Difference between revisions of "2014-12-17 TRAC"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Anne wizauer (talk | contribs) |
Anne wizauer (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
==TSC Risk Assessment Committee (TRAC) Agenda/Minutes == | ==TSC Risk Assessment Committee (TRAC) Agenda/Minutes == | ||
| Line 91: | Line 59: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|colspan="4" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/> | |colspan="4" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/> | ||
| − | *[[2015-01- | + | *[[2015-01-07 TRAC]]. |
|} | |} | ||
© 2014 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved | © 2014 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved | ||
Latest revision as of 14:51, 14 January 2015
TSC Risk Assessment Committee (TRAC) Agenda/Minutes
back to TRAC page
Meeting Info/Attendees
| TRAC Meeting Minutes Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371# |
Date: Wednesday, 2014-12-17 Time: 10:00 AM U.S. Eastern | |
| Facilitator: Pat Van Dyke | Note taker(s): Anne | |
| Quorum | n/a | ||||
| Chair/CTO | Members | Members | |||
| x | Pat Van Dyke | Regrets | Rick Haddorff | Freida Hall | |
| x | Austin Kreisler | Ken McCaslin | x | Melva Peters | |
| John Quinn | John Roberts | ||||
Agenda
- Agenda review and approval - Pat Van Dyke
- Review minutes of 2014-12-10 TRAC
- Action Items:
- Continue work on document
- Fix Pat's editing permissions
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
- Call started at 10:03
- Reviewed recent activity
- Pat asks if anyone has heard any concerns about WG 3-year plans. Austin replies that the benefit of 3 year planning may not be seen. FHIR, for instance, has changed things so much that the original 3 year plans can't be followed. WGs are losing control of what should be their material by the threat of work being done for them if they can't complete it on the FHIR timeline. Pat asks if Argonaut is outside forces coming in to do the work, and if so will they adhere to the standards? Melva/Austin reply that it is unknown at this point. Should we add to risk spreadsheet? Or is it covered by another item in our spreadsheet? Looks like a combo of 244, 250, 251, 253, and 254. Argonaut is a way for FHIR to mitigate a number of these risks. The risk is they'll do it without coordinating through the WGs. They don't seem to be throwing the resources at the WGs. How do we get around this and avoid the issues? Since it's WG projects doing the resource work for the May ballot, Argonaut resources need to work through the WGs. Has to be completely transparent. What questions need to move forward to TSC, FGB, and FMG? Should we meet with TSC before January 5 regarding these concerns? TSC leadership should open a channel to find out intent and provide guidance. Pat will outreach to Ken with these concerns on behalf of TRAC regarding loss of WG control and oversight - hope to meet on the subject in the next week. If we wait until the WG meeting the process will be too far along to provide input.
Adjourned
Next Steps
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
| |||
| Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
© 2014 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved
