DESD PSS: CBCC WG - Patient Friendly Security and Privacy Language

Please vote on the PSS for the CBCC WG. Enter your name and WG along with your vote. 1 vote per WG. Poll open until July 9 , 2014.

Link to PSS - UPDATED BASED ON COMMENTS UPDATED PSS

Comments	'

Suzanne Gonzales-Webb Tuesday, July 8, 2014	@ Mollie Ullman, please note that this PSS is more narrowly focused on the Security and Privacy language in Consent directives.

Suzanne Gonzales-Webb Tuesday, July 8, 2014	@ Mollie Ullman; We will be happy to add you as an Other Interessted Party

Suzanne Gonzales-Webb Tuesday, July 8, 2014	@ Scott FHIR project management will be led by John Moehrke from Security and/or Paul Knapp

Scott Robertson Monday, June 30, 2014	Pharmacy WG doesn't oppose the PSS, however there appear to be some process issues to resolve. e.g., Vocab facilitor, FHIR project management

Jean Duteau (PC) Sunday, June 22, 2014	We fail to see how the Consent Directive FHIR resource is part of the success criteria given that there is no mention of FHIR work in the project scope. As well, we thought all FHIR resource work had to go through the FMG and there is a separate project form for those.

Mollie Ullman (CG) Wednesday, June 18, 2014	Project scope includes Family History. Clinical Genomics Work Group would like to be listed as Other Interested Party specifically in regards to Family History.

Suzanne Gonzales-Webb Wednesday, June 18, 2014	@Floyd Agreed. both Publishing and Vocabulary Facilitators should have 'TBD' in the space. (Nice catch)

Floyd Eisenberg Wednesday, June 18, 2014	I don't think a vocabulary related PSS should be approved without an identified Vocabulary facilitator. The Vocabulary Work Group should have the ability to have significant input here.

Contents