DESSD PSS: CQI Harmonization of Health Quality Information Models
Revision as of 15:10, 30 May 2014 by Melva Peters1 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Return to Domain Experts Electronic Voting Summaries Please vote on the PSS for the CQI WG. Enter your name and WG along with your vote. 1 vote per WG. Poll open until Ma...")
Return to Domain Experts Electronic Voting Summaries
Please vote on the PSS for the CQI WG. Enter your name and WG along with your vote. 1 vote per WG. Poll open until May 28, 2014.
Work Group Health: Green Review of PBS Metrics: GREEN
Link to Doodle Poll: Doodle Poll Link
- Summary -
- Number of participants: 9
- Most popular option: Affirmative
- Votes in favor: 9
- Comments: 0
- Non-participating work groups counted as abstaining solely for the purpose of counting quorum:
| ' | Affirmative | Negative (with comments) | Abstain |
| CQI | OK | ||
| Edward Helton RCRIM | OK | ||
| John Rhoads (HCD/DEV) | OK | ||
| Melva Peters (Pharmacy) | OK | ||
| James Mcclay (ECWG) | OK | ||
| Russ Leftwich (Patient Care) | OK | ||
| John Walsh (Anesthesia) | OK | ||
| Mike Padula (Child Health) | OK | ||
| Dianne Reeves (CIC) | OK | ||
| Count | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| Comments | ' |
| CIC Wednesday, May 28, 2014 12:06:39 o'clock AM GMT+00:00 | This PSS references SAIF as the basis for the activity in several places in the document. At the Phoenix meeting at the cochairs dinner we heard that SAIF is essentially being retired for several reasons. Is it appropriate to continue to cite SAIF as a basis of this project, or something else? CIC does not require a change in the document but would like to know the thoughts of CQI on this item. |
| Patient Care Friday, May 9, 2014 3:30:37 o'clock PM GMT+00:00 | Please list Patient Care as an interested party to this project. Also, please explain "syntactic sugar". |
