Difference between revisions of "Concall-20081027"

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 28: Line 28:
 
##Accept Agenda -  
 
##Accept Agenda -  
 
##Approve Minutes from [[concall-20081013]] -   
 
##Approve Minutes from [[concall-20081013]] -   
##Results of eVote on SD projects:
+
##eVote Results (SD projects):
 
##*TB DAM project- passed with 6 in favor, 0 against, 0 abstentions
 
##*TB DAM project- passed with 6 in favor, 0 against, 0 abstentions
 
##*Composite Privacy Consent Directive, R1 project - passed with 6 in favor, 0 against, 0 abstentions
 
##*Composite Privacy Consent Directive, R1 project - passed with 6 in favor, 0 against, 0 abstentions

Revision as of 12:12, 27 October 2008

TSC - Technical Steering Committee

Monday, October 27, 2008 11:00 AM (US Eastern Time, GMT -5)
To participate, dial 770-657-9270 and enter pass code 124466#
GoToMeeting at https://www.gotomeeting.com/join/822618174
GoToMeeting ID: 822-618-174 

back to TSC Minutes and Agendas

Attendance

Expected

  • CTO: John Quinn
  • Domain Experts: Jim Case (primary), Austin Kreisler (alternate)
  • Foundation & Technology: Ioana Singureanu (primary), Woody Beeler (alternate)
  • Structure & Semantic Design: Calvin Beebe (primary), Gregg Seppala (alternate)
  • Technical & Support Services: Ken McCaslin (primary), Helen Stevens Love (alternate)
  • Affiliate: Frank Oemig,
  • ARB Chair: Charlie Mead
  • HQ: Karen Van Hentenryck

invited

  • Charles Jaffe (CEO); Ed Hammond (HL7 Chair); Chuck Meyer (HL7 Vice Chair); Ed Tripp (newly elected TSC member); Ravi Natarajan (newly elected TSC member)

Apologies

  • Gregg Seppala

Agenda

  1. (5 min) Meeting Admin
    1. Roll Call - The following individuals joined the call:
    2. Accept Agenda -
    3. Approve Minutes from concall-20081013 -
    4. eVote Results (SD projects):
      • TB DAM project- passed with 6 in favor, 0 against, 0 abstentions
      • Composite Privacy Consent Directive, R1 project - passed with 6 in favor, 0 against, 0 abstentions
      • Public Health Related CMET project - passed with 6 in favor, 0 against, 0 abstentions
      • RIM annual balloting project - passed with 6 in favor, 0 against, 0 abstentions
      • Patient Administration derived CMET project - passed with 6 in favor, 0 against, 0 abstentions
      • V3 Organization Registries, R2 project - passed with 5 in favor, 0 against, 1 abstention
      • V3 Provider Registries, R1 project - passed with 6 in favor, 0 against, 0 abstentions
      • GELLO V1 IG project - passed with 5 in favor, 0 against, 1 abstention
      • HL7 EHR Clinical Research Functional Profile project - passed with 6 in favor, 0 against, 0 abstentions
      • Account and Billing CMET project - passed with 5 in favor, 0 against, 1 abstention
      • Consumer Information Accolunt Project - passed with 5 in favor, 0 against, 1 abstention
      • Common Clinical Project - passed with 5 in favor, 0 against, 1 abstention
  2. (20 min) Standing Committee Reports/Approvals
    1. CEO Report -
    2. CTO Report - Quinn submitted the following report via email [1]
    3. ArB Report -
      • Recommendation for public posting/dispositioning of SAEAF document comments
    4. Affiliates Report -
    5. Domain Experts -
      • MOTION by SD: To approve the updated ICSR R3 project scope [2]
      • QUESTION - We have a work group that is considering creating a project to creat and ballot a HL7 2.3.1 Implementation Guide. Since 2.3.1 is no longer a supported HL7 version, should HL7 be balloting Implementation Guides for versions that are no longer supported?
    6. Foundation & Technology -
      • QUESTION: It is unclear how providing a yearly balloted version of the RIM will affect any open-source tooling that relies on the RIM or an external SDO that wishes to harmonized its information models with HL7. These are questions the TSC needs to answer.
    7. Structure & Semantic Design -
      • Request from Alschuler to approve balloting the Assessment template document in upcoming ballot cycle. [3] From Alschuler: Unless I hear objections raised, will continue to assume that we can move ahead with this for the Dec/Jan cycle. The rationale for the push is to meet the requirement identified by HITSP. Note that Patient Care is a co-sponsor of the ballot (Willem and others were on the call with us this morning) and that we have added IHE and HITSP as interested parties.
    8. Technical & Support Services -
      • Role of the SD Project Facilitator (TSC Issue: 756)
  3. (30 min) Discussion topics
    • Review draft mission/charter template - Case (TSC Issue: 593)[4]
    • Review of updated DMPs [5] - McCay
    • Identifying business in agendas for upcoming WGM - McCay (TSC Issue: 761)
    • Enterprise Architecture implementation project - McCay
    • Infrastructure release planning - McCay
    • Update on upcoming Technical Newsletter - Van Hentenryck

Agenda item list (our sand box for future meetings)

Click for TSC Action Item List