DESD Mission and Charter - Clinical Genomics November 2014

From HL7 TSC
Revision as of 19:10, 2 December 2014 by Melva Peters1 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Return to Domain Experts Electronic Voting Summaries Please vote on the M&C for the Clinical Genomics WG. Enter your name and WG along with your vote. 1 vote per WG. Poll...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Return to Domain Experts Electronic Voting Summaries

Please vote on the M&C for the Clinical Genomics WG. Enter your name and WG along with your vote. 1 vote per WG. Poll open until November 25, 2014

Link to M&C

CLINICAL GENOMICS M&C

Link to Doodle Poll DOODLE POLL

  • Summary -
    • Number of participants: 10
    • Most popular option: Affirmative
    • Votes in favor: 9
    • Comments: 2
    • Non-participating work groups counted as abstaining solely for the purpose of counting quorum: 0

VOTE

' Affirmative Negative (only with comment) Abstain
John Kiser (RCRIM) OK
Martin Hurrell (Anesthesia) OK
Craig Gabron (AWG) OK
Ken Pool (PHER) OK
Michael Padula (Child Health) OK
edward heltonBRIDG OK
Scott Robertson (PHARM) OK
Laura Heermann Langford (PCWG) OK
Jim McClay (EDWG) OK
Dianne Reeves (CIC) OK
Count 9 0 1

Comments

CIC Workgroup Wednesday, November 19, 2014 Second item - in the Mission statement there is a statement 'CLinical Genomics will seek to assure that related or supportive standards produced by other HL7 WGs are robust enough...' If you mean that Clinical Genomics will work with other WGs to insure wider ability to support clinical genomics in clinical care or research, that should be reworked.
"CIC Workgroup Wednesday, November 19, 2014 Two issues in the M&C may be due to language complications. 1) In the first sentence, are you saying that the 'interested parties' are required to support personalized medicine, or that the various data - clinical, personal genomic and family health history - are needed to support personalized medicine. Right now the sentence says the former - that interested parties are required, and I'm not sure if that is your intent. Restating this sentence would be helpful. (see next comment)