Difference between revisions of "ConCall-20070130"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
WoodyBeeler (talk | contribs) |
WoodyBeeler (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
=Core Challenges, particularly TD role & Organization= | =Core Challenges, particularly TD role & Organization= | ||
Whole meeting was devoted to discussion of this topic using two additional documents submitted by Lorenzi and Parker. | Whole meeting was devoted to discussion of this topic using two additional documents submitted by Lorenzi and Parker. | ||
| − | + | ==[http://www.hl7.org/documentcenter/public/wg/t3f/general/Organizational%20Charts%20for%20Discussion.ppt Charts from Virginia Lorenzi]== | |
Virginia Lorenzi had assembled a [http://www.hl7.org/documentcenter/public/wg/t3f/general/Organizational%20Charts%20for%20Discussion.ppt '''Power point of Charts'''] that she prepared to reflect the TD relationships as they were expressed in either other charts or textual descriptions from th SI effort. These included: | Virginia Lorenzi had assembled a [http://www.hl7.org/documentcenter/public/wg/t3f/general/Organizational%20Charts%20for%20Discussion.ppt '''Power point of Charts'''] that she prepared to reflect the TD relationships as they were expressed in either other charts or textual descriptions from th SI effort. These included: | ||
| Line 31: | Line 13: | ||
*:*Cons - subsumes an influential position that volunteer leaders might aspire to and desire. | *:*Cons - subsumes an influential position that volunteer leaders might aspire to and desire. | ||
*'''Revised SI diagram based on feedback from Board and others''' - Notes: One worrisome feature is the "final authority" designation of the CTO. Note also, it includes the notion of a TSC. | *'''Revised SI diagram based on feedback from Board and others''' - Notes: One worrisome feature is the "final authority" designation of the CTO. Note also, it includes the notion of a TSC. | ||
| + | ==[http://www.hl7.org/documentcenter/public/wg/t3f/general/org.png Sketched chart from Craig Parker]== | ||
| + | Noting that the charts provided tended to mix and match between organizational responsibilities (hierarchy) and organizational relationships (horizontal), Craig Parker assembled a sketched chart that reflects both sets of relations on a single slide. | ||
| − | + | This wa discussed briefly. We concluded that a single format such as this is desirable as an end-product. | |
| − | =[[ | + | ==[[CM_comments_on_TD_definition_from_Strategic_Recommendations|Comments from Charlie McCay on TD definition]]== |
| − | + | Charlie McCay had prepared annotations on the TD definitions. The group agreed this is a good direction and would like to expand and refine this list in our next conference call. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 21:11, 2 February 2007
Contents
Core Challenges, particularly TD role & Organization
Whole meeting was devoted to discussion of this topic using two additional documents submitted by Lorenzi and Parker.
Charts from Virginia Lorenzi
Virginia Lorenzi had assembled a Power point of Charts that she prepared to reflect the TD relationships as they were expressed in either other charts or textual descriptions from th SI effort. These included:
- Simplified version of chart produced by ORC - Discussed why ARB, Cross-domain and PMO were separate from TD. Presume this is because it was felt that these were Board interests that were separable from TD.
- TD as presented by graphically by the consultants - Notes: PMO is part of TD; No overt resolution group (including ARB); Production (Ed, Tooling, Pubs added) and "Product Management" above the three areas.
- (Some discussion of what "Product" Management is (person, group, subset of TC chairs, etc.))
- In narrative, as noted, the Chairs of the three TC boxes are part of TD.
- Composition of TD, as presented in the consultants text - Suggests a good bit of "power" to CTO. However, the essence of the TD is to get and keep the organization moving forward in a coordinated fashion.
- Discussion of the CTO as a paid vs a volunteer position.
- Pros - Full attention to the problem;
- Cons - subsumes an influential position that volunteer leaders might aspire to and desire.
- Discussion of the CTO as a paid vs a volunteer position.
- Revised SI diagram based on feedback from Board and others - Notes: One worrisome feature is the "final authority" designation of the CTO. Note also, it includes the notion of a TSC.
Sketched chart from Craig Parker
Noting that the charts provided tended to mix and match between organizational responsibilities (hierarchy) and organizational relationships (horizontal), Craig Parker assembled a sketched chart that reflects both sets of relations on a single slide.
This wa discussed briefly. We concluded that a single format such as this is desirable as an end-product.
Comments from Charlie McCay on TD definition
Charlie McCay had prepared annotations on the TD definitions. The group agreed this is a good direction and would like to expand and refine this list in our next conference call.
