Difference between revisions of "2014-01-08 TRAC"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with '__NOTOC__ ==TSC Risk Assessment Committee (TRAC) Agenda/Minutes == back to TRAC page ===Meeting Info/Attendees=== Category:2013 TSC Minutes {|border="1" cellpad…') |
|||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| ||Pat Van Dyke|| ||Rick Haddorff|| ||Melva Peters | | ||Pat Van Dyke|| ||Rick Haddorff|| ||Melva Peters | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | ||John Quinn || ||Austin Kreisler|| || Ken McCaslin | + | | ||John Quinn || ||Austin Kreisler|| regrets|| Ken McCaslin |
|- | |- |
Revision as of 17:15, 7 January 2014
TSC Risk Assessment Committee (TRAC) Agenda/Minutes
back to TRAC page
Meeting Info/Attendees
TRAC Meeting Minutes Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371# |
Date: Wednesday, 2014-01-08 Time: 10:00 AM U.S. Eastern | |
Facilitator: Pat Van Dyke | Note taker(s): Lynn |
Quorum | n/a | ||||
Chair/CTO | Members | Members | |||
Pat Van Dyke | Rick Haddorff | Melva Peters | |||
John Quinn | Austin Kreisler | regrets | Ken McCaslin | ||
Agenda
- Agenda review and approval - Pat Van Dyke
- Review minutes of 2013-12-18 TRAC
- Action Items:
- Review TSC feedback of Jan 6th meeting, from presentation of composite WGM metric. Also see outstanding questions below.
- Work on next metric bundling together other PBS metrics measures including the balloting in previous cycles, making the correct dates, etc.
- Discuss outreach to ballot evaluators on what additional ballot quality measures should be performed.
- Pat will work on developing a straw man for separate criteria for informative ballot reconciliation in 6 months, for example.
- Melva will re-review the T3F risks and give a first draft on impact and likelihood for review on the next call.
- Review risk spreadsheet
- CDA R3 vs CDA R2.1 and impact on US Realm and CCDA
- TSC referred action:
- WG Meeting metric: Having 2 of three would be healthy and not counted.agenda posting by 8 weeks post-WGM (same time as interim WGH), meeting room requests submitted on time. Meeting minutes posted by two weeks post-WGM. Outstanding questions:
- Minutes are currently counted based on any WG minutes including conference calls; do we want to trim this to specifically WGM minutes?
- Steering Divisions might also be measured on a their performance of this metric, or a rollup metric that measures how many of their component groups meet this composite metric. 0-60% red, 61-80% yellow, and 81-100% green. What about the TSC?
- WG Balloting metric: bundling together other PBS metrics measures including the balloting in previous cycles, making the correct dates, etc.
- Ballot quality assessment consideration as a governance point/work group health metric/strategic initiatives dashboard metric. Larger sample size, Other measures the TRAC might assess are % of negatives less than 20, or ballots not returned versus negative balloters. Might outreach to prior ballot evaluators to do the additional measures.
- WG Meeting metric: Having 2 of three would be healthy and not counted.agenda posting by 8 weeks post-WGM (same time as interim WGH), meeting room requests submitted on time. Meeting minutes posted by two weeks post-WGM. Outstanding questions:
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
Adjourned
Next Steps
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date) | |||
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
© 2014 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved