Difference between revisions of "2015-06-10 TRAC"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Anne wizauer (talk | contribs) |
Anne wizauer (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
|colspan="2"|Chair/CTO ||colspan="2"|Members ||colspan="2"|Members | |colspan="2"|Chair/CTO ||colspan="2"|Members ||colspan="2"|Members | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | ||Pat Van Dyke|| ||Rick Haddorff|| ||Freida Hall | + | |x||Pat Van Dyke||x||Rick Haddorff|| ||Freida Hall |
|- | |- | ||
| − | |Regrets||Austin Kreisler || || Ken McCaslin|| || Melva Peters | + | |Regrets||Austin Kreisler || || Ken McCaslin||Regrets|| Melva Peters |
|- | |- | ||
| ||John Quinn || ||John Roberts|| || | | ||John Quinn || ||John Roberts|| || | ||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/> | '''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/> | ||
| − | * | + | *Opened with discussion regarding the successful Paris meeting. |
| + | *Referencing external materials: do we have responsibility to validate? If our standards have to be approved by ANSI, are the references as vigorous as they are? Andy and Paul had done some work on this last fall. Reviewed documents sent by Andy. Should we come up with a process or policy to add to publication guide? If reference is in a normative part of balloted materials that are then the standard, you’re then forced to keep it up to date or understand if changes have been or will be made. If referring to an ISO standard in the informative part of the material, for example, there shouldn’t be a need to update that unless there is a new ballot or reaffirmation. If the referred-to standard is in the normative part of the balloted material, then the change must be tracked. Pat will talk to Paul regarding where this issue originated. | ||
| + | *3-year planning: Rick states there hasn’t been much progress at this point but he will circle back with Ken this week. PSS is owned by TSC at this point. Pat suggests having some sit-down time with co-chairs to go over things at WGM. | ||
| + | *Will meet again the 17th but not the 24th. We will meet the 1st and the 8th of July, but not the 15th, 22nd, and 29th. | ||
Adjourned | Adjourned | ||
| Line 53: | Line 56: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|colspan="4" |'''Actions''' ''(Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)''<br/> | |colspan="4" |'''Actions''' ''(Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)''<br/> | ||
| − | + | *Pat to talk to Paul regarding where the issue of referencing external materials originated | |
| + | *Rick to circle back with Ken regarding 3-year planning process | ||
|- | |- | ||
Latest revision as of 20:30, 11 June 2015
TSC Risk Assessment Committee (TRAC) Agenda/Minutes
back to TRAC page
Meeting Info/Attendees
| TRAC Meeting Minutes Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371# |
Date: Wednesday, 2015-06-10 Time: 10:00 AM U.S. Eastern | |
| Facilitator: Pat Van Dyke | Note taker(s): Lynn | |
| Quorum | n/a | ||||
| Chair/CTO | Members | Members | |||
| x | Pat Van Dyke | x | Rick Haddorff | Freida Hall | |
| Regrets | Austin Kreisler | Ken McCaslin | Regrets | Melva Peters | |
| John Quinn | John Roberts | ||||
Agenda
- Agenda review and approval - Pat Van Dyke
- Review minutes of 2015-05-27 TRAC
- Discussion Topics:
- Referencing External Materials/following ANSI rules (TSC to review TRAC assessment on 2015-06-29)
- Risks associated with current publishing practices
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
- Opened with discussion regarding the successful Paris meeting.
- Referencing external materials: do we have responsibility to validate? If our standards have to be approved by ANSI, are the references as vigorous as they are? Andy and Paul had done some work on this last fall. Reviewed documents sent by Andy. Should we come up with a process or policy to add to publication guide? If reference is in a normative part of balloted materials that are then the standard, you’re then forced to keep it up to date or understand if changes have been or will be made. If referring to an ISO standard in the informative part of the material, for example, there shouldn’t be a need to update that unless there is a new ballot or reaffirmation. If the referred-to standard is in the normative part of the balloted material, then the change must be tracked. Pat will talk to Paul regarding where this issue originated.
- 3-year planning: Rick states there hasn’t been much progress at this point but he will circle back with Ken this week. PSS is owned by TSC at this point. Pat suggests having some sit-down time with co-chairs to go over things at WGM.
- Will meet again the 17th but not the 24th. We will meet the 1st and the 8th of July, but not the 15th, 22nd, and 29th.
Adjourned
Next Steps
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
| |||
| Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
© 2014 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved
