Difference between revisions of "TSC Agenda item list"

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(15 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
* Proposal from McCaslin on co-chair elections for TSC appointed committees (scheduled for June 16)
+
*By what mechanism/how does HL7 produce white papers? (from 20090922 Tuesday lunch discussion)
−
* Discuss TSC's role in approving MOUs (not currently scheduled but suggested by Hammond)
+
 
−
* Clean up of project list to be completed by Board retreat
+
*Tooling - what change the working group will see and when, and what does the TSC need to do (See [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=323&group_id=52&atid=313 TSC Tracker # 323] and [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=588&group_id=52&atid=313TSC Tracker # 588])
−
* Beebe to provide recommendation on whether profiles should be normative or informative.
+
 
−
* Meyer to update policy on modifications to mission/charter statements
+
*Formalization in DMPs of method and process used for e-voting.
−
* Van Hentenryck to document process for appealing ballot process (opening ballot pools, being added to closed ballot pools, etc)
+
* Questions for the Advisory Committee (AC) - prior to their conference calls.  Examples:
−
* TSC members to review document naming file
+
**It would be useful to get a better idea of what the Advisory Council picture when they ready the roadmap strategies, and so I would like to hear one or more examples of SMART objectives for each of the strategies, or other quantifiable measures that they they would recommend as indicators that we are delivering successfully against each of the strategies. <br/>It may be that this is something that the roadmap taskforce should be doing -- but I think that this would be a good way to obtain a better understanding of what those outside HL7 would see as successful delivery
−
* Request for publication of the PHM DSTU.
+
**What information about HL7 projects, products and workgroups do they need to be able to more effectively generate unsolicited advice to HL7? Are there examples of how other organisations work with advisory councils, and the sort of information that is available and reviewed?
−
* Proposal to have the process on the TSC webpage (and maybe in the GOM) regarding request for publication of DSTU updated so that it is clear how "with the concurrence of the TSC" means in practice. (Added 11/12/2008 per McKay, Liora Alschuler)
+
**For each of the questions that HL7 asks the advisory council, what briefing information would it be useful to have about projects, products and workgroups? 
 +
**Once the advisory council is working on a question, how can HL7 ensure that they have the relevant information about HL7 projects, products and workgroups?
 +
**How do we better ensure that we are collecting and publishing information about projects, products and workgroups that is useful and used by the Advisory council and others, and how do we get feedback to those providing the information?
 +
*What categories or hierarchy does the TSC wish to see in the product list?  Need guidance for updates to the Project Scope Statement and display on the website  [[User:Llaakso|LynnL]] 16:34, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 +
*FUTURE AGENDA ITEM: Look at a revision at an upcoming conference call of the CTO side, not necessarily the TSC side (2010MayWGM) from [[2010-05-15_TSC_WGM_Agenda]]

Latest revision as of 15:09, 25 May 2010

  • By what mechanism/how does HL7 produce white papers? (from 20090922 Tuesday lunch discussion)
  • Formalization in DMPs of method and process used for e-voting.
  • Questions for the Advisory Committee (AC) - prior to their conference calls. Examples:
    • It would be useful to get a better idea of what the Advisory Council picture when they ready the roadmap strategies, and so I would like to hear one or more examples of SMART objectives for each of the strategies, or other quantifiable measures that they they would recommend as indicators that we are delivering successfully against each of the strategies.
      It may be that this is something that the roadmap taskforce should be doing -- but I think that this would be a good way to obtain a better understanding of what those outside HL7 would see as successful delivery
    • What information about HL7 projects, products and workgroups do they need to be able to more effectively generate unsolicited advice to HL7? Are there examples of how other organisations work with advisory councils, and the sort of information that is available and reviewed?
    • For each of the questions that HL7 asks the advisory council, what briefing information would it be useful to have about projects, products and workgroups?
    • Once the advisory council is working on a question, how can HL7 ensure that they have the relevant information about HL7 projects, products and workgroups?
    • How do we better ensure that we are collecting and publishing information about projects, products and workgroups that is useful and used by the Advisory council and others, and how do we get feedback to those providing the information?
  • What categories or hierarchy does the TSC wish to see in the product list? Need guidance for updates to the Project Scope Statement and display on the website LynnL 16:34, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
  • FUTURE AGENDA ITEM: Look at a revision at an upcoming conference call of the CTO side, not necessarily the TSC side (2010MayWGM) from 2010-05-15_TSC_WGM_Agenda
Retrieved from "https://tscwiki.hl7.org/w/index.php?title=TSC_Agenda_item_list&oldid=6441"