Difference between revisions of "2016-03-07 TSC Call Agenda"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Anne wizauer (talk | contribs) |
Anne wizauer (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
#*Project services/Publishing report on sunset process - update from Freida | #*Project services/Publishing report on sunset process - update from Freida | ||
#*Continued discussion on project approval/NIB deadline guidelines - ideas from last week include 1) declaring that the project is not approved on the NIB form and 2) having a warning pop up when you attempt to submit the NIB | #*Continued discussion on project approval/NIB deadline guidelines - ideas from last week include 1) declaring that the project is not approved on the NIB form and 2) having a warning pop up when you attempt to submit the NIB | ||
+ | #**Discussion from last week: Paul created a NIB and it wouldn't let him file it unless TSC approval had been secured. Would it be better to pull the item from the ballot if materials aren't approved closer to the ballot? As we add more steps it stretches out the timeline. Discussion over doing a final checkpoint some number of weeks before the ballot opens. Andy suggests engaging the project facilitators. Not allowing to enter the NIB is too early. Freida: is three weeks out at the content deadline reasonable? Andy: on the V3 side we have a variety of deadlines that serve as triggers. We need to push some of the responsibility back on the project facilitators. They need to make sure it goes through the necessary approvals and record them. Freida: maybe there could be a warning with the deadline when you attempt to submit the NIB. Paul: we should have to declare that the project is not approved rather than lie about it. | ||
#Reports: (attach written reports below from Steering Divisions et al.) | #Reports: (attach written reports below from Steering Divisions et al.) | ||
<!-- #WGM Planning - --> | <!-- #WGM Planning - --> |
Revision as of 14:55, 7 March 2016
TSC Agenda/Minutes
Meeting Info/Attendees
Standing Conference Calls
TSC will hold a Conference Call at 11AM Eastern time, each Monday except during scheduled face-to-face Working Group Meetings unless otherwise noted at TSC_Minutes_and_Agendas.
- GoToMeeting at https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/426505829 using VOIP
- For those without access to microphone/speakers:
- US: +1 (224)501-3318
- Canada: +1 (647)497-9379
- Italy: +39 0 230 57 81 80
- Access Code: 426-505-829
- GoToMeeting ID: 426-505-829
HL7 TSC Meeting Minutes Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371# |
Date: 2016-03-07 Time: 11:00 AM U.S. Eastern | |
Facilitator: Ken McCaslin | Note taker(s): Anne Wizauer |
Quorum = chair + 5 including 2 SD represented | yes/no | ||||||
Chair/CTO | ArB | International Affiliate Rep | Ad-Hoc | ||||
. | Ken McCaslin | . | Tony Julian | . | Jean Duteau | . | Austin Kreisler |
. | Wayne Kubick | . | Lorraine Constable | . | Giorgio Cangioli | . | Freida Hall, GOM Expert |
. | . | . | . | Woody Beeler, TSC Member Emeritus | |||
Domain Experts | Foundation and Technology | Structure and Semantic Design | Technical and Support Services | ||||
. | Melva Peters | . | Russ Hamm | . | Calvin Beebe | . | Andy Stechishin |
. | John Roberts | . | Paul Knapp | . | Pat van Dyke | . | Sandra Stuart |
. | . | . | . | ||||
ex officio | Invited Guests | Observers | HL7 Staff | ||||
. | Pat Van Dyke (HL7 Chair) w/vote | . | . | obs1 | . | Anne Wizauer | |
. | Chuck Jaffe (CEO) |
. | . | . | obs2 | . |
|
. | . | . | . | . | |||
Agenda
Housekeeping
- Introduction of visitors (including declaration of interests)
- Agenda review and approval -
- Approve Minutes of 2016-02-29 TSC Call Agenda
Governance
- Approval items:
- Review of e-Vote of 2016May ballot items
- Discussion topics:
Management
- Review action items –
- Melva to report back on progress with Anesthesia's move into Healthcare Devices
- Anne to provide list to TSC of projects open greater than 4 years including next milestone date
- Approval items from last week's e-vote referred for discussion:
- Unballoted DSTU Update Publication Request by the O&O WG of the SSD-SD of Laboratory Value Set Companion Guide, Release 1 at Project Insight 922 and TSC Tracker 9658
- Referred by T3SD: DSTU Update section has not been completed
- Referred by Austin: This looks like this is an unballoted DSTU Update, but no review process was documented.
- Unballoted DSTU Update Publication Request by the O&O WG of the SSD-SD of Laboratory Value Set Companion Guide, Release 1 at Project Insight 922 and TSC Tracker 9658
- Approval items from Last Week's e-Vote approved 3/1/0 with T3SD, DESD, Freida, and Austin voting: Quorum not reached in e-vote
- Informative Publication Request by the CBCC WG of the DESD of HL7 Version 3 Domain Analysis Model: Behavioral Health Record, Release 2 at Project Insight 1174 and TSC Tracker 9657
- Note from Freida: Lynn/TSC requested ANSI Technical Report be removed from the GOM, which is in the queue for the May 2016 GOM update (attached). Suggest we don’t approve the ANSI TR request and update the Publication Request template to remove the ANSI Technical report question.
- DSTU Extension and Unballoted DSTU Update Request by the CQI WG of the DESD of HL7 Implementation Guide for CDA® Release 2: Quality Reporting Document Architecture - Category III (QRDA III), DSTU Release 1.1 at Projec Insight 1174 and TSC Tracker 9659
- Informative Publication Request by the CBCC WG of the DESD of HL7 Version 3 Domain Analysis Model: Behavioral Health Record, Release 2 at Project Insight 1174 and TSC Tracker 9657
- Discussion topics:
- Continued discussion on ONC Conformance testing question around gathering data for an annual report of implementations and usage of our guides. - Karen, Dave
- Project services/Publishing report on sunset process - update from Freida
- Continued discussion on project approval/NIB deadline guidelines - ideas from last week include 1) declaring that the project is not approved on the NIB form and 2) having a warning pop up when you attempt to submit the NIB
- Discussion from last week: Paul created a NIB and it wouldn't let him file it unless TSC approval had been secured. Would it be better to pull the item from the ballot if materials aren't approved closer to the ballot? As we add more steps it stretches out the timeline. Discussion over doing a final checkpoint some number of weeks before the ballot opens. Andy suggests engaging the project facilitators. Not allowing to enter the NIB is too early. Freida: is three weeks out at the content deadline reasonable? Andy: on the V3 side we have a variety of deadlines that serve as triggers. We need to push some of the responsibility back on the project facilitators. They need to make sure it goes through the necessary approvals and record them. Freida: maybe there could be a warning with the deadline when you attempt to submit the NIB. Paul: we should have to declare that the project is not approved rather than lie about it.
- Reports: (attach written reports below from Steering Divisions et al.)
- Open Issues List
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
Next Steps
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
| |||
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
© 2016 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.