative items for informative/normative continuing ballots noted.
 +
#Resume regular agenda order
 +
#Approve Minutes of [[2010-07-26_TSC_Call_Agenda]] - unanimously approved.
 
#Review [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemBrowse&tracker_id=494 action items] –
 
#Review [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemBrowse&tracker_id=494 action items] –
 
#*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=1602&start=0 #1602] - Ken: Review draft description of TSC nomination committee composition
 
#*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=1602&start=0 #1602] - Ken: Review draft description of TSC nomination committee composition
 +
#**2 solutions discussed: TSC membership committee vs. HL7 Board nominations committee.  Austin notes we could discuss in Cambridge; Ken will document the options for the WGM.
 
#*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=1574 1574] Develop Quality Plan project scope statement, see also TSC 3-yr plan project at Project Insight #[http://www.hl7.org/special/Committees/projman/searchableProjectIndex.cfm?action=edit&ProjectNumber=647 647], TSC Tracker # [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=1611 1611] - [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/1611/7415/HL7PSS-ProductQualityPlan-20100726.doc Draft Product Quality Scope Statement] - Austin Kreisler
 
#*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=1574 1574] Develop Quality Plan project scope statement, see also TSC 3-yr plan project at Project Insight #[http://www.hl7.org/special/Committees/projman/searchableProjectIndex.cfm?action=edit&ProjectNumber=647 647], TSC Tracker # [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=1611 1611] - [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/1611/7415/HL7PSS-ProductQualityPlan-20100726.doc Draft Product Quality Scope Statement] - Austin Kreisler
 
#**'''Motion:''' Approve HL7 Quality Plan project
 
#**'''Motion:''' Approve HL7 Quality Plan project
−
#*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=1582 #1582] - Ed: Draft Project Scope Statement for TSC Innovations Project
+
#**Discussion: Austin notes there was no feedback.
−
#*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=1581 #1581] - Woody: Draft Project Scope Statement for TSC T3F Strategic Initiative Review project
+
#**'''Vote:''' Unanimously approved. Austin to organize a team to include Ed, Ravi, Ken, John Quinn, invite Dave Hamill, Freida Hall, Rick Haddorff.
−
#*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=1580 #1580] - Ken and John: Draft Project Scope Statement for U.S. Healthcare Readiness Plan
+
#*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=1582 #1582] - Ed: Draft Project Scope Statement for TSC Innovations Project - Ed should have something in a couple of weeks.
−
#*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=1579 #1579] - Ken: Draft Project Scope Statement
+
#*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=1581 #1581] - Woody: Draft Project Scope Statement for TSC T3F Strategic Initiative Review project; Woody not on the call.
−
#*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=1581 #1576] - Lynn: Work with Project Services to draft Project Communications Plan
+
#*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=1580 #1580] - Ken and John: Draft Project Scope Statement for U.S. Healthcare Readiness Plan; on hold until John talks to ONC; Charlie will follow up with John.
−
#*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=1573 #1573] - John Quinn: Identify actions needed to be taken by the TSC based on Roadmap subcommittee recommendations.
+
#*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=1579 #1579] - Ken: Draft Project Scope Statement; on hold
 +
#*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=1581 #1576] - Lynn: Work with Project Services to draft Project Communications Plan; waiting for feedback from Gerald Beuchelt
 +
#*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=1573 #1573] - John Quinn: Identify actions needed to be taken by the TSC based on Roadmap subcommittee recommendations. Table to next week.
 
#*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=1573 #1573] - From 2010-05-03: John and Charlie Mead will work on a one sheet overview of SAIF vs NIEM, reviewed by ArB with the HL7 position.
 
#*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=1573 #1573] - From 2010-05-03: John and Charlie Mead will work on a one sheet overview of SAIF vs NIEM, reviewed by ArB with the HL7 position.
 +
#**Charlie will talk to John
 
#*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=1539 #1539] - Ron to pull the elevator pitch out for TSC review.
 
#*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=1539 #1539] - Ron to pull the elevator pitch out for TSC review.
−
# HL7 Chair or CEO Report – if available
+
#**Charlie will send the one from May to Lynn
−
# CTO Report  -  John Quinn
+
# HL7 Chair or CEO Report – Bob noted that the Roadmap committee wished to solicit TSC input for strategic criteria, and develop the strategic initiative "dashboard".  The document has not been distributed to the TSC following the Roadmap Committee discussion; Bob will send to TSCAdmins listserv.  Bob also reports that in addition to developing TSC alignment with the Board, they continue interest in TSC engagement in WGM planning through the WGM Organizing Committee.
−
# ArB Report – Charlie Mead/Ron Parker
+
# CTO Report  -  John Quinn no available
−
# Affiliates Report – Ravi Natarajan/ Charlie McCay
+
# ArB Report – Charlie Mead
−
# Domain Experts Report– Austin Kreisler/Ed Tripp
+
#*While the ArB didn't meet last week, they have a meeting scheduled with Implementation and Conformance next Tuesday on a handoff of the ECCF.
−
# Foundation & Technology Report– Woody Beeler/Mead Walker
+
#*Charlie announces that the NCI will publish an 'official minus 1' version of their ECCF IG today.
 +
#*Ravi asks about the SAIF alpha projects.  PASS is balloting this cycle and has promised to cull out lessons learned.  Others are demonstrating awareness of SAIF concepts but not structured for formal feedbacl loops.  Ravi reminds the TSC that the International Affiliates will ask at the Cambridge WGM about what is the plan, next steps, rollout, impact points for SAIF. Noted that the TSC should spend time on Saturday at the WGM to discuss, as was learned at the Rio Wednesday session there appears to be a more pervasive uptake to SAIF as compared to driving the self-registration process with alpha projects.  There is a need for more detail from CDA R3 (Structured Documents) project and ITS. We need resource dedicated to rollout.  Charlie Mead notes there is more progress oustide HL7 rather than inside.
 +
#**Calvin says they have been going through enhancement proposals and requirements so far in CDA R3 development and now may be ready to start the workplan and engage with the ArB.
 +
#*Charlie Mead notes that governance is more present otuside of HL7. Formal governance at NCI was defined as part of implementation, with a RACI (RASCI) chart for each cell of the ECCF facilitating its development.  Top down efforts help witht he change management.  Charlie McCay says resources are needed to do governance across all HL7 committees.  Ravi asks for something to show the affiliates in Cambridge.  Ed asks if the RASCI chart shows emerging structures new to the organization? NCI can impose constraints to scope the ECCF IG to Enterprise Services.  They mostly cut and pasted from Thomas Earl's governance and Open Group work together. Ed asks if there are collective responsibilities shown in the NCI chart that map to the TSC, or new entities identified?  Policy governance versus artifact governance needs to be specified.  Perhaps HL7 should not continue to wait for the Governance Framework but go straight to an Implementation Guide for Governance in HL7?  Austin is in favor of this approach.  It would be a combination ArB and TSC responsibility to develop, separate from Business Governance.  Charlie Mead, Austin, Calvin, and Ed volunteer to work on it, and recommend Charlie ask Freida to join the effort. 
 +
#**'''Action item:''' Charlie Mead to send the NCI rough plan and references they used to the group.
 +
# Foundation & Technology Report– Mead Walker
 
#*'''Tabled Motion:''' Approve [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/1600/7382/HL7ProjectScopeStatement_Neutral_Mapping_May2010_R3_clean.doc Neutral Mapping Notation] by ITS WG, see [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=1600&start=0 TSC Tracker # 1600], [http://www.hl7.org/special/Committees/projman/searchableProjectIndex.cfm?action=edit&ProjectNumber=680 Project Insight # 680].
 
#*'''Tabled Motion:''' Approve [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/1600/7382/HL7ProjectScopeStatement_Neutral_Mapping_May2010_R3_clean.doc Neutral Mapping Notation] by ITS WG, see [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=1600&start=0 TSC Tracker # 1600], [http://www.hl7.org/special/Committees/projman/searchableProjectIndex.cfm?action=edit&ProjectNumber=680 Project Insight # 680].
−
 
+
#**Carry forward Neutral Mapping as there are revisions to the scope statement that have not yet been completed.
−
 
+
#Remainder of agenda carried forward to next week.
 
#Adjourned 12:01 EDT
 
#Adjourned 12:01 EDT
−
-->
 
  
 
===Next Steps===
 
===Next Steps===

Latest revision as of 17:26, 2 August 2010

TSC Agenda/Minutes

Meeting Info/Attendees

HL7 TSC Meeting Minutes

Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 124466#
GoToMeeting ID: 165-215-206

Date: 2010-08-02
Time: 11:00 AM U.S. Eastern
Facilitator Charlie McCay Note taker(s) Lynn Laakso
Attendee Name Affiliation
x Calvin Beebe HL7 SSD SD Co-Chair
Woody Beeler HL7 FTSD Co-Chair
x Bob Dolin HL7 Board Chair
x Austin Kreisler HL7 DESD Co-Chair
x Lynn Laakso HL7 staff support
x Ken McCaslin HL7 TSS SD Co-Chair
x Charlie McCay (chair) HL7 TSC Chair, Affiliate Representative
x Charlie Mead HL7 ArB Chair
x Ravi Natarajan HL7 Affiliate Representative
Ron Parker HL7 ArB Alternate
regrets John Quinn HL7 CTO
x Gregg Seppala HL7 SSD SD Co-Chair
Helen Stevens HL7 TSS SD Co-Chair
x Ed Tripp HL7 DESD Co-Chair
x D. Mead Walker HL7 FTSD Co-Chair


Quorum Requirements (Chair +5 with 2 SD Reps) Met: yes

Agenda

Agenda Topics

  1. Introduction of visitors (including declaration of interests)
  2. Agenda review and approval - Charlie McCay
  3. Approve Minutes of 2010-07-26_TSC_Call_Agenda
  4. Review action items –
    • #1602 - Ken: Review draft description of TSC nomination committee composition
    • 1574 Develop Quality Plan project scope statement, see also TSC 3-yr plan project at Project Insight #647, TSC Tracker # 1611 - Draft Product Quality Scope Statement - Austin Kreisler
      • Motion: Approve HL7 Quality Plan project
    • #1582 - Ed: Draft Project Scope Statement for TSC Innovations Project
    • #1581 - Woody: Draft Project Scope Statement for TSC T3F Strategic Initiative Review project
    • #1580 - Ken and John: Draft Project Scope Statement for U.S. Healthcare Readiness Plan
    • #1579 - Ken: Draft Project Scope Statement
    • #1576 - Lynn: Work with Project Services to draft Project Communications Plan
    • #1573 - John Quinn: Identify actions needed to be taken by the TSC based on Roadmap subcommittee recommendations.
    • #1573 - From 2010-05-03: John and Charlie Mead will work on a one sheet overview of SAIF vs NIEM, reviewed by ArB with the HL7 position.
    • #1539 - Ron to pull the elevator pitch out for TSC review.
  5. HL7 Chair or CEO Report – if available
  6. CTO Report - John Quinn
  7. ArB Report – Charlie Mead/Ron Parker
  8. Affiliates Report – Ravi Natarajan/ Charlie McCay
  9. Domain Experts Report– Austin Kreisler/Ed Tripp
  10. Foundation & Technology Report– Woody Beeler/Mead Walker
  11. Structure & Semantic Design Report– Calvin Beebe/Gregg Seppala
  12. Technical & Support Services Report- Ken McCaslin/ Helen Stevens
  13. Membership Comments on Steering Division Reports
  14. WGM Planning -
    • Marketing and promotion - update from HQ -
    • TSC preparations - Lynn Laakso
    • Working Group preparations - agendas
  15. Organizational Relations Committee update (semiweekly) - Helen Stevens
  16. Discussion Topics:


Supporting Documents


Minutes

Minutes/Conclusions Reached:

  1. Visitors/Quorum reviewed: quorum met
  2. Agenda Review: move SSD SD first then ballot item reviews then regular agenda. Agenda accepted by general consent.
  3. Structure & Semantic Design Report– Calvin Beebe
  4. List of TSC approvals needed for September Ballot cycle at TSC Tracker # 1607
    • Excluding EHR-Rx projects.
    • Noted that EMS DAM R2 is actually U.S. Realm though the TSC approved it as Universal last week.
    • Informative items unanimously approved with exclusion.
    • DSTU items unanimously approved
    • Normative item, direct to normative, unanimously approved
    • Alternate ballot open dates: CDA IGs do not impact the web publishing schedule due to their format as PDF IG; unanimously approved.
    • Informative items for informative/normative continuing ballots noted.
  5. Resume regular agenda order
  6. Approve Minutes of 2010-07-26_TSC_Call_Agenda - unanimously approved.
  7. Review action items –
    • #1602 - Ken: Review draft description of TSC nomination committee composition
      • 2 solutions discussed: TSC membership committee vs. HL7 Board nominations committee. Austin notes we could discuss in Cambridge; Ken will document the options for the WGM.
    • 1574 Develop Quality Plan project scope statement, see also TSC 3-yr plan project at Project Insight #647, TSC Tracker # 1611 - Draft Product Quality Scope Statement - Austin Kreisler
      • Motion: Approve HL7 Quality Plan project
      • Discussion: Austin notes there was no feedback.
      • Vote: Unanimously approved. Austin to organize a team to include Ed, Ravi, Ken, John Quinn, invite Dave Hamill, Freida Hall, Rick Haddorff.
    • #1582 - Ed: Draft Project Scope Statement for TSC Innovations Project - Ed should have something in a couple of weeks.
    • #1581 - Woody: Draft Project Scope Statement for TSC T3F Strategic Initiative Review project; Woody not on the call.
    • #1580 - Ken and John: Draft Project Scope Statement for U.S. Healthcare Readiness Plan; on hold until John talks to ONC; Charlie will follow up with John.
    • #1579 - Ken: Draft Project Scope Statement; on hold
    • #1576 - Lynn: Work with Project Services to draft Project Communications Plan; waiting for feedback from Gerald Beuchelt
    • #1573 - John Quinn: Identify actions needed to be taken by the TSC based on Roadmap subcommittee recommendations. Table to next week.
    • #1573 - From 2010-05-03: John and Charlie Mead will work on a one sheet overview of SAIF vs NIEM, reviewed by ArB with the HL7 position.
      • Charlie will talk to John
    • #1539 - Ron to pull the elevator pitch out for TSC review.
      • Charlie will send the one from May to Lynn
  8. HL7 Chair or CEO Report – Bob noted that the Roadmap committee wished to solicit TSC input for strategic criteria, and develop the strategic initiative "dashboard". The document has not been distributed to the TSC following the Roadmap Committee discussion; Bob will send to TSCAdmins listserv. Bob also reports that in addition to developing TSC alignment with the Board, they continue interest in TSC engagement in WGM planning through the WGM Organizing Committee.
  9. CTO Report - John Quinn no available
  10. ArB Report – Charlie Mead
    • While the ArB didn't meet last week, they have a meeting scheduled with Implementation and Conformance next Tuesday on a handoff of the ECCF.
    • Charlie announces that the NCI will publish an 'official minus 1' version of their ECCF IG today.
    • Ravi asks about the SAIF alpha projects. PASS is balloting this cycle and has promised to cull out lessons learned. Others are demonstrating awareness of SAIF concepts but not structured for formal feedbacl loops. Ravi reminds the TSC that the International Affiliates will ask at the Cambridge WGM about what is the plan, next steps, rollout, impact points for SAIF. Noted that the TSC should spend time on Saturday at the WGM to discuss, as was learned at the Rio Wednesday session there appears to be a more pervasive uptake to SAIF as compared to driving the self-registration process with alpha projects. There is a need for more detail from CDA R3 (Structured Documents) project and ITS. We need resource dedicated to rollout. Charlie Mead notes there is more progress oustide HL7 rather than inside.
      • Calvin says they have been going through enhancement proposals and requirements so far in CDA R3 development and now may be ready to start the workplan and engage with the ArB.
    • Charlie Mead notes that governance is more present otuside of HL7. Formal governance at NCI was defined as part of implementation, with a RACI (RASCI) chart for each cell of the ECCF facilitating its development. Top down efforts help witht he change management. Charlie McCay says resources are needed to do governance across all HL7 committees. Ravi asks for something to show the affiliates in Cambridge. Ed asks if the RASCI chart shows emerging structures new to the organization? NCI can impose constraints to scope the ECCF IG to Enterprise Services. They mostly cut and pasted from Thomas Earl's governance and Open Group work together. Ed asks if there are collective responsibilities shown in the NCI chart that map to the TSC, or new entities identified? Policy governance versus artifact governance needs to be specified. Perhaps HL7 should not continue to wait for the Governance Framework but go straight to an Implementation Guide for Governance in HL7? Austin is in favor of this approach. It would be a combination ArB and TSC responsibility to develop, separate from Business Governance. Charlie Mead, Austin, Calvin, and Ed volunteer to work on it, and recommend Charlie ask Freida to join the effort.
      • Action item: Charlie Mead to send the NCI rough plan and references they used to the group.
  11. Foundation & Technology Report– Mead Walker
  12. Remainder of agenda carried forward to next week.
  13. Adjourned 12:01 EDT

Next Steps

Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
  • .
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
  • .
Retrieved from "https://tscwiki.hl7.org/w/index.php?title=2010-08-02_TSC_Call_Agenda&oldid=6780"