2011-11-14 TSC Call Minutes
Revision as of 14:40, 14 November 2011 by Austin kreisler (talk | contribs)
TSC Agenda/Minutes
Meeting Info/Attendees
Standing Conference Calls
TSC will hold a Conference Call at 11AM Eastern time, each Monday except during scheduled face-to-face Working Group Meetings unless otherwise noted at TSC_Minutes_and_Agendas.
- GoToMeeting at https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/426505829 using VOIP
- For those without access to microphone/speakers:
- US: +1 (224)501-3318
- Canada: +1 (647)497-9379
- Italy: +39 0 230 57 81 80
- Access Code: 426-505-829
- GoToMeeting ID: 426-505-829
| HL7 TSC Meeting Minutes Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 124466# |
Date: 2011-11-14 Time: 11:00 AM U.S. Eastern | |
| Facilitator: Austin Kreisler | Note taker(s): Lynn Laakso | |
| Attendee | Name | Affiliation |
| ? | Calvin Beebe | HL7 SSD SD Co-Chair |
| ? | Woody Beeler | HL7 FTSD Co-Chair |
| ? | Bob Dolin | HL7 Board Chair |
| ? | Freida Hall | invited guest, HL7 T3SD SD Co-Chair-elect |
| ? | Tony Julian | HL7 FTSD Co-Chair |
| ? | Austin Kreisler | HL7 TSC Chair, DESD Co-Chair |
| ? | Lynn Laakso | HL7 staff support |
| ? | Patrick Loyd | HL7 T3SD Co-Chair |
| ? | Ken McCaslin | HL7 T3SD Co-Chair |
| ? | Charlie Mead | HL7 ArB Chair |
| ? | Ravi Natarajan | HL7 Affiliate Representative |
| ? | Ron Parker | HL7 ArB Alternate |
| regrets | John Quinn | HL7 CTO |
| regrets | Ed Tripp | HL7 DESD Co-Chair |
| ? | Pat Van Dyke | HL7 SSD SD Co-Chair |
| ? | Mead Walker | invited guest, HL7 DESD SD Co-Chair-elect |
| Quorum Requirements (Chair +5 with 2 SD Reps) Met: (yes/No) |
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- Introduction of visitors (including declaration of interests)
- Agenda review and approval - Austin Kreisler
- Approve Minutes
- Review action items –
- Ken will report back on Karen’s opinion on the ONC S&I LRI downgrade.
- Tracker #2060 Ken will create Strategic Dashboard criteria metrics recommendations for: Industry responsiveness and easier implementation
- Tracker #2059 Austin will create Strategic Dashboard criteria metrics for: Requirements traceability and cross-artifact consistency
- Requirements traceability - Tied to HL7 roll out of SAIF ECCF. measure is the number of milestones completed
- Informative SAIF Canonical document published
- DSTU SAIF Canonical document published
- Normative SAIF Canonical document published
- Peer Reviewed HL7 SAIF IG including ECCF chapter and draft SAIF Artifact Definitions
- DSTU HL7 SAIF IG published
- Normative HL7 SAIF IG published
- SAIF Architecture Program experimental phase of HL7 SAIF ECCF implementation completed
- SAIF AP trial use phase of HL7 SAIF ECCF implementation completed
- HL7 SAIF ECCF rolled to all work groups working on applicable standards (V3 primarily)
- Cross-artifact consistency
- Percent of Work groups in FTSD, SSDSD and DESD participating in RIM/Vocab/Pattern Harmonization meetings, calculated as a 3 trimester moving average
- Survey of newly published standards via the publication request form
- V3 Standards - Measure - Green: All new standards have one or more of the following checked; Yellow: 1-2 standards have none of the following checked; Red: 3 or more standards have none of the following checked
- Standard uses CMETs from COCT domain
- Standard drawn from common Domain Model including Clinical Statement, Common Product Model, ???
- Standard uses harmonized design patterns (as defined through RIM Pattern harmonization process)
- V3 Standards - Measure - Green: All new standards have one or more of the following checked; Yellow: 1-2 standards have none of the following checked; Red: 3 or more standards have none of the following checked
- Requirements traceability - Tied to HL7 roll out of SAIF ECCF. measure is the number of milestones completed
- Tracker #2058 Woody will create Strategic Dashboard criteria metrics for: Product Quality
- Measure is the average number of ballot cycles necessary to pass a normative standard. Calculated as a 3 trimester moving average based on publication requests. Add a new field to publication request to document number of ballot cycles required to pass normative ballot.
- Green: 1-2 ballot cycles
- Yellow: 3-4 ballot cycles
- Red: 5+ ballot cycles
- Measure is the average number of ballot cycles necessary to pass a normative standard. Calculated as a 3 trimester moving average based on publication requests. Add a new field to publication request to document number of ballot cycles required to pass normative ballot.
- Tracker #2057 Patrick will create Strategic Dashboard criteria metrics for: WGM Effectiveness
- Approval items:
- Motion: Approve *final* Project Scope Statement for TSC cosponsors suggested are ArB and MnM, Risk Assessment and Governance for SAIF Architecture Program at Project Insight # 828 and TSC Tracker # 2109
- Tabled Motion: Approve DSTU Publication Request for Security WG of FTSD: V3 Security DAM, R1 (Composite Security and Privacy Domain Analysis Model aka Security Domain Analysis Model) at TSC Tracker # 2104, Project Insight # 529
- Woody's followup background email
- Please note: Kathleen sent an .emx file and Don is not able to publish from this.
- Discussion topics:
- (10 min) Modeling vs terminology (continued)
- Discussion thread: Universal/Perfect vs Simple/Done/Usable (was RE: Allergy Question)
- TSC review of Jan 2012 Ballot Anomalies, and TSC Approval Requests
- 3RD+ BALLOT CYCLE
- HL7 Implementation Guide for CDA® Release 2: Genetic Testing Reports, Release 1 (4th Comment Only Ballot) – Project Insight ID: 460
- HL7 Version 3 Standard: Identification of Medicinal Products – Creation and Maintenance Messages, Release 1 (3rd DSTU Ballot) – Project Insight ID: 501
- HL7 Version 3 Standard: Pharmacy; Medication Knowledge-Base Query, Release 1 (7th Normative Ballot) – Project Insight ID: 189
- PENDING PROJECT APPROVAL
- TSC - XML Encoding Rules for Version 2 Messages, Release 2 (1st Normative Ballot) – Project Insight ID: 825
- SD & TSC - HL7 Version 2 Implementation Guide: Clinical Genomics; fully LOINC-Qualified Cytogenetic Model, Release 1 - US Realm (1st Informative Ballot) – Project Insight ID: 663
- TSC - HL7 Templates Registry Business Process Requirements Analysis, Release 1 (Comment Only Ballot) – Project Insight ID: 829
- 3RD+ BALLOT CYCLE
- Process for Work Groups changing steering divisions
- Proposed process: Work group submits petition to change steering divisions for both its current steering division and proposed steering division. Both steering divisions need to approve petition based upon their decision making practices. Work Group may appeal steering division decisions to the TSC.
- Reminder: Pilot product brief website review feedback accepted until November 15th.
- Reminder: TSC members please complete the CTO evaluation
- Reminder: Feedback on TSC_Guidance_on_Ballot_Levels accepted until November 30th
- (10 min) Modeling vs terminology (continued)
- Reports: (attach written reports below from Steering Divisions et al.)
- Open Issues List
Supporting Documents
- See links
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
Please don't forget to hang up from the conference call (VOIP users)
Next Steps
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
| |||
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
