Difference between revisions of "TSC Agenda item list"

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
 
(20 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
* Motion to approve change to JAVA Work Group (scheduled for June 9)
+
*By what mechanism/how does HL7 produce white papers? (from 20090922 Tuesday lunch discussion)
−
* Proposal from Beebe on acceptable start date for Work Groups not using the Pubs DB (June 9)
+
 
−
* Proposal from McCaslin on co-chair elections for TSC appointed committees (scheduled for June 16)
+
*Tooling - what change the working group will see and when, and what does the TSC need to do (See [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=323&group_id=52&atid=313 TSC Tracker # 323] and [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=588&group_id=52&atid=313TSC Tracker # 588])
−
* Meyer to updated GOM sections related to dissolution of Work Group and nomination/election of affiliate representatives to the TSC (schedule for June 9)
+
 
−
* Discuss TSC's role in approving MOUs (not currently scheduled but suggested by Hammond)
+
*Formalization in DMPs of method and process used for e-voting.
−
* Clean up of project list to be completed by Board retreat
+
* Questions for the Advisory Committee (AC) - prior to their conference calls.  Examples:
 +
**It would be useful to get a better idea of what the Advisory Council picture when they ready the roadmap strategies, and so I would like to hear one or more examples of SMART objectives for each of the strategies, or other quantifiable measures that they they would recommend as indicators that we are delivering successfully against each of the strategies. <br/>It may be that this is something that the roadmap taskforce should be doing -- but I think that this would be a good way to obtain a better understanding of what those outside HL7 would see as successful delivery
 +
**What information about HL7 projects, products and workgroups do they need to be able to more effectively generate unsolicited advice to HL7? Are there examples of how other organisations work with advisory councils, and the sort of information that is available and reviewed?
 +
**For each of the questions that HL7 asks the advisory council, what briefing information would it be useful to have about projects, products and workgroups? 
 +
**Once the advisory council is working on a question, how can HL7 ensure that they have the relevant information about HL7 projects, products and workgroups?
 +
**How do we better ensure that we are collecting and publishing information about projects, products and workgroups that is useful and used by the Advisory council and others, and how do we get feedback to those providing the information?
 +
*What categories or hierarchy does the TSC wish to see in the product list?  Need guidance for updates to the Project Scope Statement and display on the website  [[User:Llaakso|LynnL]] 16:34, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 +
*FUTURE AGENDA ITEM: Look at a revision at an upcoming conference call of the CTO side, not necessarily the TSC side (2010MayWGM) from [[2010-05-15_TSC_WGM_Agenda]]

Latest revision as of 15:09, 25 May 2010

  • By what mechanism/how does HL7 produce white papers? (from 20090922 Tuesday lunch discussion)
  • Formalization in DMPs of method and process used for e-voting.
  • Questions for the Advisory Committee (AC) - prior to their conference calls. Examples:
    • It would be useful to get a better idea of what the Advisory Council picture when they ready the roadmap strategies, and so I would like to hear one or more examples of SMART objectives for each of the strategies, or other quantifiable measures that they they would recommend as indicators that we are delivering successfully against each of the strategies.
      It may be that this is something that the roadmap taskforce should be doing -- but I think that this would be a good way to obtain a better understanding of what those outside HL7 would see as successful delivery
    • What information about HL7 projects, products and workgroups do they need to be able to more effectively generate unsolicited advice to HL7? Are there examples of how other organisations work with advisory councils, and the sort of information that is available and reviewed?
    • For each of the questions that HL7 asks the advisory council, what briefing information would it be useful to have about projects, products and workgroups?
    • Once the advisory council is working on a question, how can HL7 ensure that they have the relevant information about HL7 projects, products and workgroups?
    • How do we better ensure that we are collecting and publishing information about projects, products and workgroups that is useful and used by the Advisory council and others, and how do we get feedback to those providing the information?
  • What categories or hierarchy does the TSC wish to see in the product list? Need guidance for updates to the Project Scope Statement and display on the website LynnL 16:34, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
  • FUTURE AGENDA ITEM: Look at a revision at an upcoming conference call of the CTO side, not necessarily the TSC side (2010MayWGM) from 2010-05-15_TSC_WGM_Agenda
Retrieved from "https://tscwiki.hl7.org/w/index.php?title=TSC_Agenda_item_list&oldid=6441"