Difference between revisions of "2014-04-09 TRAC"

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 32: Line 32:
  
 
===Agenda===
 
===Agenda===
*Agenda review and approval - Pat Van Dyke (Dave copied forward last week's agenda because he wasn't sure if all the items were addressed enough to have them removed)
+
*Agenda review and approval - Pat Van Dyke  
*Review minutes of [[2014-04-09 TRAC]]  
+
*Review minutes of [[2014-04-02 TRAC]]  
 
*Action Items:
 
*Action Items:
**Generic WGM Checklist Calendar
+
**Generic WGM Checklist Calendar - Rick
**List of late submitted projects
+
**List of late submitted projects - Dave
 
**Pat will work on developing a straw man for separate criteria for informative ballot reconciliation in 6 months, for example.  
 
**Pat will work on developing a straw man for separate criteria for informative ballot reconciliation in 6 months, for example.  
 
**Melva will re-review the T3F risks and give a first draft on impact and likelihood for review on the next call.  
 
**Melva will re-review the T3F risks and give a first draft on impact and likelihood for review on the next call.  

Revision as of 18:34, 8 April 2014

TSC Risk Assessment Committee (TRAC) Agenda/Minutes

back to TRAC page

Meeting Info/Attendees

TRAC Meeting Minutes

Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371#

Date: Wednesday, 2014-04-09
Time: 10:00 AM U.S. Eastern
Facilitator: Pat Van Dyke Note taker(s): Lynn
Quorum n/a
Chair/CTO Members Members
Pat Van Dyke Rick Haddorff Melva Peters
John Quinn Austin Kreisler

Agenda

  • Agenda review and approval - Pat Van Dyke
  • Review minutes of 2014-04-02 TRAC
  • Action Items:
    • Generic WGM Checklist Calendar - Rick
    • List of late submitted projects - Dave
    • Pat will work on developing a straw man for separate criteria for informative ballot reconciliation in 6 months, for example.
    • Melva will re-review the T3F risks and give a first draft on impact and likelihood for review on the next call.
    • Get history of infractions on PSS and NIB deadlines for last two years and make a copy of the PSS guidance for the NIB deadline. Bring it back to TSC for an opinion on whether they want a metric on projects coming in late as there is a steady stream of them Averaging 3+ PSS coming in late each cycle.
      • Find out what the 7+ day late PSS were to see what type of exceptions they represent.
  • Review 20140212 risk spreadsheet
    • precepts for the IP protection issues and address the related risks.
  • TSC referred action:
    • WG Balloting metric: bundling together other PBS metrics measures including balloting in previous cycles, submitting PSS on time and NIBs on time, etc
      • Ballot quality assessment consideration as a governance point/work group health metric/strategic initiatives dashboard metric. Larger sample size, Other measures the TRAC might assess are % of negatives less than 20, or ballots not returned versus negative balloters.
      • Discuss outreach to ballot evaluators on what additional ballot quality measures should be performed.

Minutes

Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
Convened



Adjourned

Next Steps

Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)


Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items


© 2014 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved