Difference between revisions of "FTSD-F2F-20101004"

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 17: Line 17:
  
 
==Attendees==
 
==Attendees==
+
Mead Walker, Paul Knapp, Charlie McCay, Bernd Blobel, Mike Davis, Dale Nelso, Melva Peters, Robert Snelick, Ted Klein, Heather Grain, Frank Oemig, Tony Julian, Sandy Stuart, Ann Wrightson, Ken Rubin, Rene Spronk, Lynn Laakso
 +
 
 
==Proposed Agenda==
 
==Proposed Agenda==
 
*Approve [[FTSD-ConCall-20100907| Sept 7 Minutes]], [[FTSD-ConCall-20100921| Sept 21 Minutes]] & Accept Agenda
 
*Approve [[FTSD-ConCall-20100907| Sept 7 Minutes]], [[FTSD-ConCall-20100921| Sept 21 Minutes]] & Accept Agenda

Revision as of 20:55, 12 October 2010

Foundation & Technology SD - Face-to-Face October 4, 2010

Meeting Information

Meeting at Plenary and WGM in Cambridge -- 7:00-8:30 PM
Room: TBD

Members:

  • Implementable Technology Specifications (ITS)
  • Implementation/Conformance (IC)
  • Infrastructure & Messaging (InM)
  • RIM-Based Application Architecture (RIMBAA)
  • Modeling & Methodology (MnM)
  • Security
  • Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)
  • Templates
  • Vocabulary (Vocab)

Attendees

Mead Walker, Paul Knapp, Charlie McCay, Bernd Blobel, Mike Davis, Dale Nelso, Melva Peters, Robert Snelick, Ted Klein, Heather Grain, Frank Oemig, Tony Julian, Sandy Stuart, Ann Wrightson, Ken Rubin, Rene Spronk, Lynn Laakso

Proposed Agenda

"the FTSD should weigh in on what the disposition of this artifact has been and should be. The initial TSC feedback on the cookbook was to wait and see what a prototypical analysis and assessment before determining what the recommendation would be for its use by all Work Groups."
Note that the project has scheduled a tutorial on Security and Risk Analysis at the WGM on Thursday morning.
  • Discussion of the Challenges of Addressing the MANY projects that WG's face
  • The Neutral Mapping Project - Its Status and the Means for Getting Multi-WG Involvement
  • Approval of RIMBAA project 550 which has been ongoing since September 2009 [on the assumption that it had gone through the approval process, which apparently isn't the case].
  • New Business

Adjournment

Back to Meetings