Difference between revisions of "TSC SWOT and three year plan"

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: This is a strawman produced by Charlie McCay, and has not been reviewed by the TSC or others *Strengths ** Respected membership ** committed membership ** Support from board, HQ, and work...)
 
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
This is a strawman produced by Charlie McCay, and has not been reviewed by the TSC or others
+
This is a strawman produced by Charlie McCay and reviewed by John Quinn, and yet to be reviewed by the TSC or others
  
 
*Strengths
 
*Strengths
 
** Respected membership
 
** Respected membership
** committed membership
+
** Committed membership
** Support from board, HQ, and work group members
+
** Support from board, HQ, and Work Group members
 +
** Responsive
  
 
*Weakness
 
*Weakness
 
** Limited time
 
** Limited time
** lack of "intermeeting" work
+
** Limited control over resources
** Limited technical support
 
  
 
*Opportunities
 
*Opportunities
** linkage with roadmap
+
** Linkage with roadmap
 +
** Establish and drive Product Strategy
  
 
*Threats
 
*Threats
 
** Loss of initial momentum
 
** Loss of initial momentum
** creating overheads without visible return
+
** Creating overheads without visible return
** alienate key thought leaders
+
** Alienate key thought leaders
  
 
== 3 year plan ==
 
== 3 year plan ==
 
* Full linkage between Work Group Plans and Strategic Plan
 
* Full linkage between Work Group Plans and Strategic Plan
* Metrics for good Work Groups, Projects, Products
 
 
* Continuous improvement plan
 
* Continuous improvement plan
 
* Communications plan
 
* Communications plan
 +
*Collaborate with CTO to develop and deploy an HL7 Quality Plan

Latest revision as of 14:46, 12 February 2010

This is a strawman produced by Charlie McCay and reviewed by John Quinn, and yet to be reviewed by the TSC or others

  • Strengths
    • Respected membership
    • Committed membership
    • Support from board, HQ, and Work Group members
    • Responsive
  • Weakness
    • Limited time
    • Limited control over resources
  • Opportunities
    • Linkage with roadmap
    • Establish and drive Product Strategy
  • Threats
    • Loss of initial momentum
    • Creating overheads without visible return
    • Alienate key thought leaders

3 year plan

  • Full linkage between Work Group Plans and Strategic Plan
  • Continuous improvement plan
  • Communications plan
  • Collaborate with CTO to develop and deploy an HL7 Quality Plan