Difference between revisions of "DESD PSS: PHER WG - Cancer Registry CDA Implementation Guide"

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Return to Domain Experts Electronic Voting Summaries Please vote on the PSS for the PHER WG. Enter your name and WG along with your vote. 1 vote per WG. Poll open until J...")
 
 
Line 45: Line 45:
  
 
===Comments===
 
===Comments===
* None
+
* Received by email June 17, 2014 - from Mollie Ullman-Cullere (Clinical Genomics): CG's voted negative, because the requirements include genetic test results.  CG would like to be included as a co-sponsor for the genetic results portion.  We sent an email to key persons on the project and have not gotten a response.
 +
* Received by email June 28, 2014 - from Wendy Scharber:  Please note that Clinical Genomics is requesting inclusion as an Interested Party.  They decided against being a co-sponsor.
  
 
===Work Group Health and PBS Metrics Review===
 
===Work Group Health and PBS Metrics Review===
 
*Work Group Health: Green
 
*Work Group Health: Green
 
*Review of PBS Metrics: RED
 
*Review of PBS Metrics: RED

Latest revision as of 16:10, 7 July 2014

Return to Domain Experts Electronic Voting Summaries

Please vote on the PSS for the PHER WG. Enter your name and WG along with your vote. 1 vote per WG. Poll open until July 2, 2014.

Link to PSS: Cancer Registry CDA IGuide PSS

Link to Updated PSS: Cancer Registry CDA IGuide PSS Updated

Link to Doodle Poll: Doodle Poll Link

Summary

  • Number of participants: 8
  • Most popular option: Affirmative
  • Votes in favor: 7
  • Comments: 0
  • Non-participating work groups counted as abstaining solely for the purpose of counting quorum:

Vote

' Affirmative Negative (with comment) Abstain
Elaine Ayres (Patient Care) OK
John Rhoads (HCD/DEV) OK
Edward Helton BRIDG OK
Ken Pool (PHER) OK
Craig Gabron (AWG) OK
John Walsh (Anesthesia) OK
Mollie Ullman (CG) OK
Melva Peters (Pharmacy) OK
Count 7 1 0

Comments

  • Received by email June 17, 2014 - from Mollie Ullman-Cullere (Clinical Genomics): CG's voted negative, because the requirements include genetic test results. CG would like to be included as a co-sponsor for the genetic results portion. We sent an email to key persons on the project and have not gotten a response.
  • Received by email June 28, 2014 - from Wendy Scharber: Please note that Clinical Genomics is requesting inclusion as an Interested Party. They decided against being a co-sponsor.

Work Group Health and PBS Metrics Review

  • Work Group Health: Green
  • Review of PBS Metrics: RED