Difference between revisions of "2015-10-07 PLA WGM Agenda"

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 42: Line 42:
 
| || Woody Beeler  
 
| || Woody Beeler  
 
|-
 
|-
| ||Lorraine Constable
+
|x ||Lorraine Constable
 
|-
 
|-
 
| ||Bo Dagnall
 
| ||Bo Dagnall
Line 54: Line 54:
 
| || Paul Knapp
 
| || Paul Knapp
 
|-
 
|-
| || Austin Kreisler,
+
|x || Austin Kreisler,
 
|-
 
|-
 
| || Lynn Laakso
 
| || Lynn Laakso
 
|-
 
|-
| || Mary Kay McDaniel
+
|x || Mary Kay McDaniel
 
|-
 
|-
| || Brian Pech
+
|x || Brian Pech
 
|-
 
|-
 
| || John Quinn
 
| || John Quinn
Line 84: Line 84:
 
========================================================--->
 
========================================================--->
 
===Agenda===
 
===Agenda===
Agenda review
+
*Agenda review
 +
*Notes of [[20150916_PLA_call]] review
 
*Discussion Topics:
 
*Discussion Topics:
 
**Summary of discussions this week with FGB regarding FGB/SGB roles
 
**Summary of discussions this week with FGB regarding FGB/SGB roles
Line 91: Line 92:
 
***Identify current groups handling methodology and determine if they are willing to take on role
 
***Identify current groups handling methodology and determine if they are willing to take on role
  
*Notes of [[2015MMDD_PLA_call]] review
 
 
*notional division of products into product families and lines, to provide examples for peer review.
 
*notional division of products into product families and lines, to provide examples for peer review.
 
**Level of granularity
 
**Level of granularity
Line 101: Line 101:
  
 
===Minutes===
 
===Minutes===
Convened
+
*Convened at 3:30 pm Eastern
 
+
*Discussion over whether the PLA now works to establish product family management groups, or if the SGB will do that.
Adjourned
+
**General consensus that the PLA should not dissolve at this point and should be the group to continue forward with establishing the product family management groups
 +
*TSC meeting: Paul updated TSC on project and stated that the next tasks would be to establish the product family management group.
 +
*MOTION that PLA’s position as a TSC project makes our mission to establish the HL7 business architecture as defined in the HL7 BAM specification; the SGB is one of the first steps but there are additional steps to complete before the PLA dissolves such as establishing product family management groups. Second by Lorraine.
 +
*VOTE: all in favor
 +
*Minutes from 9/16 accepted by general consent
 +
*Mary Kay reviewed/edited slides to be presented to publishing
 +
*Share Methodology space for V2: InM, CGIT and Vocab
 +
*Need to set up a meeting with 2.x editors and InM, CGIT, TSC, Lynn, and Publishing co-chairs, SGB, Vocab co-chairs: Schedule for October 21st
 +
*CDA: Governance – Structured Docs. Management – Structured Docs  Methodology – MnM, Vocabulary, and Templates
 +
*How will naming this management group work? Will the groups retain their names? Publishing the V2 management group, or do we set up separate a product portfolio management group?
  
 
===Meeting Outcomes===
 
===Meeting Outcomes===

Latest revision as of 15:46, 21 October 2015

return to HL7 Product Line Architecture Meeting Minutes and Agendas
Return to HL7 Product Line Architecture Program

HL7 PLA Call Minutes

Location: Conference Room 127

Date: 2015-10-07
Time: 3:30 PM Eastern
Facilitator Mary Kay/ Austin Note taker(s) Anne
Attendee Name


Calvin Beebe
Woody Beeler
x Lorraine Constable
Bo Dagnall
Regrets Jean Duteau,
Rick Haddorff
Tony Julian
Paul Knapp
x Austin Kreisler,
Lynn Laakso
x Mary Kay McDaniel
x Brian Pech
John Quinn
John Roberts
Regrets Andy Stechishin
no quorum definition

Agenda

  • Agenda review
  • Notes of 20150916_PLA_call review
  • Discussion Topics:
    • Summary of discussions this week with FGB regarding FGB/SGB roles
    • Update on PLA/SGB presentation to TSC on Saturday
    • Next focus: Product management groups
      • Identify current groups handling methodology and determine if they are willing to take on role
  • notional division of products into product families and lines, to provide examples for peer review.
    • Level of granularity
    • Identify which pieces are orphaned, and the political elements to be surfaced.
    • Positioning cross-product family artifacts (standards naming)
  • BAM-lite feedback and review
    • Governance on V2.x (v2.9 substantive changes)
    • develop form to request establishing a Product Family

Minutes

  • Convened at 3:30 pm Eastern
  • Discussion over whether the PLA now works to establish product family management groups, or if the SGB will do that.
    • General consensus that the PLA should not dissolve at this point and should be the group to continue forward with establishing the product family management groups
  • TSC meeting: Paul updated TSC on project and stated that the next tasks would be to establish the product family management group.
  • MOTION that PLA’s position as a TSC project makes our mission to establish the HL7 business architecture as defined in the HL7 BAM specification; the SGB is one of the first steps but there are additional steps to complete before the PLA dissolves such as establishing product family management groups. Second by Lorraine.
  • VOTE: all in favor
  • Minutes from 9/16 accepted by general consent
  • Mary Kay reviewed/edited slides to be presented to publishing
  • Share Methodology space for V2: InM, CGIT and Vocab
  • Need to set up a meeting with 2.x editors and InM, CGIT, TSC, Lynn, and Publishing co-chairs, SGB, Vocab co-chairs: Schedule for October 21st
  • CDA: Governance – Structured Docs. Management – Structured Docs Methodology – MnM, Vocabulary, and Templates
  • How will naming this management group work? Will the groups retain their names? Publishing the V2 management group, or do we set up separate a product portfolio management group?

Meeting Outcomes

Actions
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items

© 2014 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved