Difference between revisions of "DESD PSS: CBCC WG - Patient Friendly Security and Privacy Language"

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
Link to PSS
 
Link to PSS
[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/desd/scmsvn/?action=browse&path=%2Ftrunk%2FDocuments%2FProjectScopeStatements%2F2014%2FProject_Scope_Statement_Patient-friendly%2520Security%2520and%2520Privacy%2520language%2520v%25203%252051.docx&sortby=date&view=log]
+
[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/desd/scmsvn/?action=browse&path=%2Ftrunk%2FDocuments%2FProjectScopeStatements%2F2014%2FProject_Scope_Statement_Patient-friendly%2520Security%2520and%2520Privacy%2520language%2520v%25203%252051.docx&sortby=date&view=log ORIGINAL PSS]
  
 
Link to PSS - UPDATED BASED ON COMMENTS
 
Link to PSS - UPDATED BASED ON COMMENTS
[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/desd/scmsvn/?action=browse&path=%2Ftrunk%2FDocuments%2FProjectScopeStatements%2F2014%2FProject_Scope_Statement_Patient-friendly%2520Security%2520and%2520Privacy%2520language%2520v%25203%252052.docx&sortby=date&view=log]
+
[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/desd/scmsvn/?action=browse&path=%2Ftrunk%2FDocuments%2FProjectScopeStatements%2F2014%2FProject_Scope_Statement_Patient-friendly%2520Security%2520and%2520Privacy%2520language%2520v%25203%252052.docx&sortby=date&view=log UPDATED PSS]
  
 
===Summary===
 
===Summary===

Latest revision as of 19:47, 21 August 2014

Return to Domain Experts Electronic Voting Summaries

Please vote on the PSS for the CBCC WG. Enter your name and WG along with your vote. 1 vote per WG. Poll open until July 9 , 2014.

Link to PSS ORIGINAL PSS

Link to PSS - UPDATED BASED ON COMMENTS UPDATED PSS

Summary

  • Number of participants: 11
  • Most popular option: Affirmative
  • Votes in favor: 5
  • Comments: 8
  • Non-participating work groups counted as abstaining solely for the purpose of counting quorum:

Vote

' Affirmative Negative (with comments) Abstain
Floyd Eisenberg OK
Rob Savage (PHER) OK
Suzanne Gonzales-Webb (CBCC) OK
Mollie Ullman (CG) OK
John Walsh (Anesthesia) OK
Jean Duteau (PC) OK
Laura H Langford (EC) OK
Scott Robertson (Pharm) OK
John Rhoads (DEV) OK
Dianne Reeves (CIC) OK
Diana Proud-Madruga OK
Count 5 3 3

Comments

Comments '
Suzanne Gonzales-Webb Tuesday, July 8, 2014 @ Mollie Ullman, please note that this PSS is more narrowly focused on the Security and Privacy language in Consent directives.
Suzanne Gonzales-Webb Tuesday, July 8, 2014 @ Mollie Ullman; We will be happy to add you as an Other Interessted Party
Suzanne Gonzales-Webb Tuesday, July 8, 2014 @ Scott FHIR project management will be led by John Moehrke from Security and/or Paul Knapp
Scott Robertson Monday, June 30, 2014 Pharmacy WG doesn't oppose the PSS, however there appear to be some process issues to resolve. e.g., Vocab facilitor, FHIR project management
Jean Duteau (PC) Sunday, June 22, 2014 We fail to see how the Consent Directive FHIR resource is part of the success criteria given that there is no mention of FHIR work in the project scope. As well, we thought all FHIR resource work had to go through the FMG and there is a separate project form for those.
Mollie Ullman (CG) Wednesday, June 18, 2014 Project scope includes Family History. Clinical Genomics Work Group would like to be listed as Other Interested Party specifically in regards to Family History.
Suzanne Gonzales-Webb Wednesday, June 18, 2014 @Floyd Agreed. both Publishing and Vocabulary Facilitators should have 'TBD' in the space. (Nice catch)
Floyd Eisenberg Wednesday, June 18, 2014 I don't think a vocabulary related PSS should be approved without an identified Vocabulary facilitator. The Vocabulary Work Group should have the ability to have significant input here.

Work Group Health and PBS Metrics Review

  • Work Group Health: Yellow
  • Review of PBS Metrics: Red