2017-01-09 TSC Call Agenda
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
TSC Agenda/Minutes
Meeting Info/Attendees
Standing Conference Calls
TSC will hold a Conference Call at 11AM Eastern time, each Monday except during scheduled face-to-face Working Group Meetings unless otherwise noted at TSC_Minutes_and_Agendas.
- GoToMeeting at https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/426505829 using VOIP
- For those without access to microphone/speakers:
- US: +1 (224)501-3318
- Canada: +1 (647)497-9379
- Italy: +39 0 230 57 81 80
- Access Code: 426-505-829
- GoToMeeting ID: 426-505-829
| HL7 TSC Meeting Minutes Location: GoToMeeting ID: 426-505-829 |
Date: 2017-01-09 Time: 11:00 AM U.S. Eastern | |
| Facilitator: Ken McCaslin | Note taker(s): Anne Wizauer | |
| Quorum = chair + 5 including 2 SD represented | yes/no | ||||||
| Chair/CTO | ArB | International Affiliate Rep | Ad-Hoc | ||||
| Regrets | Ken McCaslin | x | Tony Julian | x | Jean Duteau | x | Freida Hall, GOM Expert |
| x | Wayne Kubick | x | Lorraine Constable | x | Giorgio Cangioli | . | Woody Beeler, TSC Member Emeritus |
| . | . | . | . | ||||
| Domain Experts | Foundation and Technology | Structure and Semantic Design | Technical and Support Services | ||||
| x | Melva Peters | . | Russ Hamm | x | Calvin Beebe | x | Andy Stechishin |
| x | John Roberts | x | Paul Knapp | x | Austin Kreisler | Regrets | Sandra Stuart |
| . | . | . | . | ||||
| ex officio | Invited Guests | Observers | HL7 Staff | ||||
| . | Pat Van Dyke (HL7 Chair) w/vote | x | Lloyd McKenzie | . | obs1 | x | Anne Wizauer |
| . | Chuck Jaffe (CEO) |
. | . | . | obs2 | . |
|
| . | . | . | . | . | |||
Agenda
- Housekeeping
- Introduction of visitors (including declaration of interests)
- Agenda review and approval -
- Approve Minutes of 2016-12-12 TSC Call Agenda
- Confirm TSC San Antonio Attendance
- Review action items –
- Wayne to attend PIC call regarding ownership of co-chair handbook updates and look at change request process
- Wayne to get clarity from the Board on HL7 intentions for User Groups
- Wayne to research with EC if any decisions were made regarding extensions for items cited in regulation
- Freida to ask GOC if TSC can adjust extension limit for items cited in regulation
- Calvin to take issue of ballot level change requests to SGB
- Anne to send SWOT out for comment before WGM discussion
- Approval item from previous e-votes approved 7/0/0 with Wayne, T3SD, DESD, FTSD, ARB, Jean, and Giorgio voting:
- STU Extension Request by the PHER WG of the DESD for HL7 CDA® R2 IG: Reporting to Public Health Cancer Registries from Ambulatory Healthcare Providers, R1, DSTU Release 1.1 - US Realm at Project Insight 1069 and TSC Tracker 12458
- STU Publication Request from the CQI WG of the DESD for HL7 CDA® R2 Implementation Guide: Quality Reporting Document Architecture (QRDA III), Release 2 - US Realm at Project Insight 896 and TSC Tracker 12483
- STU Publication Request by the CQI WG of the DESD for HL7 CDA® R2 Implementation Guide: Quality Reporting Document Architecture (QRDA I), Release 1, STU Release 4 - US Realm at Project Insight 210 and TSC Tracker 12482
- Project Approval Request by the OO WG of the SSD-SD for Ordering Service Interfact Specification Project at Project Insight 1010 and TSC Tracker 12481
- Approval Items for This Week:
- Informative Publication Request by the CBCC WG of the DESD for HL7 Specification:Standards Privacy Impact Assessment (SPIA) Implementation Guide, Release 1 at Project Insight 1263 and TSC Tracker 12575
- Unballoted STU Update Request by the PHER WG of the DESD for HL7 CDA® R2 Implementation Guide: Public Health Case Report, Release 2, STU Release 1.1 (US Realm) - the Electronic Initial Case Report (eICR)' at Project Insight 1216 and TSC Tracker 12574
- Discussion topics:
- Standards Governance Board member terms
- Implementation Guide Ballot Resolution (Paul/Lloyd McKenzie)
- Communication of rules (continued from last call)
- San Antonio Agenda
- CTO Update - Q1
- Organizational realignment - Q1
- Organizational realignemnt, continued - Q2
- Revision/expansion of withdrawal template - Q2
- Developing requirements for logging issues/comments across standards - Calvin - Q3
- Identifying and communicating essential rules - Q3
- TSC SWOT - Q4
- Review of M&C for CDA product family management group - Q4
- Others?
- Open Issues List/Parking Lot
- Dynamic location for updates to organizational decisions/principles
Minutes
- Housekeeping
- Introduction of visitors (including declaration of interests)
- Agenda review and approval -
- Approve Minutes of 2016-12-12 TSC Call Agenda
- MOTION to approve: Melva/Calvin
- VOTE: all in favor
- Confirm TSC San Antonio Attendance
- Not attending: Andy
- Review action items –
- Wayne to attend PIC call regarding ownership of co-chair handbook updates and look at change request process
- Will be discussing at WGM
- Wayne to get clarity from the Board on HL7 intentions for User Groups
- Some concerns regarding cannibalizing WG participation - need to review definition of how they would operate
- Wayne to research with EC if any decisions were made regarding extensions for items cited in regulation
- Freida to ask GOC if TSC can adjust extension limit for items cited in regulation
- EC is supportive of changing GOM to extend beyond two years without re-extending every year; have asked that TSC craft language. Paul: If not one year, then how many years? Wayne: Perhaps annual periodic review; bottom line is we need to do something with it.
- Anne to add to WGM agenda
- EC is supportive of changing GOM to extend beyond two years without re-extending every year; have asked that TSC craft language. Paul: If not one year, then how many years? Wayne: Perhaps annual periodic review; bottom line is we need to do something with it.
- Calvin to take issue of ballot level change requests to SGB
- SGB will discuss in San Antonio
- Anne to send SWOT out for comment before WGM discussion
- Wayne to attend PIC call regarding ownership of co-chair handbook updates and look at change request process
- Approval item from previous e-votes approved 7/0/0 with Wayne, T3SD, DESD, FTSD, ARB, Jean, and Giorgio voting:
- STU Extension Request by the PHER WG of the DESD for HL7 CDA® R2 IG: Reporting to Public Health Cancer Registries from Ambulatory Healthcare Providers, R1, DSTU Release 1.1 - US Realm at Project Insight 1069 and TSC Tracker 12458
- STU Publication Request from the CQI WG of the DESD for HL7 CDA® R2 Implementation Guide: Quality Reporting Document Architecture (QRDA III), Release 2 - US Realm at Project Insight 896 and TSC Tracker 12483
- STU Publication Request by the CQI WG of the DESD for HL7 CDA® R2 Implementation Guide: Quality Reporting Document Architecture (QRDA I), Release 1, STU Release 4 - US Realm at Project Insight 210 and TSC Tracker 12482
- Project Approval Request by the OO WG of the SSD-SD for Ordering Service Interfact Specification Project at Project Insight 1010 and TSC Tracker 12481
- Discussion topics:
- Standards Governance Board member terms
- Some members were on one year terms: Calvin, Austin, and Lorraine
- MOTION to reappoint Austin and Lorraine for a two year term on the SGB with Calvin serving as ex-officio: John/Tony
- VOTE: All in favor
- Some members were on one year terms: Calvin, Austin, and Lorraine
- Implementation Guide Ballot Resolution (Paul/Lloyd McKenzie)
- Topic came up on FMG. Relates to policy around ballot reconciliation for IGs; different groups are handling them differently. Some IGs are directly managed by WGs in the normal channels; some are handled by "projects" that are sponsored by a WG, but the work is not always done using WG processes. Work is sometimes happening in external forums without the sponsoring WG being directly involved in voting, etc. Lorraine: The WG is still responsible for the overall approval. Lloyd: The FMG is looking for an understanding of what exactly the expectations are for the disposition/reconciliation process for ballots on IGs. Is the expectation that all reconciliation must happen within the WG? A final vote must happen within the WG? Lorraine: Has to be consistent with the WGs DMPs. Some provide a chair to the WG call; all must approve the material going forward. Lloyd: So the expectation is that the WG must vote on accepting the reconciliation spreadsheet to allow the material to go forward, and it's up to the WG as to whether the discussion happens on regular WG calls, project calls with a WG designated chair, or is delegated to the project for discussion and debate knowing that the final recommendation will come back to WG. Paul: It all must be reviewed publically. Freida: There is a section in the cochair handbook regarding reconciliation that states the reconciliation should be posted in the ballot desktop, as well as incremental spreadsheets being posted. John: WG must control the process, not the project team.
- ACTION: Wayne or Ken will review at cochair dinner
- Topic came up on FMG. Relates to policy around ballot reconciliation for IGs; different groups are handling them differently. Some IGs are directly managed by WGs in the normal channels; some are handled by "projects" that are sponsored by a WG, but the work is not always done using WG processes. Work is sometimes happening in external forums without the sponsoring WG being directly involved in voting, etc. Lorraine: The WG is still responsible for the overall approval. Lloyd: The FMG is looking for an understanding of what exactly the expectations are for the disposition/reconciliation process for ballots on IGs. Is the expectation that all reconciliation must happen within the WG? A final vote must happen within the WG? Lorraine: Has to be consistent with the WGs DMPs. Some provide a chair to the WG call; all must approve the material going forward. Lloyd: So the expectation is that the WG must vote on accepting the reconciliation spreadsheet to allow the material to go forward, and it's up to the WG as to whether the discussion happens on regular WG calls, project calls with a WG designated chair, or is delegated to the project for discussion and debate knowing that the final recommendation will come back to WG. Paul: It all must be reviewed publically. Freida: There is a section in the cochair handbook regarding reconciliation that states the reconciliation should be posted in the ballot desktop, as well as incremental spreadsheets being posted. John: WG must control the process, not the project team.
- Communication of rules (continued from last call)
- Will discuss at WGM
- San Antonio Agenda
- CTO Update - Q1
- Essentialism and Organizational realignment - Q1
- Revision/expansion of withdrawal template - Q2
- Essentialism and Organizational realignment, continued - Q2
- Developing requirements for logging issues/comments across standards - Calvin - Q3
- Identifying and communicating essential rules - Q3
- Extension for STUs cited in government regulation - Q4
- TSC SWOT - Q4
- Review of M&C for CDA product family management group - Q4
- Standards Governance Board member terms
- Open Issues List/Parking Lot
- Dynamic location for updates to organizational decisions/principles
- Adjourned at 11:33 AM Eastern
Next Steps
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
| |||
| Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
© 2016 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.
