Difference between revisions of "2013-02-28 TRAC"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with '_NOTOC__ ==TSC Risk Assessment Committee (TRAC) Agenda/Minutes == back to TRAC page ===Meeting Info/Attendees=== Category:2013 TSC Minutes {|border="1" cellpad…') |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | __NOTOC__ | |
==TSC Risk Assessment Committee (TRAC) Agenda/Minutes == | ==TSC Risk Assessment Committee (TRAC) Agenda/Minutes == | ||
back to [[TRAC|TRAC page]] | back to [[TRAC|TRAC page]] | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
|colspan="2"|Chair/CTO ||colspan="2"|Members ||colspan="2"|Members | |colspan="2"|Chair/CTO ||colspan="2"|Members ||colspan="2"|Members | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |x||Pat Van Dyke||.||Charlie Mead|| ||Melva Peters |
|- | |- | ||
| − | |.||John Quinn || ||Austin Kreisler||.||| | + | |.||John Quinn ||x ||Austin Kreisler||.||| |
|- | |- | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
|} | |} | ||
===Agenda=== | ===Agenda=== | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
*Agenda review and approval - Pat Van Dyke | *Agenda review and approval - Pat Van Dyke | ||
*Overview of work to date - | *Overview of work to date - | ||
| Line 38: | Line 36: | ||
***Set review schedule for known sources of risk | ***Set review schedule for known sources of risk | ||
***Plan for review of GOM on regular basis | ***Plan for review of GOM on regular basis | ||
| + | ***Describe feedback loop | ||
*Areas submitted where review still needs to occur | *Areas submitted where review still needs to occur | ||
**Check with Jane on GOM Section 16 Risks | **Check with Jane on GOM Section 16 Risks | ||
| Line 49: | Line 48: | ||
| − | |||
===Minutes=== | ===Minutes=== | ||
'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/> | '''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/> | ||
| + | *Look at the updated risk assessment; determine what the triggers are for ongoing review. | ||
| + | *Scheduling - Pat out for three weeks after next Thursday. | ||
| + | *Austin suggests we may need to reach out to non-TSC people for the group. Charlie has been unable to facilitate developing governance points as he's lost participation funding. Melva is in Singapore on a 12-hour time difference. Charlie's backup might be Jane but she has also been withdrawing her HL7 participation. | ||
| + | **Who would our outreach group be? Perhaps we need methodology representation - someone from MnM? Need someone from project services, perhaps Rick Haddorff. Names floated included Hans, Jim Case. Sequestration and furlough plans by the Feds discussed. Brian may be another. | ||
| + | *JeanH starting the ANSI/GOM processes review. | ||
| + | *Austin notes that this group needs to take the risk assessment and turn it into governance points. Outstanding review on Jane's section; if she can't finish GOM Section 16. | ||
| + | *How to address "issues"? TSC needs to address issues for active management, though the risk must still be tracked. After initial risk triage and creation of governance points, the risk assessment activity becomes a management function. The TRAC continues to consider governance points. The development of mechanisms to handle governance vs management work with the TSC. It was thought that the Architecture Program would take on the management aspects. | ||
| + | * T3F Strategic Initiative TSC Self Assessment [http://lists.hl7.org/read/attachment/223431/2/T3F_Assessment_survey_results20121024.pdf results] - review red and yellow against existing risk items; if there isn't one then develop new risk items. This would make a good introductory task for someone coming in from outreach. Original survey is at http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/7262/10203/Survey_30497710.pdf. | ||
| + | Adjourned at 9:57 AM | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
===Next Steps=== | ===Next Steps=== | ||
{|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" | {|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" | ||
Latest revision as of 15:58, 28 February 2013
TSC Risk Assessment Committee (TRAC) Agenda/Minutes
back to TRAC page
Meeting Info/Attendees
| TRAC Meeting Minutes Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371# |
Date: 2013-02-28 Time: 11:00 AM U.S. Eastern | |
| Facilitator: Pat Van Dyke | Note taker(s): Lynn Laakso | |
| Quorum ?? | yes/no | ||||
| Chair/CTO | Members | Members | |||
| x | Pat Van Dyke | . | Charlie Mead | Melva Peters | |
| . | John Quinn | x | Austin Kreisler | . | |
Agenda
- Agenda review and approval - Pat Van Dyke
- Overview of work to date -
- What areas where review has been submitted and completed
- Set review schedule for known sources of risk
- Plan for review of GOM on regular basis
- Describe feedback loop
- What areas where review has been submitted and completed
- Areas submitted where review still needs to occur
- Check with Jane on GOM Section 16 Risks
- T3F Strategic Initiative TSC Self Assessment results
- Confirmation of meeting time - meet Feb 28th, March 7, break, and resume April 4th
- Continue risk assessment review (GOM)
- Columns F and I are consistent and risks are typed correctly
- Review GOM sections 5, 10, 13, 14, 15 with group
- Plan for review of impact: critical and likelihood: High
- How to address "issues"
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
- Look at the updated risk assessment; determine what the triggers are for ongoing review.
- Scheduling - Pat out for three weeks after next Thursday.
- Austin suggests we may need to reach out to non-TSC people for the group. Charlie has been unable to facilitate developing governance points as he's lost participation funding. Melva is in Singapore on a 12-hour time difference. Charlie's backup might be Jane but she has also been withdrawing her HL7 participation.
- Who would our outreach group be? Perhaps we need methodology representation - someone from MnM? Need someone from project services, perhaps Rick Haddorff. Names floated included Hans, Jim Case. Sequestration and furlough plans by the Feds discussed. Brian may be another.
- JeanH starting the ANSI/GOM processes review.
- Austin notes that this group needs to take the risk assessment and turn it into governance points. Outstanding review on Jane's section; if she can't finish GOM Section 16.
- How to address "issues"? TSC needs to address issues for active management, though the risk must still be tracked. After initial risk triage and creation of governance points, the risk assessment activity becomes a management function. The TRAC continues to consider governance points. The development of mechanisms to handle governance vs management work with the TSC. It was thought that the Architecture Program would take on the management aspects.
- T3F Strategic Initiative TSC Self Assessment results - review red and yellow against existing risk items; if there isn't one then develop new risk items. This would make a good introductory task for someone coming in from outreach. Original survey is at http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/7262/10203/Survey_30497710.pdf.
Adjourned at 9:57 AM
Next Steps
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
| |||
| Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
© 2013 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.
