Difference between revisions of "TSC SWOT"

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(15 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
*Strengths
 
*Strengths
 
**Clear focus on delineated governance and management activities
 
**Clear focus on delineated governance and management activities
−
** Respected, highly experienced membership
+
**Respected, committed, highly experienced membership
−
** Committed membership
+
**Open, transparent, and responsive
−
** Support from board, HQ, and Work Group members
 
−
** Open, transparent, and responsive
 
−
**Proactive
 
  
−
*Weakness
+
 
−
** Limited time
+
*Weaknesses
−
** Limited control over resources
+
**Limited influence over resources
−
**Support from Board, HQ, and Working Group but still sometimes we don't get the support we need from the Board and members
+
**Inconsistent interaction and support from Board and Working Groups
−
**Process for bringing in external proposed standards.
+
**Organizational complexity
−
** Linkage with Strategic Initiatives
+
**Insufficient time spent on big picture issues
  
 
*Opportunities
 
*Opportunities
−
**Business Architecture Model development offers improved Governance and Management to match existing Methodology strengths
+
**Become more proactive
−
**Change to Intellectual Property licensing at no cost
+
**Product quality
−
**Clearly designate our product line and product identification
+
**Process Improvement
−
**Emergence of new and contemporary technology including FHIR and semantic web ontologies
+
***New tooling
−
**Leverage new membership benefits for IP management, help desk and conformance testing, in dealing with technical issues.
+
**Respond to new opportunities for increasing membership  
−
**Provide mechanisms to allow vitality assessment throughout the organization; define criteria for trigger events: including ability to define processes for assessment, provide strategic and tactical guidance to the EC and Board.
+
**Increase participation through simplification
 +
**Revising Working Group structure to become more efficient and attract more participants
 +
**Increased cooperation and collaboration with other industry groups
  
 
*Threats
 
*Threats
−
**Creating overheads without visible return
+
**Danger of creating overheads without visible return
−
**Improve Product Quality
+
**Lack of confidence in standards management may cause stakeholders to create their own healthcare standards
−
**Lack of confidence in standards management creates vacuum for Profiler/Enforcer creating their own healthcare interoperability standards
+
**Keeping up with increased uptake of our standards (e.g. FHIR)
−
**Increasing numbers of mandates coming from the US Realm
+
**Lack of adequate governance, management, curation and support processes to manage our standards and the resulting profiles that are created
−
**Lack of clear governance surrounding new member benefits e.g. user groups
+
**Lack of well-defined conformance and profiling methodologies for our standards
 +
**Lack of HL7 Strategic Plan
 +
**Succession planning
 +
**Not enough international participation on TSC
 +
 
 +
 
  
−
Approved by TSC 2014-09-13
+
Approved by TSC 2016-01-14, current edits started 2019-01-12. Threats to be addressed before approval.

Latest revision as of 16:21, 12 January 2019

  • Strengths
    • Clear focus on delineated governance and management activities
    • Respected, committed, highly experienced membership
    • Open, transparent, and responsive


  • Weaknesses
    • Limited influence over resources
    • Inconsistent interaction and support from Board and Working Groups
    • Organizational complexity
    • Insufficient time spent on big picture issues
  • Opportunities
    • Become more proactive
    • Product quality
    • Process Improvement
      • New tooling
    • Respond to new opportunities for increasing membership
    • Increase participation through simplification
    • Revising Working Group structure to become more efficient and attract more participants
    • Increased cooperation and collaboration with other industry groups
  • Threats
    • Danger of creating overheads without visible return
    • Lack of confidence in standards management may cause stakeholders to create their own healthcare standards
    • Keeping up with increased uptake of our standards (e.g. FHIR)
    • Lack of adequate governance, management, curation and support processes to manage our standards and the resulting profiles that are created
    • Lack of well-defined conformance and profiling methodologies for our standards
    • Lack of HL7 Strategic Plan
    • Succession planning
    • Not enough international participation on TSC


Approved by TSC 2016-01-14, current edits started 2019-01-12. Threats to be addressed before approval.

Retrieved from "https://tscwiki.hl7.org/w/index.php?title=TSC_SWOT&oldid=20629"