Difference between revisions of "2016-03-28 TSC Call Agenda"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Anne wizauer (talk | contribs) |
Anne wizauer (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
*Approval items: | *Approval items: | ||
**VOTE on proposed revisions to the GOM | **VOTE on proposed revisions to the GOM | ||
| − | + | **Freida states we should pull out voting on the technical report item (WI1601006) as the changes are not complete and it includes reference to the HL7 Technical Newsletter which no longer exists. Suggestion to replace that with the Update from the TSC. | |
| − | + | ***MOTION to accept the remaining updates to the GOM; Calvin seconds. | |
| − | + | ***VOTE: all in favor. | |
| − | + | ***ACTION to add update to next week's agenda | |
**Ballot issue from Lynn: Neutral Mapping Notation ballot has "under the covers" a comment-only revision of the Clinical Quality Language ballot material. Can this be allowed to proceed into ballot? | **Ballot issue from Lynn: Neutral Mapping Notation ballot has "under the covers" a comment-only revision of the Clinical Quality Language ballot material. Can this be allowed to proceed into ballot? | ||
***Has at its core something called "fluent path." Paul states it's an HL7 name they're trying out with the ballot. Materials proposed have changes to CQL. Paul says it's trying to call out that if the new mapping language is used, parts of CQL would have to change. Would not be binding changes. Lynn: we need to rearrange the material to make it clear that we're not balloting a change to CQL material. Paul states it's okay to pull the material in question. | ***Has at its core something called "fluent path." Paul states it's an HL7 name they're trying out with the ballot. Materials proposed have changes to CQL. Paul says it's trying to call out that if the new mapping language is used, parts of CQL would have to change. Would not be binding changes. Lynn: we need to rearrange the material to make it clear that we're not balloting a change to CQL material. Paul states it's okay to pull the material in question. | ||
***MOTION by Paul to pull the CQL materials out of the ballot as they do not meet the criteria to go to ballot. Second by Austin. The remaining material will go to ballot. Gora: Is there any lesson for any other WGs in this situation? Further discussion reveals this was a mistake as opposed to a systemic problem. | ***MOTION by Paul to pull the CQL materials out of the ballot as they do not meet the criteria to go to ballot. Second by Austin. The remaining material will go to ballot. Gora: Is there any lesson for any other WGs in this situation? Further discussion reveals this was a mistake as opposed to a systemic problem. | ||
***VOTE: all in favor | ***VOTE: all in favor | ||
| + | |||
====Management==== | ====Management==== | ||
*Review [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemBrowse&tracker_id=494 action items] – | *Review [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemBrowse&tracker_id=494 action items] – | ||
Revision as of 20:32, 29 March 2016
TSC Agenda/Minutes
Meeting Info/Attendees
Standing Conference Calls
TSC will hold a Conference Call at 11AM Eastern time, each Monday except during scheduled face-to-face Working Group Meetings unless otherwise noted at TSC_Minutes_and_Agendas.
- GoToMeeting at https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/426505829 using VOIP
- For those without access to microphone/speakers:
- US: +1 (224)501-3318
- Canada: +1 (647)497-9379
- Italy: +39 0 230 57 81 80
- Access Code: 426-505-829
- GoToMeeting ID: 426-505-829
| HL7 TSC Meeting Minutes Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371# |
Date: 2016-03-21 Time: 11:00 AM U.S. Eastern | |
| Facilitator: Ken McCaslin | Note taker(s): Anne Wizauer | |
| Quorum = chair + 5 including 2 SD represented | yes/no | ||||||
| Chair/CTO | ArB | International Affiliate Rep | Ad-Hoc | ||||
| x | Ken McCaslin | . | Tony Julian | x | Jean Duteau | x | Austin Kreisler |
| x | Wayne Kubick | . | Lorraine Constable | . | Giorgio Cangioli | x | Freida Hall, GOM Expert |
| . | . | . | . | Woody Beeler, TSC Member Emeritus | |||
| Domain Experts | Foundation and Technology | Structure and Semantic Design | Technical and Support Services | ||||
| x | Melva Peters | . | Russ Hamm | x | Calvin Beebe | x | Andy Stechishin |
| x | John Roberts | x | Paul Knapp | x | Gora Datta | . | Sandra Stuart |
| . | . | . | . | ||||
| ex officio | Invited Guests | Observers | HL7 Staff | ||||
| . | Pat Van Dyke (HL7 Chair) w/vote | . | . | obs1 | x | Anne Wizauer | |
| . | Chuck Jaffe (CEO) |
x | Lynn Laakso | . | obs2 | . |
|
| . | . | . | . | . | |||
Agenda
Housekeeping
- Introduction of visitors (including declaration of interests)
- Agenda review and approval -
- Approve Minutes of 2016-03-21 TSC Call Agenda
Governance
- Approval items:
- VOTE on proposed revisions to the GOM
- Ballot issue from Lynn: Neutral Mapping Notation ballot has "under the covers" a comment-only revision of the Clinical Quality Language ballot material. Can this be allowed to proceed into ballot?
- Discussion topics:
Management
- Review action items –
- Pat to report back on EC discussion on endorsements
- Pat to check with Karen regarding what is in the Board minutes regarding IP discussion
- Melva to follow up on Anesthesia/Health Care Devices move -
- Anne to invite Lynn to join 3/28 call to discuss single base balloting spreadsheet
- Followup on Project Approval Request for the TSC project Revise Process to Withdraw Protocol Specifications at TSC Tracker 9691
- Andy to coordinate with Publishing and PIC -
- ARB to add to their agenda
- Approval items from last week's e-vote approved 7/0/0 with ARB, FTSD, SSD-SD, T3SD, Wayne, Freida, and Jean voting:
- Project Approval Request of HL7 Cross-Paradigm Neutral Mapping Notation, Release 1 at Project Insight 1237 and TSC Tracker 9743
- DSTU Publication Request for an unballoted update of Laboratory Value Set Companion Guide, Release 1 – US Realm at Project Insight 792 and TSC Tracker 9658 - updated as a result of comments from previous TSC review
- WG has agreed to change the version to 1.1 as it's an unballoted update.
- DSTU Publication Request of an unballoted update to HL7 CDA® R2 Implementation Guide: Quality Reporting Document Architecture - Category I (QRDA I), Release 1, STU Release 3.1 (US Realm) at Project Insight 210 and TSC Tracker 9744
- Approval Items for this week:
- Discussion topics:
- Review of projects open 4+ years - 20 minutes
- Next steps in project to research a tool to replace gforge that supports online multi-user ballot item resolution
- Reports: (attach written reports below from Steering Divisions et al.)
- Open Issues List
Minutes
- Agenda review and approval -
- Approve Minutes of 2016-03-21 TSC Call Agenda
Governance
- Approval items:
- VOTE on proposed revisions to the GOM
- Freida states we should pull out voting on the technical report item (WI1601006) as the changes are not complete and it includes reference to the HL7 Technical Newsletter which no longer exists. Suggestion to replace that with the Update from the TSC.
- MOTION to accept the remaining updates to the GOM; Calvin seconds.
- VOTE: all in favor.
- ACTION to add update to next week's agenda
- Ballot issue from Lynn: Neutral Mapping Notation ballot has "under the covers" a comment-only revision of the Clinical Quality Language ballot material. Can this be allowed to proceed into ballot?
- Has at its core something called "fluent path." Paul states it's an HL7 name they're trying out with the ballot. Materials proposed have changes to CQL. Paul says it's trying to call out that if the new mapping language is used, parts of CQL would have to change. Would not be binding changes. Lynn: we need to rearrange the material to make it clear that we're not balloting a change to CQL material. Paul states it's okay to pull the material in question.
- MOTION by Paul to pull the CQL materials out of the ballot as they do not meet the criteria to go to ballot. Second by Austin. The remaining material will go to ballot. Gora: Is there any lesson for any other WGs in this situation? Further discussion reveals this was a mistake as opposed to a systemic problem.
- VOTE: all in favor
Management
- Review action items –
- Pat to report back on EC discussion on endorsements - next week
- Pat to check with Karen regarding what is in the Board minutes regarding IP discussion - next week
- Melva to follow up on Anesthesia/Health Care Devices move - next week
- Anne to invite Lynn to join 3/28 call to discuss single base balloting spreadsheet
- Lynn reports that Lloyd has provided her with a unique spreadsheet that she has not yet fully tested against the macros. It is conceivable that if gforge is used for all comment reconciliation, it would be the spreadsheet that would be used. Ken: how much time to you need to do the evaluation? Lynn: I could get to it in a week after the ballot is open. Ken asks her to report back on 2016-04-11 call. Freida: I didn't' think we were going to implement the spreadsheet in this ballot cycle. Is there a way to hide the columns that don't apply, like FHIR specific columns? If that isn't built in it should be before it's put into use. Lynn: the one FHIR ballot (CQF on FHIR) is using it for this cycle; everyone else is using the usual template.
- ACTION: Lynn to report back on spreadsheet testing on 2016-04-11 call
- Lynn reports that Lloyd has provided her with a unique spreadsheet that she has not yet fully tested against the macros. It is conceivable that if gforge is used for all comment reconciliation, it would be the spreadsheet that would be used. Ken: how much time to you need to do the evaluation? Lynn: I could get to it in a week after the ballot is open. Ken asks her to report back on 2016-04-11 call. Freida: I didn't' think we were going to implement the spreadsheet in this ballot cycle. Is there a way to hide the columns that don't apply, like FHIR specific columns? If that isn't built in it should be before it's put into use. Lynn: the one FHIR ballot (CQF on FHIR) is using it for this cycle; everyone else is using the usual template.
- Followup on Project Approval Request for the TSC project Revise Process to Withdraw Protocol Specifications at TSC Tracker 9691
- Andy to coordinate with Publishing and PIC - has sent on; waiting for update
- ARB to add to their agenda - next week
- Approval items from last week's e-vote approved 7/0/0 with ARB, FTSD, SSD-SD, T3SD, Wayne, Freida, and Jean voting:
- Project Approval Request of HL7 Cross-Paradigm Neutral Mapping Notation, Release 1 at Project Insight 1237 and TSC Tracker 9743
- DSTU Publication Request for an unballoted update of Laboratory Value Set Companion Guide, Release 1 – US Realm at Project Insight 792 and TSC Tracker 9658 - updated as a result of comments from previous TSC review
- DSTU Publication Request of an unballoted update to HL7 CDA® R2 Implementation Guide: Quality Reporting Document Architecture - Category I (QRDA I), Release 1, STU Release 3.1 (US Realm) at Project Insight 210 and TSC Tracker 9744
- Approval Items for this week:
- Discussion topics:
- Review of projects open 4+ years - 20 minutes
- FTSD: haven't reviewed as of yet. Will take it and fraction it up by committee and then have the committees report back. Ken suggests circling around at WGM. Melva clarifies that all of the start dates are four years or greater, and the ask is for steering divisions to go back to the WGs to either get the projects updated or closed. Ken agrees that's correct. Sponsoring WG(s) are responsible. Calvin agrees that we might not get much movement until face to face meetings on Monday night at the WGM.
- ACTION: Add discussion to TSC Wednesday lunch.
- FTSD: haven't reviewed as of yet. Will take it and fraction it up by committee and then have the committees report back. Ken suggests circling around at WGM. Melva clarifies that all of the start dates are four years or greater, and the ask is for steering divisions to go back to the WGs to either get the projects updated or closed. Ken agrees that's correct. Sponsoring WG(s) are responsible. Calvin agrees that we might not get much movement until face to face meetings on Monday night at the WGM.
- Next steps in project to research a tool to replace gforge that supports online multi-user ballot item resolution
- Paul: do we have a set of requirements? Are we looking at an overall tool replacement or finding a tool that supports online multi-user ballot item resolution? Wayne: it's an overall tool replacement. Wayne is pulling together a PSS that will come forward to the TSC that is currently under review by EST. Freida: We also have talked of using the tracker for multi-year planning; there has been some review of tracker in that project.
Next Steps
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
| |||
| Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
© 2016 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.
