Difference between revisions of "FTSD-ConCall-20141202"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Paul knapp (talk | contribs) |
Paul knapp (talk | contribs) (→Agenda) |
||
| Line 107: | Line 107: | ||
==Agenda== | ==Agenda== | ||
#''(05 min)'' Roll Call | #''(05 min)'' Roll Call | ||
| − | #''( | + | #''(20 min)'' FHIR WG Discussion |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
#''(5 min)'' '''Other Business''' | #''(5 min)'' '''Other Business''' | ||
===[[FTSD Agenda item list|Agenda items]]=== | ===[[FTSD Agenda item list|Agenda items]]=== | ||
| + | FHIR WG Proposal, Mission and Charter Discussion: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ARB Request: It would be very useful if they positioned their work relative to SAIF, in particular defining their conceptual, logical, and implementable relationships. I would presume that FHIR WG would be deterministic on implementable model decisions that are FHIR centric while the language and relationships around logical and conceptual perspectives would be more conciliatory. | ||
| + | |||
| + | We are awaiting further developments of the Mission and Charter as per the ARB request. We have concerns regarding the scope described in the document and the overlap of that scope with existing work groups, and the location of responsibility of decisions. | ||
===[[FTSD Action item list|Action Item List]]=== | ===[[FTSD Action item list|Action Item List]]=== | ||
[[Foundation_%26_Technology_Meeting_Minutes_and_Agendas|Back to Meetings]] | [[Foundation_%26_Technology_Meeting_Minutes_and_Agendas|Back to Meetings]] | ||
Latest revision as of 21:21, 11 January 2015
Fndn&Tech Steering Divn - Conference Call (date above)
Meeting Information
- Conference Call is scheduled for 0.5 hour,
- Tuesday 12:00 PM to be repeated every other week
- Please consult http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock for your local times
- HL7 Conference Call Service
- Phone Number: +1 770-657-9270 (Passcode: 943627)
- Online Meeting Service - GoToMeeting
- https://www2.gotomeeting.com/join/385800034 (GoToMeeting ID: 385-800-034)
Steering Division Members:
- Application Integration & Design (AID)
- Implementable Technology Specifications (ITS)
- Conformance & Guidance for Implementation/Testing(CGIT)
- Infrastructure & Messaging (InM)
- Modeling & Methodology (MnM)
- Security
- Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)
- Templates
- Vocabulary
Attendees
| Facilitator | Note taker | Quorum = 5 WGs | |||
| Paul | Paul | Yes | |||
| Implementable Technology Specifications (ITS) | Conformance & Guidance for Implementation/Testing | Infrastructure and Messaging (InM) | |||
| X | Knapp, Paul | . | Huang, Wendy | X | Julian, Tony |
| . | Nelson, Dale | . | Oemig, Frank | . | Shaver, Dave |
| . | Stechishin, Andy | . | Singureanu, Ioana | . | Stuart, Sandy |
| . | Snelick, Robert | . | |||
| Modeling & Methodology (MnM) | Application Integration and Design (AID) | Security | |||
| . | Beeler, Woody | . | Hendler MD, Peter | . | Blobel PhD, Bernd |
| . | Duteau, Jean | X | Stechishin, Andy | . | Davis, Mike |
| . | Grieve, Grahame | . | Spronk, Rene | X | Moehrke, John |
| . | McKenzie, Lloyd | Williams, Patricia | |||
| . | Shakir, AbdulMalik | ||||
| Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) | Templates | Vocabulary | |||
| . | Jorgenson, Don | . | Heitmann, Kai | . | Case, James |
| . | Lotti,Stefano | . | Roberts , John | . | Grain, Heather |
| . | Rubin, Ken | . | Shafarman, Mark | . | Hamm, Russell |
| . | McCauley, Vince | X | Hausam, Rob | ||
| . | Klein, William Ted | ||||
| . | |||||
| Guests | |||||
| X | Hamill, Dave | ||||
| . | . = Absent, X = Present, r = Regrets | ||||
Agenda
- (05 min) Roll Call
- (20 min) FHIR WG Discussion
- (5 min) Other Business
Agenda items
FHIR WG Proposal, Mission and Charter Discussion:
ARB Request: It would be very useful if they positioned their work relative to SAIF, in particular defining their conceptual, logical, and implementable relationships. I would presume that FHIR WG would be deterministic on implementable model decisions that are FHIR centric while the language and relationships around logical and conceptual perspectives would be more conciliatory.
We are awaiting further developments of the Mission and Charter as per the ARB request. We have concerns regarding the scope described in the document and the overlap of that scope with existing work groups, and the location of responsibility of decisions.
