FTSD-ConCall-20141202

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Fndn&Tech Steering Divn - Conference Call (date above)

Meeting Information

Conference Call is scheduled for 0.5 hour,
Tuesday 12:00 PM to be repeated every other week
Please consult http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock for your local times
HL7 Conference Call Service
Phone Number: +1 770-657-9270 (Passcode: 943627)
Online Meeting Service - GoToMeeting
https://www2.gotomeeting.com/join/385800034 (GoToMeeting ID: 385-800-034)


Steering Division Members:

  • Application Integration & Design (AID)
  • Implementable Technology Specifications (ITS)
  • Conformance & Guidance for Implementation/Testing(CGIT)
  • Infrastructure & Messaging (InM)
  • Modeling & Methodology (MnM)
  • Security
  • Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)
  • Templates
  • Vocabulary

Attendees

Facilitator Note taker Quorum = 5 WGs
Paul Paul Yes
Implementable Technology Specifications (ITS) Conformance & Guidance for Implementation/Testing Infrastructure and Messaging (InM)
X Knapp, Paul . Huang, Wendy X Julian, Tony
. Nelson, Dale . Oemig, Frank . Shaver, Dave
. Stechishin, Andy . Singureanu, Ioana . Stuart, Sandy
. Snelick, Robert .
Modeling & Methodology (MnM) Application Integration and Design (AID) Security
. Beeler, Woody . Hendler MD, Peter . Blobel PhD, Bernd
. Duteau, Jean X Stechishin, Andy . Davis, Mike
. Grieve, Grahame . Spronk, Rene X Moehrke, John
. McKenzie, Lloyd Williams, Patricia
. Shakir, AbdulMalik
Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) Templates Vocabulary
. Jorgenson, Don . Heitmann, Kai . Case, James
. Lotti,Stefano . Roberts , John . Grain, Heather
. Rubin, Ken . Shafarman, Mark . Hamm, Russell
. McCauley, Vince X Hausam, Rob
. Klein, William Ted
.
Guests
X Hamill, Dave
. . = Absent, X = Present, r = Regrets

Agenda

  1. (05 min) Roll Call
  2. (20 min) FHIR WG Discussion
  3. (5 min) Other Business

Agenda items

FHIR WG Proposal, Mission and Charter Discussion:

ARB Request: It would be very useful if they positioned their work relative to SAIF, in particular defining their conceptual, logical, and implementable relationships. I would presume that FHIR WG would be deterministic on implementable model decisions that are FHIR centric while the language and relationships around logical and conceptual perspectives would be more conciliatory.

We are awaiting further developments of the Mission and Charter as per the ARB request. We have concerns regarding the scope described in the document and the overlap of that scope with existing work groups, and the location of responsibility of decisions.

Action Item List

Back to Meetings