View source for Project Scope-Care Plan project update

Return to [[Domain Experts Electronic Voting Summaries]]

Please vote on the project scope update for the Care Plan project from Patient Care. Enter your name and Work Group along with your vote. Only one vote per Work Group please. Any comments added through the poll should also be distributed to the DESD list server. 

Link to document: http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/desd/scmsvn/?action=browse&path=%2F%2Acheckout%2A%2Ftrunk%2FDocuments%2FProjectScopeStatements%2FHL7ProjectScopeStatementCarePlan.doc&revision=8386

*Summary - Passed (7/0/3/4)
**Number of participants: 10
**Most popular option:  Affirmative
**Votes in favor: 7
**Comments: 4

3/15/10 3:36:00 PM CET · Austin Kreisler · Poll added by "Austin Kreisler"
Options:

3/15/10 3:37:04 PM CET · Austin Kreisler · Poll changed by "Austin Kreisler"
Options:
Abstain
Affirmative
Negative

*History: DESD Project Scope: Care Plan project update
**3/15/10 3:57:37 PM CET · William Goossen PC · Participant "William Goossen PC" added OK: Affirmative
**3/15/10 4:51:19 PM CET · Alan Nicol (Gas) · Participant "Alan Nicol (Gas)" added OK: Abstain
**3/15/10 5:03:39 PM CET · Melvin Reynolds (DEV) · Participant "Melvin Reynolds (DEV)" added OK: Abstain
**3/15/10 5:04:33 PM CET · Melvin Reynolds · Comment by "Melvin Reynolds" added 
**3/16/10 2:34:16 PM CET · Ed Tripp (RCRIM) · Participant "Ed Tripp (RCRIM)" added OK: Affirmative
**3/23/10 2:39:52 PM CET · David Hamill · Comment by "David Hamill" added
**3/23/10 2:40:09 PM CET · David Hamill (PMO) · Participant "David Hamill (PMO)" added OK: Abstain
**3/23/10 2:45:49 PM CET · David Hamill (PMO) · Participant "David Hamill (PMO)" deleted
***Note - Removed by Austin Kreisler, PMO does not have a DESD vote. Comments were retained
**3/23/10 2:54:51 PM CET · David Hamill · Comment by "David Hamill" added
**3/29/10 6:18:41 PM CEST · Mead Walker (Patient Safety · Participant "Mead Walker (Patient Safety" added OK: Affirmative
**3/30/10 9:18:21 AM CEST · Helmut Koenig (II) · Participant "Helmut Koenig (II)" added OK: Abstain
**3/31/10 12:50:47 AM CEST · Rita Altamore (PHER) · Participant "Rita Altamore (PHER)" added
**3/31/10 12:51:05 AM CEST · Rita Altamore (PHER) · Participant "Rita Altamore (PHER)" changed OK: Affirmative
**3/31/10 12:56:45 AM CEST · Rita Altamore (PHER) · Comment by "Rita Altamore (PHER)" added
**4/3/10 8:14:13 AM CEST · Steve Bentley (CIC) · Participant "Steve Bentley (CIC)" added OK: Affirmative
**4/5/10 2:27:31 PM CEST · Austin Kreisler (DESD) · Participant "Austin Kreisler (DESD)" added OK: Affirmative
**4/5/10 10:41:03 PM CEST · Joy Kuhl (Child Health) · Participant "Joy Kuhl (Child Health)" added OK: Affirmative
**4/5/10 11:05:28 PM CEST · Austin Kreisler · Poll closed by "Austin Kreisler"

*Comments:
**Rita Altamore (PHER) March 30, 2010 6:56:45 PM EDT PHER is wondering whether the intent of the new project is to use CDA for Care Plan, and if so, whether that is really a "continuation", given that the old Care Plan material is not CDA...?
**David Hamill March 23, 2010 9:54:51 AM EDT Project #651 has been created in Project Insight to replace project #105.
**David Hamill March 23, 2010 9:39:52 AM EDT Just using this forum as a means to comment on my review of the scope statement. From a PMO view, I'd like to close out the original project #105 and open a new one for this scope statement, with it referencing #105. #105 is from Sept. 2006, and it only contains the scope statement information. This new scope statement is much more relevant for the work going forward.
**Melvin Reynolds March 15, 2010 12:04:33 PM EDT DEV comment on basis of ignorance of the topic