Difference between revisions of "2013-11-20 TRAC"

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 23: Line 23:
 
|colspan="2"|Chair/CTO ||colspan="2"|Members ||colspan="2"|Members  
 
|colspan="2"|Chair/CTO ||colspan="2"|Members ||colspan="2"|Members  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| ||Pat Van Dyke|| ||Rick Haddorff|| ||Melva Peters
+
| x||Pat Van Dyke||x ||Rick Haddorff|| x||Melva Peters
 
|-
 
|-
 
| ||John Quinn || regrets||Austin Kreisler|| || Ken McCaslin
 
| ||John Quinn || regrets||Austin Kreisler|| || Ken McCaslin
Line 48: Line 48:
 
===Minutes===
 
===Minutes===
  
−
'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/>
+
'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/> Convened 10:03 AM
−
 
+
*Agenda review and approval - Pat Van Dyke notes that we need to review the project scope statement deadline metrics as TSC reviewed them.
 +
*Review minutes of [[2013-11-06 TRAC]]
 +
*Action Items:
 +
** DAMs and IGs require conformance criteria (what is the right word… from the SAIF IG) - Austin; he feels he has done this and it will evolve out of the current work on defining what is a DAM and an IG.
 +
**Pat will work on developing a straw man for separate criteria for informative ballot reconciliation in 6 months, for example. No progress
 +
**Austin and Pat will address this with the incoming Board Chair a companion committee to perform risk assessment on proposed member benefits and provide risk assessment to Board along with membership benefit proposal. This was addressed with Chuck at 2013Sep WGM Saturday meeting. This is done.
 +
**Pat will check with Karen on options for locking down access to pre-publication materials without violating ANSI openness policies; she will still do this although options on the web site have been reviewed.
 +
**Melva will re-review the T3F risks and give a first draft on impact and likelihood for review on the next call.
 +
*CDA R3 vs CDA R2.1 and impact on US Realm and CCDA reviewed. This needs to be picked up as soon as ONC comes 'back to life', notes John.
 +
*TSC referred action: Raising the Bar - New Work Group Health metrics - Since the WGs have hit a perfect score on some of these metrics, we might consider new ones
 +
**Posting Agendas in advance of WGM
 +
**Submitting meeting room requests by the deadline.
 +
**TSC cautioned that if new metrics are added that others might be retired.
 +
*Updated [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/7688/11203/%43%6f%6e%73%6f%6c%69%64%61%74%65%64%52%69%73%6b%41%73%73%65%73%73%6d%65%6e%74%2e%78%6c%73%78 risk assessment spreadsheet]
 +
**Complexity of procedure discussed. Clarifications added.
 +
**Continue review of when the project approval should be completed including cosponsor agreement for answering question in 'metrics' for "Project scope statements for the current cycle are approved by sponsors and cosponsors by ?? Date."
  
 +
Adjourned 11:01 AM
  
−
Adjourned
+
*New updated [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/7689/11204/%43%6f%6e%73%6f%6c%69%64%61%74%65%64%52%69%73%6b%41%73%73%65%73%73%6d%65%6e%74%2e%78%6c%73%78 spreadsheet]
 +
  
 
===Next Steps===
 
===Next Steps===
Line 62: Line 79:
 
|-  
 
|-  
 
|colspan="4" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/>
 
|colspan="4" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/>
−
*<!--[[2013-11-20 TRAC]] -->meeting 11/27?
+
*[[2013-11-27 TRAC]], regrets from Melva and Lynn
−
 
+
 
|}
 
|}
 
© 2013 Health Level Seven® International.  All rights reserved
 
© 2013 Health Level Seven® International.  All rights reserved

Latest revision as of 16:11, 20 November 2013

TSC Risk Assessment Committee (TRAC) Agenda/Minutes

back to TRAC page

Meeting Info/Attendees

TRAC Meeting Minutes

Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371#
GoToMeeting ID: 660-939-197

Date: Wednesday, 2013-11-20
Time: 10:00 AM U.S. Eastern
Facilitator: Pat Van Dyke Note taker(s): Lynn
Quorum n/a
Chair/CTO Members Members
x Pat Van Dyke x Rick Haddorff x Melva Peters
John Quinn regrets Austin Kreisler Ken McCaslin

Agenda

  • Agenda review and approval - Pat Van Dyke
  • Review minutes of 2013-11-06 TRAC
  • Action Items:
    • DAMs and IGs require conformance criteria (what is the right word… from the SAIF IG) - Austin
    • Pat will work on developing a straw man for separate criteria for informative ballot reconciliation in 6 months, for example.
    • Austin and Pat will address this with the incoming Board Chair a companion committee to perform risk assessment on proposed member benefits and provide risk assessment to Board along with membership benefit proposal.
    • Pat will check with Karen on options for locking down access to pre-publication materials without violating ANSI openness policies
    • Melva will re-review the T3F risks and give a first draft on impact and likelihood for review on the next call.
  • CDA R3 vs CDA R2.1 and impact on US Realm and CCDA reviewed. This needs to be picked up as soon as ONC comes 'back to life', notes John.
  • TSC referred action: Raising the Bar - New Work Group Health metrics - Since the WGs have hit a perfect score on some of these metrics, we might consider new ones
    • Posting Agendas in advance of WGM
    • Submitting meeting room requests by the deadline.
  • Updated risk assessment spreadsheet

Minutes

Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
Convened 10:03 AM

  • Agenda review and approval - Pat Van Dyke notes that we need to review the project scope statement deadline metrics as TSC reviewed them.
  • Review minutes of 2013-11-06 TRAC
  • Action Items:
    • DAMs and IGs require conformance criteria (what is the right word… from the SAIF IG) - Austin; he feels he has done this and it will evolve out of the current work on defining what is a DAM and an IG.
    • Pat will work on developing a straw man for separate criteria for informative ballot reconciliation in 6 months, for example. No progress
    • Austin and Pat will address this with the incoming Board Chair a companion committee to perform risk assessment on proposed member benefits and provide risk assessment to Board along with membership benefit proposal. This was addressed with Chuck at 2013Sep WGM Saturday meeting. This is done.
    • Pat will check with Karen on options for locking down access to pre-publication materials without violating ANSI openness policies; she will still do this although options on the web site have been reviewed.
    • Melva will re-review the T3F risks and give a first draft on impact and likelihood for review on the next call.
  • CDA R3 vs CDA R2.1 and impact on US Realm and CCDA reviewed. This needs to be picked up as soon as ONC comes 'back to life', notes John.
  • TSC referred action: Raising the Bar - New Work Group Health metrics - Since the WGs have hit a perfect score on some of these metrics, we might consider new ones
    • Posting Agendas in advance of WGM
    • Submitting meeting room requests by the deadline.
    • TSC cautioned that if new metrics are added that others might be retired.
  • Updated risk assessment spreadsheet
    • Complexity of procedure discussed. Clarifications added.
    • Continue review of when the project approval should be completed including cosponsor agreement for answering question in 'metrics' for "Project scope statements for the current cycle are approved by sponsors and cosponsors by ?? Date."

Adjourned 11:01 AM


Next Steps

Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)


Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items

© 2013 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved

Retrieved from "https://tscwiki.hl7.org/w/index.php?title=2013-11-20_TRAC&oldid=12564"