Difference between revisions of "FTSD-ConCalls-20100201"

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
=FTSD - Foundation & Technology Steering Division=  
+
= Foundation Steering Call: 2/2/10 =
 
+
==Attendance ==
==Conference Call February 1, 2010[[Foundation_%26_Technology_Meetings| Meeting Information]]==
+
*Mead Walker
:'''Conference Call''' is scheduled for '''0.5 hour'''
+
*Frank Oemig
::'''12:00 PM''' (consult [http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock for local times])
+
*Woody Beeler
:'''''HL7 Conference Call Service'''''
+
*Paul Knapp
::Phone Number: +1 770-657-9270 (Passcode: 943627)
+
*Ron Parker
:'''''Online Meeting Service''''' - GoToMeeting
 
::[https://www2.gotomeeting.com/join/385800034 https://www2.gotomeeting.com/join/385800034] (GoToMeeting ID: 385-800-034)
 
 
 
Members:
 
*Implementable Technology Specifications (ITS)
 
*Implementation/Conformance
 
*Infrastructure & Messaging (InM)
 
*RIM-Based Application Architecture (RIMBAA)
 
*Modeling & Methodology (MnM)
 
*Security
 
*Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)
 
*Templates
 
*Vocabulary
 
 
 
==Attendees==
 
 
 
 
==Agenda==
 
==Agenda==
#''(05 min)'' Roll Call
+
*Review minutes
#''(02 min)'' Approve Minutes of:
+
*Two scope proposals
#*[[FTSD-F2F-20100118|January 18, 2010 (face-to-face)]], and
+
*Review schedule for calls
#*[[FTSD-ConCalls-20100125|January 25, 2010 (ConCall)]]
+
*ARB informational report
#''(10 min)'' '''Project Proposal: [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/1421/6861/HL7ProjectScopeStatementVocabualryStandardsGlossary.doc Health Informatics Harmonised Glossary (JIC project)]'''
+
*An ITS report
#:Submitted by Vocabulary Work Group
+
==Minutes==
#''(10 min)'' '''Project Proposal: [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/1422/6862/HL7ProjectScopeStatementvocab_Binding_syntaxv1.doc "Syntax for Vocabulary Binding in Implementation Guides"]'''
+
Accept minutes from face to face meeting – moved, passed (no comments)
#:Submitted by Implementation/Conformance Work Group
+
Accept minutes from last week – moved, passed (no comments)
#''(5 min)'' '''Future Conference Call Schedules (change "starting week")'''
+
==ARB Information Report==
#:See [[FTSD-ConCalls-20100125|January 25 minutes]]
+
ARB is working on defining its review process for the next round of deliverables.  The content will be on an accessible website in about two weeks.  They have a requirement that review be targeted.  The key deliverables will be: behavioral framework, overview, conformance, governance.  Woody suggests that behavioral framework is of interest to all framework WGs and the key functional committees: OO and PA. The ARB is trying to identify a core group that has to respond, but is open to all who have an interest. We suggest a range of committees that are truly core here, but do want the process to be open to all.
#''(0 min)'' '''Other Business'''
+
==ITS==
 
+
Will have a scope statement for a RIM based ITS project – will be reviewed by the committee this afternoon.  They plan to be in the May ballot, at some level. There are also potential implementers coming forward. Frank notes the importance of an ITS drawing element names from RIM classes and class codes.
===[[FTSD Agenda item list|Agenda items]]===
+
==Two scope proposals==
===[[FTSD Action item list|Action Item List]]===
+
===Vocabulary Glossary project===
 +
Publishing does not see any other party managing the HL7 glossary.  There is no process for accepting content.  It is not clear to Woody why this is a vocabulary project, however a key party is a Vocab co-chair.  He does suggest that Publishing be added as a co-sponsor, and that the project be forwarded to the division Publishing is in.  Also, the project scope section seems too summary: What will be done in HL7?  What are the deliverables within HL7?
 +
===Syntax for Vocabulary Binding===
 +
Suggest that M&M be added as a co-sponsor – this is fine with Frank.  Mead notes that this is an area where continued work between Vocabulary and M&M is needed.  We add a scope statement by moving text from the intent section.  We add M&M as a co-sponsor. 
 +
Approval by the steering division: Moved, seconded, passed.
 +
===Future Conference Calls===
 +
We agree to go onto the alternate cycle to support Ken Rubin.  The next call will be on Feb 9 and every two weeks following.  Woody will update the conference call service.
  
 
[[Foundation_%26_Technology_Meeting_Minutes_and_Agendas|Back to Meetings]]
 
[[Foundation_%26_Technology_Meeting_Minutes_and_Agendas|Back to Meetings]]

Revision as of 16:53, 3 February 2010

Foundation Steering Call: 2/2/10

Attendance

  • Mead Walker
  • Frank Oemig
  • Woody Beeler
  • Paul Knapp
  • Ron Parker

Agenda

  • Review minutes
  • Two scope proposals
  • Review schedule for calls
  • ARB informational report
  • An ITS report

Minutes

Accept minutes from face to face meeting – moved, passed (no comments) Accept minutes from last week – moved, passed (no comments)

ARB Information Report

ARB is working on defining its review process for the next round of deliverables. The content will be on an accessible website in about two weeks. They have a requirement that review be targeted. The key deliverables will be: behavioral framework, overview, conformance, governance. Woody suggests that behavioral framework is of interest to all framework WGs and the key functional committees: OO and PA. The ARB is trying to identify a core group that has to respond, but is open to all who have an interest. We suggest a range of committees that are truly core here, but do want the process to be open to all.

ITS

Will have a scope statement for a RIM based ITS project – will be reviewed by the committee this afternoon. They plan to be in the May ballot, at some level. There are also potential implementers coming forward. Frank notes the importance of an ITS drawing element names from RIM classes and class codes.

Two scope proposals

Vocabulary Glossary project

Publishing does not see any other party managing the HL7 glossary. There is no process for accepting content. It is not clear to Woody why this is a vocabulary project, however a key party is a Vocab co-chair. He does suggest that Publishing be added as a co-sponsor, and that the project be forwarded to the division Publishing is in. Also, the project scope section seems too summary: What will be done in HL7? What are the deliverables within HL7?

Syntax for Vocabulary Binding

Suggest that M&M be added as a co-sponsor – this is fine with Frank. Mead notes that this is an area where continued work between Vocabulary and M&M is needed. We add a scope statement by moving text from the intent section. We add M&M as a co-sponsor. Approval by the steering division: Moved, seconded, passed.

Future Conference Calls

We agree to go onto the alternate cycle to support Ken Rubin. The next call will be on Feb 9 and every two weeks following. Woody will update the conference call service.

Back to Meetings