DESD PSS: PHER Mission and Charter

From HL7 TSC
Revision as of 19:34, 1 February 2017 by Melva Peters1 (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Return to Domain Experts Electronic Voting Summaries

Please vote on the Mission and Charter for the PHER WG. Enter your name and WG along with your vote. 1 vote per WG. Poll open until January 14, 2017.

  • Link to M&C


  • Summary -
    • Number of participants: 12
    • Most popular option: Affirmative
    • Votes in favor: 12
    • Comments: 0
    • Non-participating work groups counted as abstaining solely for the purpose of counting quorum

Vote and Comments

' Affirmative Negative (with comments) Abstain
John Kiser (RCRIM) OK
Craig Newman (PHER) OK
Laura Heermann (PC) OK
Scott Robertson (Pharm) OK
John Walsh (Anesth) OK
Russ Leftwich (LHS) OK
James McClay (ECWG) OK
Floyd Eisenberg (CQI) NEG
Craig Gabron (AWG) OK
Ed Helton (BRIDG) OK
Bob Milius (Clinical Genomics) OK
David Pyke (CBCC) OK
Mitra Rocca (CIC) OK
Comment Per HL7 Mission and Charter guidelines: • Formal Relationships with Other HL7 Groups: This section specifies the relationships the WG has established with other HL7 groups, usually in the form of a listing of project collaborators on an HL7 Project Scope Statement. As formal collaborations change over time, these should be noted in the annual review of the WG M&C statement. Based on this guidance we won't list CQI as a formal relationship as we don't currently have a live project with them.
Craig Newman
Comment There is an extraneous "y" left from deleting "Patient Safety." Concur with Russ on Floyd's addition of CQI, and that the addition should not require a re-vote (assuming the addition is made)
04/01/17 3:42 PM Scott Robertson
Comment Nowhere in this document is PHER defined
04/01/17 12:00 PM David Pyke
Comment I support Floyd's recommendation/edit, but I think this is an addition that can be made without revoting
03/01/17 9:42 AM Russ Leftwich
Comment The Formal Relationships should include Clinical Quality Information - there is significant overlap between the needs for quality and value based reporting and the information required for Public Health. A more formal relationship would help avoid conflicting requests for information from providers
03/01/17 8:50 AM Floyd Eisenberg