2010-08-30 TSC Call Agenda

From HL7 TSC
Revision as of 20:46, 25 August 2010 by Llaakso (talk | contribs) (→‎Agenda)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

TSC Agenda/Minutes

Meeting Info/Attendees

Standing Conference Calls

TSC will hold a Conference Call at 11AM Eastern time, each Monday except during scheduled face-to-face Working Group Meetings unless otherwise noted at TSC_Minutes_and_Agendas.

GoToMeeting at https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/426505829 using VOIP
For those without access to microphone/speakers:
US: +1 (224)501-3318
Canada: +1 (647)497-9379
Italy: +39 0 230 57 81 80
Access Code: 426-505-829
GoToMeeting ID: 426-505-829
HL7 TSC Meeting Minutes

Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 124466#
GoToMeeting ID: 165-215-206

Time: 11:00 AM U.S. Eastern
Facilitator Charlie McCay Note taker(s) Lynn Laakso
Attendee Name Affiliation
? Calvin Beebe HL7 SSD SD Co-Chair
? Woody Beeler HL7 FTSD Co-Chair
? Bob Dolin HL7 Board Chair
? Austin Kreisler HL7 DESD Co-Chair
regrets Lynn Laakso HL7 staff support
? Ken McCaslin HL7 TSS SD Co-Chair
? Charlie McCay (chair) HL7 TSC Chair, Affiliate Representative
? Charlie Mead HL7 ArB Chair
? Ravi Natarajan HL7 Affiliate Representative
? Ron Parker HL7 ArB Alternate
? John Quinn HL7 CTO
? Gregg Seppala HL7 SSD SD Co-Chair
? Helen Stevens HL7 TSS SD Co-Chair
? Ed Tripp HL7 DESD Co-Chair
? D. Mead Walker HL7 FTSD Co-Chair

Quorum Requirements (Chair +5 with 2 SD Reps) Met: (yes/No)


Agenda Topics

  1. Introduction of visitors (including declaration of interests)
  2. Agenda review and approval - Charlie McCay
  3. Approve Minutes of 2010-08-23_TSC_Call_Agenda
  4. Review action items
    • #1579 - Create Project Scope Statement for TSC Product and Services Strategy Project - Ken and Calvin
    • #1573 - John Quinn: Identify actions needed to be taken by the TSC based on Roadmap subcommittee recommendations. See criteria
    • #1548 - From 2010-05-03: John and Charlie Mead will work on a one sheet overview of SAIF vs NIEM, reviewed by ArB with the HL7 position
  5. HL7 Chair or CEO Report – if available
  6. CTO Report - John Quinn
  7. ArB Report – Charlie Mead/Ron Parker
  8. Affiliates Report – Ravi Natarajan/ Charlie McCay
  9. Domain Experts Report– Austin Kreisler/Ed Tripp
  10. Foundation & Technology Report– Woody Beeler/Mead Walker
  11. Structure & Semantic Design Report– Calvin Beebe/Gregg Seppala
  12. Technical & Support Services Report- Ken McCaslin/ Helen Stevens
    • Deployment of Decision Making Practices: Motion:That the TSC expects all Workgroups to review the new DMP Template and Default and either reaffirm an updated version of their DMP (based on the Template) or accept that the DMP Default will take effect by May 1st 2011. PIC will produce a 1-pager that lists the substantive changes in the DMP and provide resources in Cambridge to assist committees as requested.
  13. Membership Comments on Steering Division Reports
  14. WGM Planning -
    • Marketing and promotion - update from HQ -
    • TSC preparations -
      • Helen to review proposal on appointing interim co-chairs for WGs who are having difficulty confirming co-chair attendance at the Sydney WGM. Proposal: A leader can be selected through a motion by the WG to act with all of the powers, privileges, and responsibilities of a Co-Chair, except for the purposes of constituting quorum in a meeting, in the absence of a Co-Chair. The term shall expire after 1 year, at which point the WG may renew the term.
    • Working Group preparations - agendas
  15. Organizational Relations Committee update (semiweekly) - Helen Stevens
  16. Discussion Topics:
    • Open Issues List
      • #1585 - ApproveProject Scope Statement for Innovations Project
        Approved in committee 8/23/2010. Motion: Approve Project.
      • #1606 Guidelines for Universal projects:
        • Motion: accept guidelines as discussed on July 19th (having received no additional feedback for discussion)
          • Stakeholders representing 2 Realms at a minimum
          • Requirements coming from a minimum of 2 Realms
          • Project will be implemented in a minimum of 2 Realms
          • Minimum of 2 Realms represented on project team
          The assumption with these criteria is that a project should be considered Realm specific unless it can meet the above criteria (or some acceptable subset).
      • #1636 - Review Project Scope Statement for U.S. Healthcare Readiness Project

Supporting Documents


Minutes/Conclusions Reached:

Next Steps

Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
  • .
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
  • .