Difference between revisions of "Infrastructure SD Agenda item list"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Anne wizauer (talk | contribs) m (Anne wizauer moved page FTSD Agenda item list to Infrastructure SD Agenda item list) |
|||
| (17 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Future Agenda Items == | ==Future Agenda Items == | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | Enter your proposed agenda items, supporting documents, and the meeting/date when you expect the issue to the resolved: | |
| − | + | ||
| − | == Infrastructure Release == | + | |
| + | |||
| + | === Infrastructure Release (due to be closed at the San Diego WGM) === | ||
Please could the SD discuss the positioning of the various infrastructure revision projects that are underway. | Please could the SD discuss the positioning of the various infrastructure revision projects that are underway. | ||
At the WGM I was tasked by INM TC and ITS SIG to raise this issue. There are a number of infrastructure improvements currently being worked on, that are likely to be published as DSTU in the next 6 months. It would seem sensible to promote these as a combined "major release", that is made normative and marketed as a single platform enhancement. Maybe other product lines could also be timed to be released at the same time. | At the WGM I was tasked by INM TC and ITS SIG to raise this issue. There are a number of infrastructure improvements currently being worked on, that are likely to be published as DSTU in the next 6 months. It would seem sensible to promote these as a combined "major release", that is made normative and marketed as a single platform enhancement. Maybe other product lines could also be timed to be released at the same time. | ||
So far the technical work on what changes are worthwhile is being done, learning from over five years of implementation experience -- but the work on how to position those changes in the marketplace has not been done | So far the technical work on what changes are worthwhile is being done, learning from over five years of implementation experience -- but the work on how to position those changes in the marketplace has not been done | ||
| − | ==Web Site Migration prioritization due October 22nd, 2007== | + | |
| + | ===Parking Lot === | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Resolved Items== | ||
| + | === Web Site Migration prioritization due October 22nd, 2007 === | ||
| + | === Harmonization (closed, included in the HDF) === | ||
| + | Document and approve the current rules and processes for harmonization | ||
| + | * Harmonization requests may follows the same process as described in the HDF = Change Control Process | ||
| + | ** * [http://www.hl7.org/harmonization/ Harmonization Web Site] | ||
| + | [[image:7.4_Change_Control_Process.gif]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Project Approval Process (closed)=== | ||
| + | *--[[User:Ioana13|Ioana13]] 19:47, 29 October 2007 (PDT) | ||
| + | *The project approval process was updated to reflect the new organizational structure | ||
| + | *Charlie McCay would like to add some sort of capability to publish the scope statements during the approval process | ||
| + | ** [http://www.hl7.org/Library/Committees/arb/HL7_Project_Scope_Statement_2008JAN.zip Project Scope Statement - Word Document Template ] | ||
| + | [[Image:Project_Initiation_and_Approval_draft_V.2.gif]] | ||
---- | ---- | ||
[[Foundation_%26_Technology_Steering_Division_Home| Back to Home Page]] | [[Foundation_%26_Technology_Steering_Division_Home| Back to Home Page]] | ||
Latest revision as of 20:24, 20 April 2018
Contents
Future Agenda Items
Enter your proposed agenda items, supporting documents, and the meeting/date when you expect the issue to the resolved:
Infrastructure Release (due to be closed at the San Diego WGM)
Please could the SD discuss the positioning of the various infrastructure revision projects that are underway. At the WGM I was tasked by INM TC and ITS SIG to raise this issue. There are a number of infrastructure improvements currently being worked on, that are likely to be published as DSTU in the next 6 months. It would seem sensible to promote these as a combined "major release", that is made normative and marketed as a single platform enhancement. Maybe other product lines could also be timed to be released at the same time.
So far the technical work on what changes are worthwhile is being done, learning from over five years of implementation experience -- but the work on how to position those changes in the marketplace has not been done
Parking Lot
Resolved Items
Web Site Migration prioritization due October 22nd, 2007
Harmonization (closed, included in the HDF)
Document and approve the current rules and processes for harmonization
- Harmonization requests may follows the same process as described in the HDF = Change Control Process
Project Approval Process (closed)
- --Ioana13 19:47, 29 October 2007 (PDT)
- The project approval process was updated to reflect the new organizational structure
- Charlie McCay would like to add some sort of capability to publish the scope statements during the approval process
