Difference between revisions of "DESD PSS: Pharmacy FHIR Maintenance PSS"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Return to Domain Experts Electronic Voting Summaries Please vote on the PSS for the Pharmacy. Enter your name and WG along with your vote. 1 vote per WG. Poll open until ...") |
|||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
{| {{table}} border=1 | {| {{table}} border=1 | ||
| − | | | + | | Michael Tan Monday, February 1, 2016 1:47:54 o'clock PM GMT||Is there any indication of the amount of issues? Will the WG work on a time boxed manner and see how many issues can be solved in that period? Or will the issues determine when the end date will be? |
| − | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| || | | || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | Floyd Eisenberg (CQI) Friday, January 29, 2016 10:36:04 o'clock PM GMT||"Sorry - forgot to save my comment: | + | | Floyd Eisenberg (CQI) Friday, January 29, 2016 10:36:04 o'clock PM GMT||"Sorry - forgot to save my comment: The work effort seems appropriate. However, my understanding is that FHIR will not ballot v2.1 in May; rather it will go directly to a 3.0 ballot in September. Therefore, the timeline for reconciliation with FHIR 2.1 seems inconsistent. Perhaps a ballot in September 2016 with reconciliation with FHIR 3.0 is more appropriate. Please advise." |
| − | |||
| − | |||
|} | |} | ||
Latest revision as of 16:28, 15 February 2016
Return to Domain Experts Electronic Voting Summaries
Please vote on the PSS for the Pharmacy. Enter your name and WG along with your vote. 1 vote per WG. Poll open until February 9, 2016
Link to PSS Link to PSS
Updated PSS based on negative comments Link to Updated PSS
Work Group Health: Green Review of PBS Metrics: Green
- Summary -
- Number of participants: 10
- Most popular option: Affirmative
- Votes in favor: 9
- Comments: 2
- Non-participating work groups counted as abstaining solely for the purpose of counting quorum
| ' | Affirmative | Negative (with comments) | Abstain |
| John Rhoads (DEV) | OK | ||
| Floyd Eisenberg (CQI) | OK | ||
| edwardhelton BRIDG | OK | ||
| Melva Peters (Pharmacy) | OK | ||
| John Walsh (Anesthesia) | OK | ||
| Michael Tan (PCWG) | OK | ||
| Laura Heermann Langford (ECWG) | OK | ||
| Erin Holt Coyne (PHER) | OK | ||
| Dianne Reeves (CIC) | OK | ||
| Bob Milius (Clinical Genomics) | OK | ||
| John Kiser (RCRIM) | OK | ||
| Count | 10 | 1 | 0 |
| Michael Tan Monday, February 1, 2016 1:47:54 o'clock PM GMT | Is there any indication of the amount of issues? Will the WG work on a time boxed manner and see how many issues can be solved in that period? Or will the issues determine when the end date will be? |
| Floyd Eisenberg (CQI) Friday, January 29, 2016 10:36:04 o'clock PM GMT | "Sorry - forgot to save my comment: The work effort seems appropriate. However, my understanding is that FHIR will not ballot v2.1 in May; rather it will go directly to a 3.0 ballot in September. Therefore, the timeline for reconciliation with FHIR 2.1 seems inconsistent. Perhaps a ballot in September 2016 with reconciliation with FHIR 3.0 is more appropriate. Please advise." |
