Difference between revisions of "2012-04-16 TSC Call Minutes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
===Meeting Info/Attendees=== | ===Meeting Info/Attendees=== | ||
− | + | [[Category:2012 TSC Minutes]] | |
− | [[Category:2012 TSC Minutes | ||
{|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" | {|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" | ||
Line 22: | Line 21: | ||
|colspan="2"|Chair/CTO ||colspan="2"|ArB ||colspan="2"|International Affiliate Rep ||colspan="2"|Ad-Hoc | |colspan="2"|Chair/CTO ||colspan="2"|ArB ||colspan="2"|International Affiliate Rep ||colspan="2"|Ad-Hoc | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |x||Austin Kreisler||.||Charlie Mead||x||Ravi Natarajan||1st half||Helen Stevens |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |x||John Quinn ||x||Ron Parker||regrets||Giorgio Cangioli|| |
|- | |- | ||
Line 33: | Line 32: | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |regrets||Ed Tripp||regrets||Woody Beeler|| | + | |regrets||Ed Tripp||regrets||Woody Beeler||x||Calvin Beebe||x||Freida Hall |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |x||Mead Walker||.||Tony Julian||.||Pat van Dyke||x||Patrick Loyd |
|- | |- | ||
|colspan="2" align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|''ex officio'' | |colspan="2" align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|''ex officio'' | ||
Line 42: | Line 41: | ||
|colspan="2" align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|HL7 Staff | |colspan="2" align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|HL7 Staff | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |.||Don Mon (HL7 Chair) w/vote|| | + | |.||Don Mon (HL7 Chair) w/vote||x||Ken McCaslin||.||''obs1''||x||Lynn Laakso |
|- | |- | ||
|.||Bob Dolin (Vice Chair) <s>vote</s>||.||tba||.||''obs2''||.|| | |.||Bob Dolin (Vice Chair) <s>vote</s>||.||tba||.||''obs2''||.|| | ||
Line 82: | Line 81: | ||
===Minutes=== | ===Minutes=== | ||
'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/> | '''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/> | ||
+ | #Introduction of visitors (including declaration of interests) Ken joins the call on the ES projects | ||
+ | #Agenda review and approval - Austin Kreisler approved by general consent | ||
+ | #Approve Minutes of [[2012-04-09 TSC Call Agenda]], Helen, Ravi abstain, approved 4/0/2. | ||
+ | #Review [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemBrowse&tracker_id=494 action items] – | ||
+ | <!-- --> | ||
+ | <!-- Approvals --> | ||
+ | #Approval items: | ||
+ | #*'''Motion: ''' Approve [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/2241/9256/2012PSSBallotEducationProject.doc Project Scope Statement] for Electronic Services WG of T3SD for ''Develop HL7 Ballot Site Education Tutorial'', at [http://www.hl7.org/special/Committees/projman/searchableProjectIndex.cfm?action=edit&ProjectNumber=877 Project Insight #877], [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=2241&start=0 TSC Tracker # 2241]. | ||
+ | #**Going to meet Thursday Q2 at WGM, hope to have final tutorial by January 2013. Tutorial would not be offered at WGM as participants are probably involved in WG meetings so targeted for a web-based tutorial. | ||
+ | #**'''Vote: '''unanimously approved. Ken leaves the call. | ||
+ | #*'''Motion: '''Approve [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/2242/9257/EducationWG-ElectronicCertificationTesting.doc Project Scope Statement] for Education WG of T3SD for ''Electronic Certification Testing'', at [http://www.hl7.org/special/Committees/projman/searchableProjectIndex.cfm?action=edit&ProjectNumber=882 Project Insight #882], [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=2242&start=0 TSC Tracker # 2242]. | ||
+ | #**Patrick joins the call, and discusses this project. Another project would likely be the outcome of this project. | ||
+ | #**'''Vote: ''' unanimously approved. | ||
+ | #*'''Motion: ''' Approve [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/2243/9260/RequestforOut_of_CycleBallot2012_04_09.doc Out of Cycle Ballot request] for CIC WG of DESD, cosponsored by RCRIM, for ''HL7 Version 3 Domain Analysis Model: Schizophrenia, Release 1'', at [http://www.hl7.org/special/Committees/projman/searchableProjectIndex.cfm?action=edit&ProjectNumber=840 Project Insight # 840] and [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=2243 TSC Tracker 2243]. | ||
+ | #**Neither Ed nor Mead available to describe. | ||
+ | #**'''Vote: ''' unanimously approved. | ||
+ | #*Approve [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/2228/9261/ANSI_proposal_withdrawal_LifeCycleModelDSTU.doc withdrawal request] for EHR WG of SSD SD for ''Electronic Health Record System Lifecycle Model'', at [http://www.hl7.org/special/Committees/projman/searchableProjectIndex.cfm?action=edit&ProjectNumber=201 Project Insight # 201], [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=2228&start=0 TSC Tracker # 2228]. | ||
+ | #**Helen comments that this and the following work have been merged with the EHR-S FM R2 and are not needed in their past DSTU form. | ||
+ | #**'''Vote:''' unanimously approved. | ||
+ | #*Approve [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/2244/9262/ANSI_proposal_withdrawal_EHR_IM_DSTU.doc withdrawal request] for EHR WG of SSD SD for ''Electronic Health Record Interoperability Model'', at [http://www.hl7.org/special/Committees/projman/searchableProjectIndex.cfm?action=edit&ProjectNumber=261 Project Insight # 261], [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=2244&start=0 TSC Tracker # 2244]. | ||
+ | #**'''Vote:''' unanimously approved. | ||
+ | <!-- --> | ||
+ | <!-- Discussion --> | ||
+ | #Discussion topics: | ||
+ | #*Mead joins the call. | ||
+ | #*International perspective on Activities with Other SDOs (Austin) - Austin notes with Helen's pending departure at the bottom of the hour he wishes to move this up. Topic this time is actual implementers' experience in moving a project through multiple SDOs. Would like to hear from at least one affiliate-based project to participate on the panel. Ravi notes that NHS would probably have some experience and he will check around. Last time was leaders of the SDOs themselves on the panel. Ravi notes that he will ask Nicholas Oughtibridge to participate if he's able to attend the WGM. Panel meeting is Sunday Q4, with the next concall this Thursday 4/19 at 1 pm. Ravi will email the International Council list to invite participation as well. Mead suggests they ask the question which affiliate projects involved participation among SDOs. John notes that by the time of the Vancouver meeting the US will be building an organization to do that between the ISO US TAG and the SCO. Canadian Standards Collaborative is similar - Helen will discuss with Melva. ACTION ITEM: Lynn will forward the concall meeting invitation to the TSC admins list. | ||
+ | #*Proposed Domain Analysis Model [http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=Domain_Analysis_Model_ArB Definition from ArB] | ||
+ | #**Patrick notes they had a three hour meeting that only took 2 hrs. Ron made some subtle additions he just updated on the wiki. Austin wishes the TSC members to review it briefly and thinks it warrants further discussion in Vancouver. | ||
+ | #**Ron discusses some of the assumptions determined to support it. Commensurate with commission by the Board to publish DAMs it was felt that DAMs must be understood without additional access to HL7 or other IP that is restricted (not public). Needs to be sufficiently expressive and self contained. This is a guidance principle to the degree with which a DAM is refined to make it usable when publicly available. This definition does not speak to the form of a DAM, as much as its intent. He adds that DAMs must declare their rationale for creating or extending the DAM, but not address the entire functionality of the Domain. | ||
+ | #**Consensus is not sought today but presented as a conversation starter. Mead asks how the document will be distributed. Ron notes that it's up to the TSC. Austin hasn't given much thought to how to publish it. Is a wiki page sufficient, or something more formal. Ron adds that existing DAMs should not be seen as insufficient, but may need to be tweaked a little to be more conceptual and less physical. DAMs are only complete for a domain for the perspective and purpose for which they are created and assert that DAMs cannot fully express an entire domain. Elaborating that how one develops a DAM should not be in the definition, he describes there may be an implementation guide for HL7 purposes. John adds that it will be dependent on a context at the time the DAM is created. With the SHALLs in place for the definition of a DAM, we might allow a DAM to be Normative. We may have to wait for the implementation guide, or perhaps we cannot wait that long. | ||
+ | #Reports: (attach written reports below from Steering Divisions et al.) | ||
+ | #WGM Planning - | ||
+ | #*[[2012-05-12_TSC_WGM_Agenda]] | ||
+ | #**Q1 strategic issues | ||
+ | #**Q2 SAIF IG, Tooling Strategy, DAM definition | ||
+ | #**Q3 TSC projects review | ||
+ | #**Q4 TSC defining documents, communication plan, three year plan | ||
+ | Adjourned 11:53 AM EDT | ||
− | |||
===Next Steps=== | ===Next Steps=== | ||
{|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" | {|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" | ||
|- | |- | ||
|colspan="4" |'''Actions''' ''(Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)''<br/> | |colspan="4" |'''Actions''' ''(Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)''<br/> | ||
− | * . | + | * Lynn will forward the SDOs concall meeting invitation to the TSC admins list.. |
|- | |- | ||
|colspan="4" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/> | |colspan="4" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/> | ||
− | *. | + | *[[2012-04-23 TSC Call Agenda]]. |
|} | |} | ||
© 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved. | © 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved. |
Revision as of 16:09, 16 April 2012
TSC Agenda/Minutes
Meeting Info/Attendees
HL7 TSC Meeting Minutes Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371# |
Date: 2012-04-16 Time: 11:00 AM U.S. Eastern | |
Facilitator: Austin Kreisler | Note taker(s): Lynn Laakso |
Quorum = chair + 5 including 2 SD represented | yes/no | ||||||
Chair/CTO | ArB | International Affiliate Rep | Ad-Hoc | ||||
x | Austin Kreisler | . | Charlie Mead | x | Ravi Natarajan | 1st half | Helen Stevens |
x | John Quinn | x | Ron Parker | regrets | Giorgio Cangioli | ||
Domain Experts | Foundation and Technology | Structure and Semantic Design | Technical and Support Services | ||||
regrets | Ed Tripp | regrets | Woody Beeler | x | Calvin Beebe | x | Freida Hall |
x | Mead Walker | . | Tony Julian | . | Pat van Dyke | x | Patrick Loyd |
ex officio | Invited Guests | Observers | HL7 Staff | ||||
. | Don Mon (HL7 Chair) w/vote | x | Ken McCaslin | . | obs1 | x | Lynn Laakso |
. | Bob Dolin (Vice Chair) |
. | tba | . | obs2 | . | |
. | Chuck Jaffe (CEO) |
. | tba | . | . | . | |
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- Introduction of visitors (including declaration of interests)
- Agenda review and approval - Austin Kreisler
- Approve Minutes of 2012-04-09 TSC Call Agenda
- Review action items –
- Approval items:
- Approve Project Scope Statement for Electronic Services WG of T3SD for Develop HL7 Ballot Site Education Tutorial, at Project Insight #877, TSC Tracker # 2241.
- Approve Project Scope Statement for Education WG of T3SD for Electronic Certification Testing, at Project Insight #882, TSC Tracker # 2242.
- Approve Out of Cycle Ballot request for CIC WG of DESD, cosponsored by RCRIM, for HL7 Version 3 Domain Analysis Model: Schizophrenia, Release 1, at Project Insight # 840 and TSC Tracker 2243.
- Approve withdrawal request for EHR WG of SSD SD for Electronic Health Record System Lifecycle Model, at Project Insight # 201, TSC Tracker # 2228.
- Approve withdrawal request for EHR WG of SSD SD for Electronic Health Record Interoperability Model, at Project Insight # 261, TSC Tracker # 2244.
- Discussion topics:
- Proposed Domain Analysis Model Definition from ArB
- International perspective on Activities with Other SDOs (Austin)
- Reports: (attach written reports below from Steering Divisions et al.)
- WGM Planning -
- Open Issues List
Supporting Documents
- See links
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
- Introduction of visitors (including declaration of interests) Ken joins the call on the ES projects
- Agenda review and approval - Austin Kreisler approved by general consent
- Approve Minutes of 2012-04-09 TSC Call Agenda, Helen, Ravi abstain, approved 4/0/2.
- Review action items –
- Approval items:
- Motion: Approve Project Scope Statement for Electronic Services WG of T3SD for Develop HL7 Ballot Site Education Tutorial, at Project Insight #877, TSC Tracker # 2241.
- Going to meet Thursday Q2 at WGM, hope to have final tutorial by January 2013. Tutorial would not be offered at WGM as participants are probably involved in WG meetings so targeted for a web-based tutorial.
- Vote: unanimously approved. Ken leaves the call.
- Motion: Approve Project Scope Statement for Education WG of T3SD for Electronic Certification Testing, at Project Insight #882, TSC Tracker # 2242.
- Patrick joins the call, and discusses this project. Another project would likely be the outcome of this project.
- Vote: unanimously approved.
- Motion: Approve Out of Cycle Ballot request for CIC WG of DESD, cosponsored by RCRIM, for HL7 Version 3 Domain Analysis Model: Schizophrenia, Release 1, at Project Insight # 840 and TSC Tracker 2243.
- Neither Ed nor Mead available to describe.
- Vote: unanimously approved.
- Approve withdrawal request for EHR WG of SSD SD for Electronic Health Record System Lifecycle Model, at Project Insight # 201, TSC Tracker # 2228.
- Helen comments that this and the following work have been merged with the EHR-S FM R2 and are not needed in their past DSTU form.
- Vote: unanimously approved.
- Approve withdrawal request for EHR WG of SSD SD for Electronic Health Record Interoperability Model, at Project Insight # 261, TSC Tracker # 2244.
- Vote: unanimously approved.
- Motion: Approve Project Scope Statement for Electronic Services WG of T3SD for Develop HL7 Ballot Site Education Tutorial, at Project Insight #877, TSC Tracker # 2241.
- Discussion topics:
- Mead joins the call.
- International perspective on Activities with Other SDOs (Austin) - Austin notes with Helen's pending departure at the bottom of the hour he wishes to move this up. Topic this time is actual implementers' experience in moving a project through multiple SDOs. Would like to hear from at least one affiliate-based project to participate on the panel. Ravi notes that NHS would probably have some experience and he will check around. Last time was leaders of the SDOs themselves on the panel. Ravi notes that he will ask Nicholas Oughtibridge to participate if he's able to attend the WGM. Panel meeting is Sunday Q4, with the next concall this Thursday 4/19 at 1 pm. Ravi will email the International Council list to invite participation as well. Mead suggests they ask the question which affiliate projects involved participation among SDOs. John notes that by the time of the Vancouver meeting the US will be building an organization to do that between the ISO US TAG and the SCO. Canadian Standards Collaborative is similar - Helen will discuss with Melva. ACTION ITEM: Lynn will forward the concall meeting invitation to the TSC admins list.
- Proposed Domain Analysis Model Definition from ArB
- Patrick notes they had a three hour meeting that only took 2 hrs. Ron made some subtle additions he just updated on the wiki. Austin wishes the TSC members to review it briefly and thinks it warrants further discussion in Vancouver.
- Ron discusses some of the assumptions determined to support it. Commensurate with commission by the Board to publish DAMs it was felt that DAMs must be understood without additional access to HL7 or other IP that is restricted (not public). Needs to be sufficiently expressive and self contained. This is a guidance principle to the degree with which a DAM is refined to make it usable when publicly available. This definition does not speak to the form of a DAM, as much as its intent. He adds that DAMs must declare their rationale for creating or extending the DAM, but not address the entire functionality of the Domain.
- Consensus is not sought today but presented as a conversation starter. Mead asks how the document will be distributed. Ron notes that it's up to the TSC. Austin hasn't given much thought to how to publish it. Is a wiki page sufficient, or something more formal. Ron adds that existing DAMs should not be seen as insufficient, but may need to be tweaked a little to be more conceptual and less physical. DAMs are only complete for a domain for the perspective and purpose for which they are created and assert that DAMs cannot fully express an entire domain. Elaborating that how one develops a DAM should not be in the definition, he describes there may be an implementation guide for HL7 purposes. John adds that it will be dependent on a context at the time the DAM is created. With the SHALLs in place for the definition of a DAM, we might allow a DAM to be Normative. We may have to wait for the implementation guide, or perhaps we cannot wait that long.
- Reports: (attach written reports below from Steering Divisions et al.)
- WGM Planning -
- 2012-05-12_TSC_WGM_Agenda
- Q1 strategic issues
- Q2 SAIF IG, Tooling Strategy, DAM definition
- Q3 TSC projects review
- Q4 TSC defining documents, communication plan, three year plan
- 2012-05-12_TSC_WGM_Agenda
Adjourned 11:53 AM EDT
Next Steps
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
| |||
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
© 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.