Patient Care Mission and Charter Update

From HL7 TSC
Revision as of 18:05, 1 February 2010 by Austin kreisler (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Return to Domain Experts Electronic Voting Summaries

Please vote on the updated Mission and Charter statement from the Patient Care work group. Enter your name and Work Group along with your vote. Only one vote per Work Group please. Any comments added through the poll should also be distributed to the DESD list server.

Link to document: ScopestatementPatientCare.doc

  • Summary - Passed (9/1/0/3)
    • Number of participants: 10
    • Most popular option: Affirmative
    • Votes in favor: 9
    • Comments: 3
  • History: DESD: Mission & Charter Update from Patient Care
    • 10/6/09 4:23:31 PM CEST · Austin Kreisler · Poll added by "Austin Kreisler"
      • Options:
      • Abstain
      • Affirmative
      • Negative
    • 10/6/09 5:55:21 PM CEST · Edward Tripp · Comment by "Edward Tripp" added
    • 10/7/09 7:13:34 AM CEST · William Goossen (PC) · Participant "William Goossen (PC)" added
      • OK: Affirmative
    • 10/7/09 3:13:25 PM CEST · Joy Kuhl (Child Health) · Participant "Joy Kuhl (Child Health)" added
      • OK: Affirmative
    • 10/7/09 9:33:32 PM CEST · Rita Altamore (PHER) · Participant "Rita Altamore (PHER)" added
      • OK: Affirmative
    • 10/7/09 9:34:35 PM CEST · Rita Altamore (PHER) · Comment by "Rita Altamore (PHER)" added
    • 10/9/09 10:06:23 AM CEST · Helmut Koenig (II) · Participant "Helmut Koenig (II)" added
      • OK: Affirmative
    • 10/17/09 4:46:39 PM CEST · melvin reynolds (dev) · Participant "melvin reynolds (dev)" added
      • OK: Affirmative
    • 10/17/09 4:55:01 PM CEST · Melvin Reynolds · Comment by "Melvin Reynolds" added
    • 10/30/09 9:03:17 PM CET · Suzanne Gonzales-Webb (CBCC) · Participant "Suzanne Gonzales-Webb (CBCC)" added
      • OK: Affirmative
    • 11/2/09 11:20:02 PM CET · Ian Townend (PC) · Participant "Ian Townend (PC)" added
      • OK: Affirmative
    • 11/16/09 4:22:15 PM CET · William Goossen (PC) · Participant "William Goossen (PC)" deleted
    • 11/16/09 4:23:14 PM CET · Austin Kreisler (DESD) · Participant "Austin Kreisler (DESD)" added
      • OK: Affirmative
    • 11/16/09 5:22:37 PM CET · Lise Stevens (Patient Safety) · Participant "Lise Stevens (Patient Safety)" added
      • OK: Affirmative
    • 11/16/09 5:45:10 PM CET · Ed Tripp (RCRIM) · Participant "Ed Tripp (RCRIM)" added
      • OK: Negative
    • 11/17/09 4:57:41 AM CET · Nancy Orvis (GOVT) · Participant "Nancy Orvis (GOVT)" added
      • OK: Affirmative
    • 1/6/10 4:52:20 PM CET · Austin Kreisler · Poll closed by "Austin Kreisler"
  • Comments
    • Melvin Reynolds Saturday, October 17, 2009 2:55:01 AM GMT-12:00 Voting positive because it seems to say the right things - and more besides ;) We note that the list of internal relationships is long, but still does fully reflect reality, and therefore question the value of such listings for groups that are by their nature horizontal in their relationships.
    • Rita Altamore (PHER) Wednesday, October 7, 2009 7:34:35 AM GMT-12:00 The current format differs from the M&C template, but the required content appears to be present. PHER has voted affirmative but suggests closer adherence to the template.
    • Edward Tripp Tuesday, October 6, 2009 3:55:21 AM GMT-12:00 This document does not follow the structure and content outlined in the Work Group Mission and Charter guidelines found on the HL7 website under templates. Ed