2012-01-15 TSC WGM Minutes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
TSC Sunday meeting for 2012Jan WGM
back to TSC Minutes and Agendas
TSC WGM Agenda/Minutes
HL7 TSC Meeting Minutes Location: Mesquite |
Date: 2012-01-15 Time: 17:15 pm CST (local time) | |
Facilitator: Austin Kreisler | Note taker(s): Lynn Laakso | |
Attendee | Name | Affiliation |
? | Calvin Beebe | HL7 SSD SD Co-Chair |
? | Woody Beeler | HL7 FTSD Co-Chair |
? | Bob Dolin | HL7 Board Past Chair (member ex officio w/o vote) |
? | Freida Hall | HL7 TSS SD Co-Chair |
? | Chuck Jaffe | HL7 CEO (member ex officio w/o vote) |
? | Tony Julian | HL7 FTSD Co-Chair |
? | Austin Kreisler (Chair) | HL7 TSC Chair |
? | Lynn Laakso (scribe, non-voting) | HL7 HQ |
? | Patrick Loyd | HL7 T3SD Co-Chair |
? | Charlie Mead | HL7 ArB Chair |
? | Don Mon | HL7 Board Chair (member ex officio w/vote) |
regrets | Ravi Natarajan | HL7 Affiliate Representative |
? | Ron Parker | HL7 ArB Alternate |
? | John Quinn | HL7 CTO (TSC member ex officio w/vote) |
? | Helen Stevens | Ad-hoc member |
? | Ed Tripp | HL7 DESD Co-Chair |
? | Pat Van Dyke | HL7 SSD SD Co-Chair |
Quorum Requirements (Co-chair +5 with 2 SD Reps) Met: (yes/No) |
Agenda Topics - Sunday
- SAIF Architecture Program
- ArB Composition
- Substantivity - Tony
- ARB had an outstanding ballot item (since 2007? Gulp) on the term “substantive”. I believe this is of significant interest to the TSC and needs to be tested with them. Here is a normative definition of what constitutes “substantive” unanimously approved by ARB today:
- A substantive change is one that changes the semantics of a given artifact; this applies to both normative and non-normative artifacts.
- For artifacts that are normative, or are intended to be normative (ie: specifications) any change that affects conformity is substantive. By definition, normative means the artifact has conformity statement(s). If there is an extension to a normative artifact, it is substantive only if it adds or changes existing conformance statements.
- For non-normative artifacts, any change that adds new content, or affects a derivative work is substantive. Editorial change or clarification of original content or semantics is not substantive.
- Tony will pick up the thread of resolving our negatives from that ballot and re-balloting this.
- We speculate HL7 has never before balloted an item with only 4 paragraphs.
- ARB had an outstanding ballot item (since 2007? Gulp) on the term “substantive”. I believe this is of significant interest to the TSC and needs to be tested with them. Here is a normative definition of what constitutes “substantive” unanimously approved by ARB today:
- TSC Messages to CoChairs and General Session
Supporting Documents
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|