Difference between revisions of "Mission and Charter Update"

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: Return to Domain Experts Electronic Voting Summaries Please vote on the updated Mission and Charter statement from the Patient Care work group. Enter your name and Work Group along wi...)
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Return to [[Domain Experts Electronic Voting Summaries]]
 
Return to [[Domain Experts Electronic Voting Summaries]]
  
Please vote on the updated Mission and Charter statement from the Patient Care work group. Enter your name and Work Group along with your vote. Only one vote per Work Group please. Any comments added through the poll should also be distributed to the DESD list server.  
+
Please vote on the updated Mission and Charter statement from the Attachments work group. enter your name and Work Group along with your vote. Only one vote per Work Group please. Any comments added through the poll should also be distributed to the DESD list server.  
  
 
Link to document:  
 
Link to document:  
http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/desd/scmsvn/?action=browse&path=%2F%2Acheckout%2A%2Ftrunk%2FDocuments%2FMissionAndCharters%2FMission%2526ScopestatementPatientCare.doc&revision=8363
+
http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/desd/scmsvn/?action=browse&path=%2F%2Acheckout%2A%2Ftrunk%2FDocuments%2FMissionAndCharters%2FAttachment-MissionStatement-Charter.doc&revision=8361
  
 
Summary - Passed (8/0/1/4)
 
Summary - Passed (8/0/1/4)
Line 26: Line 26:
  
 
*Comments
 
*Comments
**Melvin Reynolds October 17, 2009 10:55:01 AM EDT  Voting positive because it seems to say the right things - and more besides ;) We note that the list of internal relationships is long, but still does fully reflect reality, and therefore question the value of such listings for groups that are by their nature horizontal in their relationships.
+
**Edward Tripp November 6, 2009 2:46:16 PM EST  On 11/6/2009, I withdraw my negative and change it to approve based on feedback from HL7 on the status of agreements with WEDI and Loinc
**Rita Altamore (PHER) October 7, 2009 3:34:35 PM EDT  The current format differs from the M&C template, but the required content appears to be present. PHER has voted affirmative but suggests closer adherence to the template.
+
**Crystal Kallem October 12, 2009 10:58:36 AM EDT  Voting affirmative pending incorporation of Ed's suggested amendment below
**Edward Tripp October 6, 2009 11:55:21 AM EDT  This document does not follow the structure and content outlined in the Work Group Mission and Charter guidelines found on the HL7 website under templates. Ed
+
**Edward Tripp October 1, 2009 1:54:09 PM EDT  The WEDI associate charter agreement expired in January 2009. There is no formal agreement with Loinc at this time. I recommend moving the statement "The work group also collaborates with Workgroup for Electronic Data Interchange (WEDI) and the Regenstrief Institute in conjunction with the LOINC® (Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes) Committee. " to the top of the document rather than having it listed in formal agreements.
 +
**Melvin Reynolds (DEV) October 1, 2009 1:00:03 PM EDT  To judge by the collaborations mentioned this WG is primarily US-focussed, if this is an exclusive focus it may be useful to mention that? On the other hand, if the scope is in reality (as opposed to aspiration!) wider, then a statement about that would be useful too.

Latest revision as of 16:50, 16 November 2009

Return to Domain Experts Electronic Voting Summaries

Please vote on the updated Mission and Charter statement from the Attachments work group. enter your name and Work Group along with your vote. Only one vote per Work Group please. Any comments added through the poll should also be distributed to the DESD list server.

Link to document: http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/desd/scmsvn/?action=browse&path=%2F%2Acheckout%2A%2Ftrunk%2FDocuments%2FMissionAndCharters%2FAttachment-MissionStatement-Charter.doc&revision=8361

Summary - Passed (8/0/1/4)

  • History: DESD: Mission & Charter Update from Attachments
    • 10/1/09 5:31:51 PM CEST · Austin Kreisler · Poll added by "Austin Kreisler"
    • 10/1/09 6:04:44 PM CEST · Joy Kuhl (Child Health) · Participant "Joy Kuhl (Child Health)" added OK: Affirmative
    • 10/1/09 6:56:56 PM CEST · Melvin Reynolds (DEV) · Participant "Melvin Reynolds (DEV)" added OK: Affirmative
    • 10/1/09 7:00:03 PM CEST · Melvin Reynolds (DEV) · Comment by "Melvin Reynolds (DEV)" added
    • 10/1/09 7:54:09 PM CEST · Edward Tripp · Comment by "Edward Tripp" added
    • 10/2/09 9:40:18 PM CEST · Helmut Koenig (II) · Participant "Helmut Koenig (II)" added OK: Affirmative
    • 10/4/09 4:14:30 PM CEST · Rita Altamore (PHER) · Participant "Rita Altamore (PHER)" added OK: Affirmative
    • 10/6/09 6:02:09 PM CEST · Ed Tripp (RCRIM) · Participant "Ed Tripp (RCRIM)" added OK: Negative
    • 10/12/09 4:58:36 PM CEST · Crystal Kallem · Comment by "Crystal Kallem" added
    • 10/12/09 4:58:57 PM CEST · Crystal Kallem (CIC) · Participant "Crystal Kallem (CIC)" added OK: Affirmative
    • 11/6/09 8:44:56 PM CET · Ed Tripp (RCRIM) · Participant "Ed Tripp (RCRIM)" changed OK: Affirmative
    • 11/6/09 8:46:16 PM CET · Edward Tripp · Comment by "Edward Tripp" added
    • 11/10/09 8:07:48 PM CET · Lise Stevens (Patient Safety) · Participant "Lise Stevens (Patient Safety)" added OK: Affirmative
    • 11/11/09 11:19:31 AM CET · Alan Nicol (Anesthesiology) · Participant "Alan Nicol (Anesthesiology)" added OK: Abstain
    • 11/16/09 4:26:01 PM CET · Austin Kreisler (DESD) · Participant "Austin Kreisler (DESD)" added OK: Affirmative
  • Comments
    • Edward Tripp November 6, 2009 2:46:16 PM EST On 11/6/2009, I withdraw my negative and change it to approve based on feedback from HL7 on the status of agreements with WEDI and Loinc
    • Crystal Kallem October 12, 2009 10:58:36 AM EDT Voting affirmative pending incorporation of Ed's suggested amendment below
    • Edward Tripp October 1, 2009 1:54:09 PM EDT The WEDI associate charter agreement expired in January 2009. There is no formal agreement with Loinc at this time. I recommend moving the statement "The work group also collaborates with Workgroup for Electronic Data Interchange (WEDI) and the Regenstrief Institute in conjunction with the LOINC® (Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes) Committee. " to the top of the document rather than having it listed in formal agreements.
    • Melvin Reynolds (DEV) October 1, 2009 1:00:03 PM EDT To judge by the collaborations mentioned this WG is primarily US-focussed, if this is an exclusive focus it may be useful to mention that? On the other hand, if the scope is in reality (as opposed to aspiration!) wider, then a statement about that would be useful too.