Difference between revisions of "2015-02-11 TRAC"
Anne wizauer (talk | contribs) (→Agenda) |
Anne wizauer (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | ___NOTOC__ | |
==TSC Risk Assessment Committee (TRAC) Agenda/Minutes == | ==TSC Risk Assessment Committee (TRAC) Agenda/Minutes == | ||
back to [[TRAC|TRAC page]] | back to [[TRAC|TRAC page]] | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
|colspan="2"|Chair/CTO ||colspan="2"|Members ||colspan="2"|Members | |colspan="2"|Chair/CTO ||colspan="2"|Members ||colspan="2"|Members | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | ||Pat Van Dyke|| ||Rick Haddorff|| ||Freida Hall | + | |x||Pat Van Dyke||x||Rick Haddorff|| ||Freida Hall |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | ||Austin Kreisler || || Ken McCaslin|| || Melva Peters | + | |x||Austin Kreisler || || Ken McCaslin||x|| Melva Peters |
|- | |- | ||
| ||John Quinn || ||John Roberts|| || | | ||John Quinn || ||John Roberts|| || | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
*Agenda review and approval - Pat Van Dyke | *Agenda review and approval - Pat Van Dyke | ||
*Review minutes of [[2015-02-04 TRAC]] | *Review minutes of [[2015-02-04 TRAC]] | ||
| − | * | + | *Discussion Items: |
| − | ** | + | **Argonaut |
| − | * | + | **Three-year planning |
===Minutes=== | ===Minutes=== | ||
'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/> | '''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/> | ||
| − | * | + | *Call began at 10:02 |
| + | *3-Year Plan Project: Reviewed document put forward by Pat. Group discussed the way different WGs use the 3-year plan – everyone seems to use it differently. Discussed notion of 1-3-5 year plans. Austin states some groups just don’t fine these plans useful and do the minimum necessary to meet the metric. | ||
| + | Austin remarks that other tools (like PBS metrics) are far more useful. Suggestion to change the name; perhaps “Managing WG Ballots and Standards.’ Group wonders if the 1-3-5 plan would cause more groaning from the WGs – may produce burden instead of value. Pat asks if we should simply keep the 3-year plan in place for now and help WGs learn how to meet the metric. If so, should we rename it? Rick suggests that WGs could come to Project Services for help if they are struggling or questioning its utility. Recommendation: Leave it named as it is; leave what we have in place; put together some guidance about how to manage the 3-year plan and the PBS metrics; educate WGs on how to make it an actual useful tool. Pat will work with Rick to come up with some guidance – Rick will take to Project Services. | ||
| + | *Pat put together governance piece re: projects like Argonaut. TSC and WGs have not been informed in a timely manner of projects coming in from outside. Will continue review/discussion on this next week; then no meetings next two weeks after that, resuming on March 11. | ||
Adjourned | Adjourned | ||
Latest revision as of 15:02, 18 February 2015
_
TSC Risk Assessment Committee (TRAC) Agenda/Minutes
back to TRAC page
Meeting Info/Attendees
| TRAC Meeting Minutes Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371# |
Date: Wednesday, 2015-02-11 Time: 10:00 AM U.S. Eastern | |
| Facilitator: Pat Van Dyke | Note taker(s): Anne | |
| Quorum | n/a | ||||
| Chair/CTO | Members | Members | |||
| x | Pat Van Dyke | x | Rick Haddorff | Freida Hall | |
| x | Austin Kreisler | Ken McCaslin | x | Melva Peters | |
| John Quinn | John Roberts | ||||
Agenda
- Agenda review and approval - Pat Van Dyke
- Review minutes of 2015-02-04 TRAC
- Discussion Items:
- Argonaut
- Three-year planning
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
- Call began at 10:02
- 3-Year Plan Project: Reviewed document put forward by Pat. Group discussed the way different WGs use the 3-year plan – everyone seems to use it differently. Discussed notion of 1-3-5 year plans. Austin states some groups just don’t fine these plans useful and do the minimum necessary to meet the metric.
Austin remarks that other tools (like PBS metrics) are far more useful. Suggestion to change the name; perhaps “Managing WG Ballots and Standards.’ Group wonders if the 1-3-5 plan would cause more groaning from the WGs – may produce burden instead of value. Pat asks if we should simply keep the 3-year plan in place for now and help WGs learn how to meet the metric. If so, should we rename it? Rick suggests that WGs could come to Project Services for help if they are struggling or questioning its utility. Recommendation: Leave it named as it is; leave what we have in place; put together some guidance about how to manage the 3-year plan and the PBS metrics; educate WGs on how to make it an actual useful tool. Pat will work with Rick to come up with some guidance – Rick will take to Project Services.
- Pat put together governance piece re: projects like Argonaut. TSC and WGs have not been informed in a timely manner of projects coming in from outside. Will continue review/discussion on this next week; then no meetings next two weeks after that, resuming on March 11.
Adjourned
Next Steps
| Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
| |||
| Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
© 2014 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved
